Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

Finally managed to have a proper go at Orion Widefield last weekend.

45x240s (3hours) with Canon 6D and 50mm f2.8 at ISO800.

No darks/bias/flats. Stacked in DSS and processed in PS.

 

I am pretty happy with the result but now it got me thinking, how do I go from this to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_Molecular_Cloud_Complex#/media/File:Orion_Head_to_Toe.jpg

Is it a matter of longer acquisition, or is that CCD territory?

 

Orion-Widefield-2.jpg

  • Like 16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely.

A lot of it is down to processing, the linked image is processed to suppress the stars and bring out the nebulae.  I suspect it is also a mosaic made up of several smaller images.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a complete noob at this but if you use Photoshop you can download a plugin with a set of actions. The plugin is called Astronomy Tools: http://www.prodigitalsoftware.com/Astronomy_Tools_For_Full_Version.html

They have actions to bring out the nebulae and make it pop etc, watch some videos first on it. But as said above it is down to processing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, D4N said:

Lovely.

A lot of it is down to processing, the linked image is processed to suppress the stars and bring out the nebulae.  I suspect it is also a mosaic made up of several smaller images.

 

I have been trying to do that, but after a certain point stars look like dust speckles and image looks very rough as opposed to the smooth image in that link.

 

 

33 minutes ago, Yamez said:

I am a complete noob at this but if you use Photoshop you can download a plugin with a set of actions. The plugin is called Astronomy Tools: http://www.prodigitalsoftware.com/Astronomy_Tools_For_Full_Version.html

They have actions to bring out the nebulae and make it pop etc, watch some videos first on it. But as said above it is down to processing.

yea that's what I tend to use. It works to a level, but I can't suppress enough without ruining image quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Longer subs, a dark sky site, any LP will be the killer, lots of processing skills, these cannot be learnt overnight.
Mod the 6D if it is'nt modded. although the 6D does Ha fairly well without modding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, wxsatuser said:

Longer subs, a dark sky site, any LP will be the killer, lots of processing skills, these cannot be learnt overnight.
Mod the 6D if it is'nt modded. although the 6D does Ha fairly well without modding

Location was exmoor, so as dark as it's going to get in this area.

Yea, I understand astro processing is a black art itself. And then you got so many different software with completely different processing techniques to make it more complicated :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, etunar said:

Location was exmoor, so as dark as it's going to get in this area.

Yea, I understand astro processing is a black art itself. And then you got so many different software with completely different processing techniques to make it more complicated :)

If you were at a dark site, then longer subs should be possible, 240secs seems short, of course depends on your gear and guiding.

To get the most out of a dslr you will need to dither, this will kill the colour noise and reveal stuff you would'nt believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think to make it look like that you need to use a star mask so you don't process the stars, or narrowband so they are tiny in the first place ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, wxsatuser said:

If you were at a dark site, then longer subs should be possible, 240secs seems short, of course depends on your gear and guiding.

To get the most out of a dslr you will need to dither, this will kill the colour noise and reveal stuff you would'nt believe.

Not sure if I can dither automatically with the star adventurer tracker... Unless it's part of guiding software?

 

7 hours ago, D4N said:

I think to make it look like that you need to use a star mask so you don't process the stars, or narrowband so they are tiny in the first place ;)

I am reading a bit more about star masks to see if it's viable when I have tons of it in the image. But yea, narrowband may be the next step...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you see this thread? Might be interesting

Stu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, etunar said:

I am pretty happy with the result but now it got me thinking, how do I go from this to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_Molecular_Cloud_Complex#/media/File:Orion_Head_to_Toe.jpg

Is it a matter of longer acquisition, or is that CCD territory?

Good image. As for the question:

Did you check out the photographer's website? Then decide to dedicate the rest of your life to this artform. Get good gear, have talent, some luck, and definitely a LOT of hard work.

Good luck.

Edited by wimvb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Stu said:

Did you see this thread? Might be interesting

Stu

Just saw it. Quite similar results. Although A7S is one capable camera at high ISOs!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, wimvb said:

Good image. As for the question:

Did you check out the photographer's website? Then decide to dedicate the rest of your life to this artform. Get good gear, have talent, some luck, and definitely a LOT of hard work.

Good luck.

