Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

Hello all, hopefully this is in the right place, i recently bought a 10" Skywatcher 250px Flextube, now i've had it a while i am looking to get some better quality eyepieces and now have my heart set on the Celestron X-Cel LX series as they seem good for the money and i really like the look of them,  so anyway my question is what would be the best choice if i could buy 2 of them from the whole set for my scope, i am getting the Celestron X-Cel x2 Barlow aswell at the same time.

Link with the sizes below.

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/celestron-eyepieces/celestron-x-cel-lx-eyepiece.html

 

i will get them all in time but for now 2 and the barlow would be fine.

 

any help would be great, as i have read about the lenth of scope being a factor etc, but i do not truley understand it yet

Thanks

Limey21.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you tried them?

Not all eyepieces suit everyone, I for one don't get on with Celestron X-cel lx eyepieces and get kidney beaning (Black spots) in my vision.

If you can try other peoples.....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love my eyepieces, especially the Starguiders, I think most of my  eyepieces may even work on the 250PX but your scope with its f/4.7 focal ratio may require some premium optics in order  to get the best out of the scope.
Its the reason I bought some  Tele Vue Delos eyepieces!

Edited by Charic
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At f4.7, I recommend you invest in a coma corrector for that dob to help any eyepiece better deal with the steep light cone.  I have the GSO 2" Photo-Visual Coma Corrector for Newtonian Telescopes and have parfocalized my eyepieces to negate the need for adding or removing spacers.  I can't believe I observed for 15 years without one.  It really cleans up the outer field by suppressing coma and flattening the field.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot the sizes? I would have the 7mm and 18mm for starters if you went for the X-CEL LX.

I have  the BST  3.2mm and a 5mm and they get used the least, I use them on the Moon,  but their just too powerful for my scope for anything else, powerful degrades the image?  in comparison to say an 8 -12mm. Their also part of the 'set' so I have to have them! I think the 2.3mm and 5mm X-CEL LX may be too much for your scope ( unless like me, you like to collect in sets?)
I have a 6mm  EP to match my focal ratio f/6.  Your ratio is f/4.7 - f/4.8  depending on how you formulate?  A-250mm or A-254mm  so your ratio   rounded up  would suggest a 5mm give you 250x power to match the scopes capability, but the UK weather wont allow you this freedom, without some visual issues affecting your enjoyment. I  can push to 375x on the Moon, but anything else  at 375x is a laugh!

 

Edited by Charic
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The magnifications which eyepieces will give for a specific telescope depend on its focal length. In the case of your scope, this is 1200mm. Divide this number by the focal length of the eyepiece to give the magnification. For example a 12mm eyepiece: 1200 divided by 12 gives a magnification of x100.

You probably have a 25mm eyepiece which came in the box with your telescope. Whilst not fantastic, these are generally good enough - so I'd make do with this for the moment. Later you may decide you want a low magnification 2" eyepiece - although more expensive, these can give really breathtaking views!

Considering two X-Cel LXs with the x2 Barlow, I'd go with the 18mm and the 12mm (effectively adding 9mm and 6mm through using the Barlow). This would give the following range of magnifications:

Old 25mm - x48

18mm - x66

12mm - x100

9mm - x133

6mm - x200

Magnifications of x100 and x133 would be useful for targets such as the planets. x200 is pushing towards the upper limit, but with good atmospheric conditions, would show tremendous detail on the Moon.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a set of X-Cels and I like them very much, but I do not have a scope as fast as yours. I would buy a single eyepiece, say the 9mm X-Cel and try it in your scope before committing to any more.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you kindly all for the advice, it has helped me quite a bit, this forum is a valuable resource.

Edited by Limey21

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MrGuGuZai
      Hi,currently owned 70mm refractor, want to upgrade and many suggested me to get 6" dobsonian.
      The only 6" dob i can find in my country is GSO 150mm/1200mm dob (https://www.opticaluniversescientificinstrument.com/products/gso-6-dobsonian-telescope), is this brand and specs ok?
      My main targets is planet and moon, maybe some star, i wonder is it hard to imaging planets? ill be using ccd eyepiece connected to laptop. 
      I live in malaysia city area, very less likely i will bring the scope to darker area because its pretty far from my home,and the scope quite big, so its dobsonian suitable for minor light population? 
      I heard that that dobsonian can affected by weather and cooling the scope be a big issue? 
      hope expert can give some advice. thanks
       
    • By Simple-Human
      Just wondering what peoples thoughts are on the pro's and con's of the different types of mounts out there? Do Dobsonian mounts have issues on non-flat surfaces (like a garden) or can Equatorial mounts ever have issues getting out of line too easily?
    • By Piero
      Very happy with it! Wish the sky were clear, but as we all know, when we buy astro equipment, it's cloudy! Argh!
      The telescope was collected from David Lukehurst at noon and then we travelled back to Cambridge. 
      John Nichol primary mirror: 37mm thickness, Suprax. Hilux coated. Optics 1/8 PV wavefront  1/27 wave RMS. Strehl .95. Secondary mirror: 62mm MA.
      Here a few photos:



       



       

       
       



       


    • By markastro
      Hi,
       
          Looking for a 12" DOB (or larger) which can be transported to Prestwick, Ayrshire. Any brand, as long as the telescope is optically sound and in good working order. I'm a reliable buyer who has bought and sold on this site before.
       
