Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Dobson or newtonian on a dobson mount?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
36 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

 

At one time TV did a really nice mini Dobsonian mount in wood for their small refractors. I can find no trace of it these days though, and sometimes think of making one.

Olly

Me too Olly :)

I have often thought of making a 'Dobfractor' :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Peter Drew said:

Not all alt-az's are Dobsonians but most Dobsonians are alt-az's.   :icon_biggrin:

But not all... Someobody in my old UK astrosoc had a large Beacon Hill 'Dob' set at a built-in equatorial tilt. It's the only such device I've ever seen. I don't remember ever seeing it in action but I did see it around.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Timebandit said:

 

Maybe we should just call it a reflector telescope on a Dobson mount?

 

I like that one, but the other day I pointed a reflector telescope at the shop and the seller said to me 2 times, he repeated like a parrot: it was a Newtonian telescope because I was calling it a reflector. What can I do? he wants the telescope to be a Newtonian. 

I don't know what's the matter exactly with him. (I will never know for sure)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, N3ptune said:

I like that one, but the other day I pointed a reflector telescope at the shop and the seller said to me 2 times, he repeated like a parrot: it was a Newtonian telescope because I was calling it a reflector. What can I do? he wants the telescope to be a Newtonian. 

I don't know what's the matter exactly with him. (I will never know for sure)

 

Perhaps he was trying to differentiate between the newtonian design and other reflecting designs ?.

Who knows :dontknow:

It's a clear night here tonight so I'm not really bothered what folks want to call the 12" aperture telescope that I'm getting wonderful views though :grin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John said:

Perhaps he was trying to differentiate between the newtonian design and other reflecting designs ?.

Who knows :dontknow:

It's a clear night here tonight so I'm not really bothered what folks want to call the 12" aperture telescope that I'm getting wonderful views though :grin:

You are lucky to have a clear night tonight, here, we have heavy glaze frost. I consider myself extremely fortunate to have electricity right now, it can go out any time.

--> I wish you have a great observation with your 12" aperture instrument.

This is it:

9sqxNmQ.jpg?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, N3ptune said:

You are lucky to have a clear night tonight, here, we have heavy glaze frost. I consider myself extremely fortunate to have electricity right now, it can go out any time.

--> I wish you have a great observation with your 12" aperture instrument.

This is it:

9sqxNmQ.jpg?1

Thanks and I hope your electricity stays on !

That frost does not look nice at all :shocked:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pouring more petrol on the flames....

Most mounts labelled as Dobsonians aren't. They should be called Fork mounts instead. A proper Dobsonian should have some sort of cradle on/in which the telescope rests, and what look like wheels (or part of a wheel) on either side which rides in a recess on the base. If the telescope pivots on a spindle attached to one or two uprights, it's a version of the fork mount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.