Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Luis Campos

QHY163M first light (M42 in Ha)

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

So finally after QHY sorted all the issues with UB2 I was able to capture some data to give a good test run to my new QHY163M, I choose something "easy" in Ha as this will be my primary aim with this camera, as I image mainly from my light polluted back yard at the city :)

This was just a quick and dirty processing, to be honest I was like a zombie after a days work but I had to do it, it's been siitting for a few days waiting for processing, something is not very well I suspect with my dark or bias frames as I see a lighter band at the bottom of the image, seems like the amp glow did not callibrate out perfectly but that should be something or some bad frame in the stack so will have to see that in better detail...also yes, the microlenses reflection is a concern, very well visible on the brighter star, there is a simmetrical reflection around the star, I sure hope the gurus will find an easy way to deal with this in the future...maybe a PS plug in hehehe :)

Appart from that, it need more frames to clean up the dim areas, but the details are quite something for only 480mm f/l.

 

setup used:

 

QHY163M

SW ED80 at f/6

Baader Ha 7nm filter

EQ6 mount autoguided with ASI 120MM and a 50mm finder

Stack of 35x300 secs at Gain20 Offset100 USB traffic 5

Plus 15x60 secs + 10x15 secs for the core (still slightly overexposed)

 

So this is a first "draft" and I will get back at it for inprovement when I'm feeling fresher :p must check the callibration frames and smooth out the background.

 

Here on Flickr resized to 50%:

 

https://www.flickr.c...eposted-public/

 

Hope you enjoy,

 

Cheers,

Edited by Luis Campos
  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice result. Good to see the qhy camera version of this popular sensor. What's your verdict regarding performance so far? The zwo version is almost established by now. Qhy reported earlier that they had sorted out amp glow issues with their cooled cmos cameras. But having seen a dark image taken with the qhy, and one with the zwo, I have a feeling that zwo may be slightly better. Haven't done a side by side comparison though.

Thanks for sharing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, wimvb said:

Nice result. Good to see the qhy camera version of this popular sensor. What's your verdict regarding performance so far? The zwo version is almost established by now. Qhy reported earlier that they had sorted out amp glow issues with their cooled cmos cameras. But having seen a dark image taken with the qhy, and one with the zwo, I have a feeling that zwo may be slightly better. Haven't done a side by side comparison though.

Thanks for sharing

Thanks ;)

For sure there was quite a bit of problems with this camera at the begining, especially the problem with USB2 image dowlnoad hangs, after some trouble shooting QHY came up with an updated driver that solved this and now as this driver is using the cameras buffer in the correct way, USB transfer is no longer is no longer a problem, now we can lower USB traffic as low as 1 and still be ok as the image uses the buffer and only then downloads at watever speed via USB, this reduced the amp glow and it's now working much better. 10 min. subs are possible with good residual glow correction :)

Oh, and that heated window just works, I had nights with a dripping telescope and it was all good, no issues at all, it's a thing to consider ;)

There is still a little "polishing" to be made, I see some exposure variations on the frames that don't seem to affect much the final image, but I would klike to understand why this happens.

Cheers,

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice, will make a great wide field camera when attached to a fast short focal length lens ;) 

 

Whats wrong with your Mono DSLR's?  thought we would see more :) 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Coco said:

Very nice, will make a great wide field camera when attached to a fast short focal length lens ;) 

 

Whats wrong with your Mono DSLR's?  thought we would see more :) 

Thanks Guy :)

There´s nothing wrong with the mono DSLR really, it's just that these new cameras allow for much lower exposure time with prety much the same image quality... and...clear nights are becoming a rarity even here in Portugal so the faster the better :)

Cheers,

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like you have a wining combination there Luis,

I think the camera has loads of promise, and with the

smaller pixel size will be well suited for lenses as well.

well done

Paul

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, ultranova said:

Looks like you have a wining combination there Luis,

I think the camera has loads of promise, and with the

smaller pixel size will be well suited for lenses as well.

well done

Paul

Thanks Paul,

Indeed, also the versatility for lunar and planetary work is another great feature :)

I'm having lots of fun with it for sure ;)