I did look at his website. He doesn't list his equipment (as far as I can see), but clearly he has spent a lot of time in astrophotography considering his achievements and portfolio.

 

It's one of those things if I knew for sure it's beyond the capability of a dslr, I'd accept my fate :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an excellent image - thanks for sharing it.   The molecular clouds have come out beautifully, especially the Witch Head Nebula.  You don't say if your camera is modified - I assume not.  That said, the Canon 6D does give pretty good results on emission nebulae, even unmodified.  However, I would be tempted to saturate the colour a bit more.

I'm also familiar with Rogelio's stunning image and I'm quite in awe of it.  It can be found on https://www.astrobin.com/162866/ where he states that it is a 49 pane mosaic with 220 hours of total exposure time.  Here in the UK that would be a multi year project, maybe even a decade (or two)!    So I think that answers the question you posed - you need 70x more exposure time!!  His work is definitely something to aspire to but is definitely not beyond a DSLR like the Canon 6D.

Mark

Edited by sharkmelley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a dual rig would certainly help.  It would halve the number of years required to acquire the data!

Mark

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately it doesn't halve the number of years to gain experience and knowledge. Nor does it clear and darken our skies. He has access to really dark and clear skies, being relatively close to the deserts of Nevada.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, sharkmelley said:

That's an excellent image - thanks for sharing it.   The molecular clouds have come out beautifully, especially the Witch Head Nebula.  You don't say if your camera is modified - I assume not.  That said, the Canon 6D does give pretty good results on emission nebulae, even unmodified.  However, I would be tempted to saturate the colour a bit more.

I'm also familiar with Rogelio's stunning image and I'm quite in awe of it.  It can be found on https://www.astrobin.com/162866/ where he states that it is a 49 pane mosaic with 220 hours of total exposure time.  Here in the UK that would be a multi year project, maybe even a decade (or two)!    So I think that answers the question you posed - you need 70x more exposure time!!  His work is definitely something to aspire to but is definitely not beyond a DSLR like the Canon 6D.

Mark

thanks for that info, and bloody hell is all i can say :) 3 down 217 hours to go :) Well it's not just the exposure though, since it's a mosaic you are going to capture much more detail with the longer focal length unless it was a really low mp camera (which i doubt it). 

One question with these mosaics.. I assume they would be very difficult without guiding? How do you go back to exact same area of the sky at such a long focal length on different nights? I did a huge milky way pano at 50mm and that was difficult enough to make sure I captured everything correctly. With guiding you can easily go back to a previous spot, or am I understanding guiding wrong?

 

 

13 hours ago, wimvb said:

Unfortunately it doesn't halve the number of years to gain experience and knowledge. Nor does it clear and darken our skies. He has access to really dark and clear skies, being relatively close to the deserts of Nevada.

you are definitely right about experience and knowledge part. It's a long process to master it. I get to go back to cyprus for a week or two every summer so at least I get few nights of clear skies guaranteed every year. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, sharkmelley said:

That's an excellent image - thanks for sharing it.   The molecular clouds have come out beautifully, especially the Witch Head Nebula.  You don't say if your camera is modified - I assume not.  That said, the Canon 6D does give pretty good results on emission nebulae, even unmodified.  However, I would be tempted to saturate the colour a bit more.

I'm also familiar with Rogelio's stunning image and I'm quite in awe of it.  It can be found on https://www.astrobin.com/162866/ where he states that it is a 49 pane mosaic with 220 hours of total exposure time.  Here in the UK that would be a multi year project, maybe even a decade (or two)!    So I think that answers the question you posed - you need 70x more exposure time!!  His work is definitely something to aspire to but is definitely not beyond a DSLR like the Canon 6D.

Mark

Thanks btw, i was a bit shocked by the gear/exposure length of that photo I forgot say thank you. Yea 6D is not modded. I do landscape photography as well so I didn't want to mod it. But I think next logical step for me would be to have a modded camera and try to capture Ha wavelengths to improve details - at least that seems like the next logical step for me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best way to reshoot over several nights and have accurate pointing accuracy, is to do plate solving. It requires the mount to be computer controlled, as well as the right software. In essence, you take an image of the sky. Then use the stars in that image to figure out where you are pointing, and reposition the scope to the area you want to do your imaging. For mosaics, you would also use some sort of mosaic planning software to keep track of all the panels. Of course, once you're this dedicated, you will first research the area and try to add something new to the target. Something that makes the result stand out from other images. And that's where the talent comes in. Or as another photographer has called it, visualisation. Having the end product in mind, before you take the first exposure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, wimvb said:

The best way to reshoot over several nights and have accurate pointing accuracy, is to do plate solving. It requires the mount to be computer controlled, as well as the right software. In essence, you take an image of the sky. Then use the stars in that image to figure out where you are pointing, and reposition the scope to the area you want to do your imaging. For mosaics, you would also use some sort of mosaic planning software to keep track of all the panels. Of course, once you're this dedicated, you will first research the area and try to add something new to the target. Something that makes the result stand out from other images. And that's where the talent comes in. Or as another photographer has called it, visualisation. Having the end product in mind, before you take the first exposure.

Thanks Wim. This all sounds way beyond my capability at this stage (both skills and gear) but it's definitely good to learn for future.

 

4 hours ago, Calypsob said:

nicely done! which lens was this? 

It's the original sigma 50mm f1.4 lens (not the new art version).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By rorymultistorey
      Hi all,
      I've made a video about my experience looking through binoculars at deep space objects. I am NOT an observer. So I expect I got a few things wrong. Particularly the fact that it was impossible to film in complete darkness. I'd be really interested to hear whether I was way off the mark or not. And what other deep space objects are good to look at through a small pair of binos. Many thx in advance.
       
    • By Nicola Hannah Butterfield
      First image from my new NEQ6 Pro driven mount, all other images before this were static.
      Sky Watcher 200P prime focus, 10x 60's lights, darks, bias and flats. ISO 200
      Bortle 6
      Yes I know there is a plane track through it.
    • By alexbb
      I've been processing this image for quite a long now.
      I started acquiring data the last season when I only managed to shoot 3 panels with the Canon 6D through the Esprit 80 for a total of ~7h.
      This season I restarted and I added more data and covered a wider area. So a mix of portrait and landscape panels were planned and shot with the same scope and camera. Now every pixel represents at least 3-4h of integration, some have more.
      All the above were shot from Bortle 2-3 sites where I traveled sometimes even for an hour of exposure.
      To the RGB data I added 17.5h of Ha, same story with the panels. Some were oriented N-S, others E-W. These were shot with the SW 72ED and the ASI1600 from home and Bortle ~7.
      Then I figured out I still had time and I planned and shot 9 more panels of luminance with the 72ED and ASI1600, each consisting of 1h of exposure.
      I combined all of these into an image, processed it and for the Orion nebula and Running Man nebula I also blended some data I shot last season with the 130PDS and ASI1600 from home.
      Below it's my first final version of all data combined. You can watch it in full resolution on astrobin: https://www.astrobin.com/full/jni0w8/ or Flickr: https://flic.kr/p/2iBGUXq
       

    • By Ken Mitchell
      Hi all,
      For a long time I wanted to shoot this frame, probably from the early days of my astrophotography adventure.
      Finally after all these years I managed to get a decent result of the 'stuff' between these two beautiful nebulae. Fairly happy with the image but always looking for improvement.
      I hope one day to redo this all with a mono camera and filters. 
      Apart from NGC1499 , M45 and the Baby Eagle Nebula no idea what else is in the picture. If you happen to have an idea feel free to educate me.
       
      Some info on image and capturing:
      Widefield Pleiades to California.
      Taken over 2 nights with a total of 11hrs 25min integration.  
      With a stock Nikon d610 and Nikkor 85mm 1.8 objective.
      Tracking was done with the Skywatcher Star Adventurer.
      Lights and all calibrations frames were stacked in DSS.
      Processing was done in Adobe Photoshop CC using Adobe Raw, GradientXterminator plugin, HLVG plugin, Nik software plugins and Photokemi action set.
       
      Ken

       
    • By maxchess
      This may be an artifact, but I took this shot of the Orion Constellation from the Canary Islands and it showed a small nebula around Beteleguse. Do you think this is real? The shot was taken with a dual band filter which brings out the Ha.  I initially assumed it was a camera artifact, but I took more shots with different camera positions and it was still there.  There are some on-line articles about such a nebula. My first reaction was to edit it out, but I think it might be real and only visible because Beteleguse has dimmed by over 50%.  What do you think?
      Max
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.