Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

Thoughts on the skywatche 127 Mak for astrophotography


Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

i'm looking to by the 127 Mak next year for Moon photos, i awtched a short review of the scope and the guy briefly mentioned that AZ mounts may not be the best for astrophotography.

He didn't go into it at all, what are the reasons for that? I've not even held a proper mount so only have a vague idea how they rotate.

Happy new year :)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, moonomaly said:

Hi,

 

i'm looking to by the 127 Mak next year for Moon photos, i awtched a short review of the scope and the guy briefly mentioned that AZ mounts may not be the best for astrophotography.

He didn't go into it at all, what are the reasons for that? I've not even held a proper mount so only have a vague idea how they rotate.

Happy new year :)

 

I would think that a driven AltAz would be fine for lunar imaging which only requires bursts of short exposures to be stacked.

AltAz mounts do show field rotation so are not suitable for long exposure astro photography (deep sky stuff) but I think most stacking software will compensate for any field rotation seen over a minute of  so of video.

Comes down to budget really, an EQ mount is the preference but lunar imaging is certainly possible on an AltAz 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Altaz mounts motorised move in tiny left right up down movements which visually keep the objects in the field of view but does not account for field rotation because the earth is rotating. These sort of mounts are being use for Astrophotography but do have limitations because of the rotation issue. The no EQ challenge thread is showing what members are managing on this sort of mount with in the restrictions presented but use either camera and lens or fast short refractor, not SCT or MAKs.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

I have the set up you are thinking of, and first, I found the mount was ok for visual,but there was a lot of wobble when trying to take even short exposures, so much that I upgraded to an "EQ5 goto," which is now looking to be uprated to the EQ6, wife and finances allowing, I also found that with the Skywatcher 127 mak I was struggling to get the whole moon in the frame, I use an Olympus dslr, and a Nikon D 7200 dslr, not too sure if its me or just not the correct set up, I would be inclined, if doing it all again, to wait til I can afford the higher level equipment and buy it once, hope this doesn't put you off, and hope you can save a few bob from my experiences, good luck, Lum

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I use my AZ EQ6 in Alt Az mode in the summer for solar because I can take Ha and white light simultaneously. As Michael says it works ok over the period I take video. I ran into an issue when I imaged the transit of Mercury due to field rotation. I did mange to compensate though using tools in Photoshop but it was a major faff. EQ will usually make life simpler.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside, can anyone recommend a smooth-moving tripod for this little Celestron travel scope 70?

The one that came with it is pretty bad, but i don't want to spend too much money since i'll be getting the 127 soon, but in the meantime it's annoying that it's so rickety and juddery when trying to pan around.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, moonomaly said:

As an aside, can anyone recommend a smooth-moving tripod for this little Celestron travel scope 70?

The one that came with it is pretty bad, but i don't want to spend too much money since i'll be getting the 127 soon, but in the meantime it's annoying that it's so rickety and juddery when trying to pan around.

 

I would say save every penny for the new scope and live with the tripod you have. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have the spare cash then have a look around a few of the charity shops, every chance you will find something that is reasonably stable. The problem will be getting a photo head on it that can be set to the right resistance. I have no idea on which make may supply the better heads to these so you will need to look and sort of make adjustments in the shop to get an idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, moonomaly said:

EQ for the win then :) I can't believe the price of some of the mounts, more than the scopes!

Deep sky imagers want their mounts to track with an error not exceeding, say, a third of an arcsecond. There are nearly 1.3 million arcseconds in a full circle. It's a big ask!

On one of my setups the mount and scope cost the same as each other. On the other the mount cost twice the price of the scope. C'est la vie!

Olly

Edited by ollypenrice
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 years later...
On 01/01/2017 at 13:45, Glimpse111 said:

As mentioned above, its good only for planetary images and you don't need additional mount. For DSO neither scope or mount is good.

The Skymax 127 can be used for CCD  DSO Imaging with the correct set up

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 01/01/2017 at 14:27, happy-kat said:

Altaz mounts motorised move in tiny left right up down movements which visually keep the objects in the field of view but does not account for field rotation because the earth is rotating. These sort of mounts are being use for Astrophotography but do have limitations because of the rotation issue. The no EQ challenge thread is showing what members are managing on this sort of mount with in the restrictions presented but use either camera and lens or fast short refractor, not SCT or MAKs.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The perception that you must use an EQ Mount to capture decent DSO images is not exactly correct.

I have used my Celestron Evolution 9.25 with and without a 6.3 fr on Alt /AZ mount and along with the Atik Infinity Camera and its software captured many DSO objects over the past 3 yrs, field rotation is managed particularly well by the software, and 2 min plus exp stacked can produce good images, personally I never felt  the need to go above 45sec subs for my images with careful management of the Histogram its very simple.

Eric

Edited by 2STAR
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By StargazerUK
      Hi All,
      I am currently researching which setup to purchase as my first proper scope (once they are back in stock).
      I thought I had settled on the Skywatcher Explorer 130ps AZ GTi but then I saw the Skywatcher Star Discovery 150i for just a little more money.
      Could anyone please tell me the difference between the 2 OTA's (other than the different aperture size), and also the difference between the 2 mounts?
      I realise that the AZ GTi can be modified to run in EQ mode whereas the Star Discovery can't.
      Can the Star Discovery view all the way to the zenith or does the OTA catch the mount or tripod before it gets there?
       
      Thanks
    • By tooth_dr
      I've been trying to image a couple of galaxies per night, one pre and one post flip.  On early Saturday morning at 1:30am I changed over to M82, and acquired 63 x 3 mins subs, OSC, totalling 3 hours and 9 minutes of data. 
      Camera: ZWO 2600MC at -10 deg C, gain 100, offset 50
      Telescope: Skywatcher 250PX (blue tube), 1200mm F4.7
      Mount: Mesu e200
      Guiding: ZWO OAGv2, 290MM, PHD2
      Filters: None
      Software: APT for capture, APP and PS for processing
       
      I havent really had a chance to get much use out of this camera since I bought it in December, and I havent processed many OSC images before.  I've a bit of work to do, but still very happy with the quality of the data for just 3 hours of integration time.  I would like to add some Ha to this, but purposely didnt bother during the recent clear spell, as it was moonless nights and I gathered some broadband data on other targets instead.
       
      CC welcome.
      Adam

    • By Turbocoo
      As above looking for scopes for both these mounts. Thanks 
    • By chrobakx
      Selling the Sky-watcher r.a. motor drive for eq2/cg3 mount.
      I was using it on my Celestron Astromaster 130eq. I was able to do some astrophotography with it, 15-20  seconds exposure time.
      Price £27 plus postage
      Payment method: PayPal, family and friends method or commercial and  buyer will pay fee 3% extra
       




    • By chrobakx
      Recently I acquired the eq3 mount and now I'm looking for Skywatcher Dual Axis or enhanced dual axis Motor Drive for this Mount .
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.