Cheers

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Nicola Hannah Butterfield
      First image from my new NEQ6 Pro driven mount, all other images before this were static.
      Sky Watcher 200P prime focus, 10x 60's lights, darks, bias and flats. ISO 200
      Bortle 6
      Yes I know there is a plane track through it.
    • By alexbb
      I've been processing this image for quite a long now.
      I started acquiring data the last season when I only managed to shoot 3 panels with the Canon 6D through the Esprit 80 for a total of ~7h.
      This season I restarted and I added more data and covered a wider area. So a mix of portrait and landscape panels were planned and shot with the same scope and camera. Now every pixel represents at least 3-4h of integration, some have more.
      All the above were shot from Bortle 2-3 sites where I traveled sometimes even for an hour of exposure.
      To the RGB data I added 17.5h of Ha, same story with the panels. Some were oriented N-S, others E-W. These were shot with the SW 72ED and the ASI1600 from home and Bortle ~7.
      Then I figured out I still had time and I planned and shot 9 more panels of luminance with the 72ED and ASI1600, each consisting of 1h of exposure.
      I combined all of these into an image, processed it and for the Orion nebula and Running Man nebula I also blended some data I shot last season with the 130PDS and ASI1600 from home.
      Below it's my first final version of all data combined. You can watch it in full resolution on astrobin: https://www.astrobin.com/full/jni0w8/ or Flickr: https://flic.kr/p/2iBGUXq
       

    • By Chinapig
      Have decided to sell my trusty Equinox ED80 refractor.  Sharp optics, smooth two-speed Crayford rotatable focuser, fitted with a finder shoe, and complete with the original Skywatcher case and tripod-threaded mounting bracket.  A 3D-printed Bahtinov mask is included, along with a pair of mounting rings and a Losmandy dovetail plate.
      Collection preferred (Sussex coast, not far from Brighton), payment by bank transfer or cash on collection.
      Looking for £325.00 






    • By MarsG76
      The Orion Nebula imaged in RGB through a Celestron 8" SCT at F10 (2032mm FL) using a full spectrum modded and cooled Canon 40D. Tracked using a Celestron CGEM mount. Total exposure time was 1 hour and 24 minutes.
    • By MarsG76
      Hello All,
      I was wondering whether it's possible to image a DSO and capture any depth. Every 3D astro image online is faked so at the start of the year, I decided to image M42 six months apart.
      Back in March I posted a image of M42 imaged at f10, 2032mm FL through my 8SE on 28th February 2019. Than on 3rd September (setup and captured 15 second subs on 1 September) I captured M42 at the same focal length, same orientation and very similar subs for a total exposure of 1 hr 24 minutes. This was almost to the day exactly 6 months between the two images, so the earth was 300 million km away from the original position on the other side of the sun, furthest I could hope for imaging a 3D stereo pair.
      First attached is the image from September...

       
      I color matched the above image with the image from February, aligned them and below is the end result....

      As you can see there is no detectable 3D effect... There was a 3Dish effect but this was most likely due to the differences in processing of the two stacks and when I SCALE and rotate the two images to align them, and hence no 3D effect.
      Of course the stars and nebula are certainly not on a flat plain so I believe that the reason for the lack of any discernable depth is simply due to the distance of M42 resulting in  a very small angular shift in the stars, so small in fact, that it’s beyond the sensitivity of my 8” SCT, camera pixel resolution and tracking accuracy of the CGEM.
      Calculation of the expected motion of any parallax shift when the Orion Nebula is 1344 lightyears away and the distance of Earth being 149,600,000km from the Sun:
      1344LY = 1.2715e+16km
      Θ° = Tan-1(149.6e+6/1.2715e+16)
      Parallax Shift Θ” = 2 x 3600 x Θ
      Parallax Shift Θ” = 0.0048536712567150
      An angular motion of 0.005” was not picked up by my system that tracks with an average accuracy of about 1” RMS, with a camera sensor that has a resolution of 1.16”/pixel at 2032mm focal length with a 8” SCT. Even if I could get consistent tracking at the best accuracy that I have ever seen with my gear, 0.38” RMS, this is still well above 0.005” and well beyond the 40D sensor pixel resolution, and all this is without considering atmospheric distortion, obviously my setup is not even close to sensitive enough.
      This was a good project but unfortunately the distances of objects in the universe are too great, even objects classed as in our celestial “backyard”. If I didn’t try this experiment than I would be always wondering and curiosity would most likely make me try it eventually.
       
      Clear Skies,
      MG
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.