      Thanks,
       
      Mark
    • By Ships and Stars
      Hi all,
      Last night was the best night of astronomy I've had in my short time delving into this passion. It was simply incredible. Fortunately my dear friends the midgies have departed Scotland for another season. This means I can now stand at the scope without ingesting a lungful of tiny biting insects and concentrate on what I am observing. Always a plus!
      Two nights ago I went to my local dark spot with my 200p SW reflector. It was wonderful. LP map shows Bortle 4, but I would actually say it was a 3 or possibly a 'bright 2' when the lights go down a bit in the wee hours.
      Last night, I took the 20" dob and parked up. I am finding it easier and easier to move this beast around, but it's still a little bit of work to set up at the end of the day (literally). It can't all be so easy!
      I'm fairly new to astronomy and my scopes haven't seen a huge amount of use. After several failed attempts to get the GOTO working, I finally sussed it last night. It was just a few simple things really - small errors on my part such as a misplaced washer which blocked the azimuth from using its full range of motion, combined with a limited view at home which prevented me from doing a successful align. A huge relief to get the GOTO up and running, but I now feel a bit like I'm cheating!
      I don't feel guilty enough to not use the GOTO however😁 Frankly, it's brilliant and was putting objects bang in the centre of the EP.
      I arrived about 6pm yesterday so plenty of time to set up. I left my counterweights at home and thus ended up strapping a small vinyl bag of tools and tyre jack to the underside of the mirror box with a tie-down. Worked really well actually! Can fine tune by removing a spanner or two.
      A few drops of rain blew through just before dusk but then rapidly cleared off, so all systems go.
      I tripped over the power cord after my first successful align. And then did it again a minute later after my second align! Will need to tidy that arrangement up or put some of my glow tape on the cable. Plenty of practice then doing an alignment, haha.
      M57 Ring Nebula for starters, I've been playing with my Baader 36mm aspheric quite a lot lately, I like the wide views. The Ring was fairly small through the 36mm but bright and crisply defined with an apparent faint blue tint. I then swapped to the 21mm Ethos and OIII which stayed in the focuser most of the night. 
      Next stop was NGC6960, Western Veil Nebula or 'Witch's Broom Nebula' which was mind-blowing. It appeared as a silvery apparition which threaded right across the sky and extended well past the FOV from the 21mm Ethos. Scanning along its wispy tentacles was amazing. There's something unnerving about viewing it, it gives me goose-pimples, just otherworldly. The Eastern Veil and Pickering's Triangle in the central area were also clearly prominent, albeit slightly less luminous than 6960. The Veil was also clearly visible without the OIII, but with much more 'background noise', i.e. stars competing for attention.
      Following this, I slewed over to the Cocoon Nebula, but only saw a very dark lane practically void of stars. That was interesting in itself as it was so apparent by virtue of its darkness.. I don't know if I bumped the scope alignment of if I was just too impatient to punch another object in to the handset, but didn't spend a huge amount of time chasing it. In hindsight, I think I slewed to the wrong end of the dark lane. I'll find it next go.
      I then lined up on the Crescent Nebula which was easily visible, lots of fine filamentary details observable after some time studying it. A beauty.
      Next was Dumbbell Nebula which practically looked 3D through the big dob, just jumped right out at me. Another simply amazing sight. I spent quite a long time staring at it and could easily see the entire shape and structure extending from the 'Apple Core'. I remarked last night it looked like it was hanging inches in front of the scope. That's sheer aperture working I suppose!
      At the end, I spent some time just slewing around and having a mesmerising look across the sky, just taking in the depth and variable magnitude of stars that a big scope can display. I was already running on three hours' sleep from the previous night and by this time, I was starting to crash but was on a natural high. I crashed into the bed happily.
      Can't wait for another clear night with the big dob. I was a bit worried a few weeks ago that I'd bought something I didn't have the time or skill to fully appreciate, but getting the GOTO up and running and being able to rapidly slew to various objects really put things into perspective. My 200p is a wonderful, portable scope, but in comparison, 20" of aperture is simply a completely different level. It is like the difference between a small grainy 640px video and high definition 4k with the brightness cranked right up.
      Tonight I shall stay in, sleep well and dream about how much discarded glass is needed to cast a 36" mirror blank and how many years it would take me to figure it...
       
      Clear skies all
       
       
       
       

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.