Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

'nifty fifty'


Recommended Posts

Greetings all,

After saving a few pennies, I have invested in a nifty fifty canon 50mm f1.8 prime lens.

I know that they need to be stopped back to f2-4 to avoid coma.......but do you all have any further tips with using these? and your favourite targets for the nifty fifty?

Remembering of course that I am southern hemisphere based.

I intend to use it widefield on my 1000D unmodded and my 40D modded dslr.

I look forward to your expertise :)

cheers,

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andywilliams said:

Greetings all,

After saving a few pennies, I have invested in a nifty fifty canon 50mm f1.8 prime lens.

I know that they need to be stopped back to f2-4 to avoid coma.......but do you all have any further tips with using these? and your favourite targets for the nifty fifty?

Remembering of course that I am southern hemisphere based.

I intend to use it widefield on my 1000D unmodded and my 40D modded dslr.

I look forward to your expertise :)

cheers,

Andy

You could try the milky way,  the southern pleiades,  eta carina nebula too,  large magellanic cloud if it's still visible where you live.  With the 50mm you'll get a lot of objects in frame. 

Do you have stellarium installed?  If not,  it is a handy program for finding targets and getting to know what's visible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stick close to the f/4 area, and adjust the ISO towards better quality if you start blowing out the image with too much light. I'd rather reduce noise then stop down(YMMV)

Have fun, shoot a LOT of data!

 

 

Scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a really good lens! However you need to stop it down not just because of coma, but also because of the color in the stars.

from light-polluted Oslo: Nikon d3300 (Nikon type nifty fifty) at 2.8 (I think) no tracking, 30X6sec exposures.

IMG_6130.JPG

IMG_6131.JPG

IMG_6132.JPG

You can see what I mean with colors in the stars, can't you? They get kinda blue'ish.

Clear skies!

Victor Boesen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, johnfosteruk said:

My first thought is that if you're tracking for 180 seconds stop it down further. Go to F5 or F6

Personally, I wouldn't stop it down this much as that greatly reduces the signal (f5.6 is half the aperture of f4). With thirds-focussing I've used this lens at f4.5, the corner stars are pretty good at this focal ratio.

30448785536_618ea389a8_h.jpg

Sometimes lens imaging can be a bit of a compromise between star shapes and signal-to-noise ratio.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a nifty fifty and found that (even for photographic subjects) I had to use it at at least f/2.8 (and that was a compromise)... For astrophoto I remember taking it to f/3.5 when I was thirsty for light, but that was pushing it... My lens had an astrophoto sweet spot at around f/4.

Hope it helps...

Cheers,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the 40mm EF pancake lens it makes a great everyday lens as so small and tidy, but for astro my preferred lens is a vintage 50mm all manual lens including p&p under £25 (plus £7 adaptor)  Fast at f2 and good star shapes so I only stop it down a little bit. I like and prefer prime lenses (none zoom).

On a 1100d

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

I found the Antares region very rewarding for the 50mm lens. 30 x 30sec, f/3.2 and ISO400. But anywhere along the Milky Way will be nice. I really like this lens for wide field.

 Antares.jpg

Good luck and clear skies!

HJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.