Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

wimvb

A cluster and a bubble

Recommended Posts

M52 and NGC 7635 (the Bubble nebula)

16 18 x 10 minutes exposures at ISO 200

SW 150PDS on AZ EQ6GT, Pentax K20D (not modified)

The camera picks up some Ha. Enough for the bubble to show, but not enough for the background Ha. I'm not sure if I should keep the faint red or get rid of it and get an even background.

Comments welcome.

M52_bgBoost.jpg

Edited by wimvb
note to self: learn to count
  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hej Wim

nice shot!

Just wonder why you run the camera on ISO200? Is the Pentax that noisy? I can usually set my Canon 60Da to ISO1600 before I notice an increase noise with the natural cooling in wintertime Sweden. At ISO1600 you could have got 128 exposures in the same time with the same light intensity (or go for more signal in each sub). I am in Australia right now and tried some AP with my wife's Canon 70D last night. I have no EQ drive so I limited it to 20 s exposures at ISO1600 and the result was terrible due to noise so I have given up, but down here it is 30 °C at night.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My camera is so noisy that anything higher than iso 400 is a waist of effort. I tried the Iris neb last month with iso 1600 and yesterday with iso 400. The lower iso in combination with the lower temperature made all the difference. Besides, iso in modern dslrs (or in my case, even ancient), is basically the same as gain in astro cameras. It just amplifies the electric signal. With low noise, this can better be achieved by stretching during post processing.

I can dig up the two images of the Iris, and post for comparison.

To combat noise in my images, I now use a combination of Olly's technique (bad pixel map and aggressive hot pixel filter) and darks. I found out that with the longer exposure times that come with guiding, just using Olly's technique isn't enough anymore. During post processing, I heavily rely on PixInsights noise reduction methods.

In short, I need to save up for a new camera.

Which part of Australia are you in? Doing marine biology, I guess you are at the Small Barrier Reef?

Ha det bra, och gott nytt år

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice shot Wim, I would leave the faint red in the image as you can see it is nebulosity and not gradient so contributes to the overall image 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Andy. It's not as obvious in the jpeg posted here as in the original .xisf file in PixInsight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a comparison image of my camera's performance at ISO 1600 and ISO 400.

It's a crop from a single frame. Debayered in PixInsight and stretched using STF as a permanent stretch (also in PI). Saved as jpeg.

Scope: SW 150PDS + Baader CC, camera: Pentax K20D (not modified)

Like I wrote before, anyting over ISO 400 isn't worth it, unless the temperature is in the negative numbers.

ISO-comparison_PentaxK20D.jpg

Edited by wimvb
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wim,

yes, that is much more noise than my Canon 60Da, so saving up for another camera sounds like a good plan - you clearly deserve it. My next one will probably be one of the cooled ZWO-ASI cameras - clearly a lot of bang for the buck.

Good guess, I am on Lizard Island Research Station on the northern part of the GBR. Fantastic dark sky. Nearest city is Cairns 200 km south so no light pollution whatsoever even at the horizon - next time I go here I should bring some AP gear to keep me up at night!

I attach a cropped sub from one of my last images from back home (November), so ca 0°C. It is from the centre of the Pacman Nebula at ISO1600 and I have a hard time even finding a hot pixel. I do not bother using darks. The final stacked image is here:

 

IMG_2371 crop to show noise.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed the much lower noise level of Canon cameras when I did some processing for other people. It's nice to be able to process an image and not needing to start with noise reduction. At the moment, TGVDenoise and MultiscaleMedianTransform are my best friends. And Dynamic Crop is a close relative. Here's my starting point for the above image (stacked, DBE applied and colour calibrated)

light_BINNING_1_integration_dbe_bn_cc.jpg

ZWO is also on my list, the ASI1600 mono cooled has started to prove itself. But by the time I can afford a new camera, maybe a mono version of the ASI071 will be available (APS-C, dslr size sensor). Otoh, I also have Atik on my wish list. Smaller sensor, but proven track record.

Enjoy your stay "down under".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wim,

my sometimes very understanding wife says I am allowed to buy the ASI1600MMC and I have my finger on the trigger. The first plan is to use it to collect Ha to add to my DSLR RGB images, but the chip is just a bit too small to be perfect so like you I think that I should probably wait and see if the ASI071 comes out in a mono version (I would be very troubled if that happened a week after I bought an ASI1600MMC). Even the colour ASI071 seems a fantastic option compared to most DSLRs since it is chilled.

By the way, I see on amazon.co.uk that you can get a 60Da used for around 400 GBP - 1/3 of the price of the ASIs. I really like my 60Da, both for the low noise and the increased Ha sensitivity. Here you can see the extra Ha that I managed to get out of the bubble with that camera:

http://www.astrobin.com/full/241991/B/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with the asi071 mono (if it will come) is probably going to be a need for larger filters. I haven't done the math, but likely even 36 mm filters may be on the small side. The filter set will be more expensive than the camera.

I have considered getting a cheap canon, but  I believe it was @ollypenrice who put it wisely "buy once, cry once". With my light pollution (not too bad, but enough to be a nuisance and a limit to what I can image), I am taking the step to Ha-RGB. I have also thought the colour asi to be a good alternative for cooled and modded dslr. The asi071 will fill a gap in the market. That would take care of the noise, but not the light pollution problem.

Cheers,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By gorann
      Friends,
      Last summer Wim @wimvband I entertained ourselves with processing freely available data (subs) from the Liverpool Telescope, since Sweden is too light for AP that time of the year. I was just told that one of my attempts on the Bubble made today's APOD! Yes I know, the data is from The Liverpool Telescope, a 2 m RC scope on La Palma, so not collected with my own stuff, but I did the stacking (Nebulosity) and processing (PS).
      Now I just have to come down to earth again...
      https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap180205.html

    • By Vicky050373
      NGC 7635 The Bubble Nebula in Cassiopeia
      Imaged using Atik 314L monochrome CCD camera and William Optics FLT-110 refractor on NEQ6 Pro SynScan mount
      10 x 300 second subs in H-alpha

    • By Vicky050373
      The result of one of my imaging sessions from Kelling Heath Autumn Equinox star party NGC 7635 The Bubble Nebula in Cassiopeia Imaged using Atik 314L monochrome CCD camera and William Optics FLT-110 refractor on NEQ6 Pro SynScan mount 10 x 300 second subs in H-alpha
    • By Dec
      Hi here's an image I took over the last couple of weeks. Its 30 x 10mins of Ha and 9 x 10mins each of RGB. I'm relatively new to AP so still getting to grips with everything (especially processing).
      I've read on here that using Ha as a lum file is not advisable so would really appreciate any advice on combing Ha with RGB in this type of image. Would adding Lum, Oiii or S data help.
      All feedback would be gratefully received.
      Thanks
       
      Dec
       
       
       

    • By michaelmorris
      My yearly four-day autumn sojourn to Kelling Heath yielded only one picture this year.  I used my Astro-modified Canon 1100D to capture 28 x 300 second subs of the area around M52 in Cassiopeia. The camera was cooled down to just 6 degC by my homemade camera cooler and this certainly led to a relatively low-noise image.
      The cloud we had led to the brighter stars having large haloes around them, which I had tried to reduce a bit.
       

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.