Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss_winners.thumb.jpg.9deb4a8db27e7485a7bb99d98667c94e.jpg

PESKYWAABBIT

First time out with new scope, things didn't go so well

Recommended Posts

Been waiting for days in anticipation for the first clear night with my new SW 200P reflector and HEQ5 mount.  I found instantly that I couldn't locate the North Star due to bloody trees and also the moon was so bright it made all other objects so much more dim in my scope. The Polaris Alignment scope LED's are so bright I couldn't align any star in the scope at all, let alone see through it. I did check it was clear and it didn't have the cap on or the weight bar obstructing it. I tried adjusting the brightness but found no settings in the SynScan handset for my model! I also found out that my clock ring rotates even if I lock them to the specific axis. (Annoying)

In the end, instead of just messing around trying to align the damn thing I just span it around and zeroed in on the moon and other stars. I found pretty quickly that I can only focus on the moon IF I use a 2X barlow lense in the chain and that the focuser doesn't move back as far as my older Vixen refractor. 

Anywayyyy to make the most out of the full moon and the fact it was clear I took some photos and made a mosaic out of 54 individual photo's I took. The original photo is 388MB, so I've uploaded a much smaller version.

My first proper AstroPhotography photo, any thoughts or solutions to the problems I found on my first night out? I'm hoping the next time I go out, it's much smoother.

Enjoy.

- Pesky

TheMoon1680x1680.png

  • Like 16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a good start, considering the issues you mention.
Practice makes perfect with the setup, keep at it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a very nice image Tom, great start!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow you did well to make a 54 pane mosaic after having all those problems.

For the focusing issue, did you take the 2" adaptor off of the focuser?

I've never had much fun aligning with a polar scope but then I'm quite far North so need my head on the ground to even see it.  Hopefully you get your gremlins sorted out and have better luck next time out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you've had a good taste ( :eek: ) of things that can make viewing a bit difficult! But, rather than go into the house and hang yourself, you persevered and brought back a photo of the Moon - as taken under some trying circumstances! Congratulations! You've passed the 'Acid-Test' of learning what 'seeing' is all about. And come back with a good prize for your efforts!

That's a very nice Moon. I'd say you have been through a "Perfect-Storm" of nasty things working against you. At least it couldn't get much worse for a 'First-Light' for your new scope & you. And I'm sure you've learned a great deal in the process. This side of winding-up dropping a house on some nasty, old woman with a broom and being swarmed by Midgets singing to you - next time will be better!

Follow The Yellow Brick-Road!

Dave

Edited by Dave In Vermont
chr.
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Focusing. Please check that you only have the one size adaptor in place for the eyepiece you are using. I think these ship with the 1.25 adaptor sat inside the two inch one. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice image given all your trials and tribulations. Got to get better with practice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really good when you salvage something out of a disaster night. The Moon photo is great.

Edited by Mak the Night

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, D4N said:

For the focusing issue, did you take the 2" adaptor off of the focuser?

 

12 hours ago, happy-kat said:

Focusing. Please check that you only have the one size adaptor in place for the eyepiece you are using. I think these ship with the 1.25 adaptor sat inside the two inch one. 

To answer both of these questions, I swear the 2" adapter was not in the focuser at the time but instead in the box when I got it. I have no 2" eye pieces and my T mount for my DSLR is a straight 1.25". I do need to get myself a 2" T mount extender tube as I've heard taking photos through a 2" straight is much, much better.

I was failing to get any focus with the 1.25" adapter and a 10mm eyepiece. But as soon as I used a x2 Barlow lense, I could actually acquire focus.

Also, is it just me or is a full moon a pest for viewing other stars? It lit up my whole garden and I found it difficult to find a few stars myself. I assume a crescent moon is much more suitable for seeing deep space!

Thanks for the positive feedback with my photo, appreciate it.

- Pesky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice photo and a good result for the 1st time out.

Deep sky objects, in the main, look much better when there is no moon in the sky. Galaxies and nebulae are particularly easily washed out even by a cresent moon and either vanish or are very difficult to find.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A new moon, or as close as possible to it is best for viewing everything.  Except the moon of course! :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice. I would cut down either the exposure time and the ISO setting. This way you get a slightly more underexposed image which is much easier to tweak in PS or other programs than an overexposed image.

The full Moon and just post or prior to full is not easy due to wash out, the terminator provides the best area to play with the focus. Which is what I do.

What program did you use to stitch all the 56 panels together with?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont be too worried about not seeing the polar through the polar scope first time around. I too had problems first time out with my eq6. I did everything wrong. Left the cap in the top, didn't even realize the weight bar extended out further only to find I still could not see anything. LED fully up and full down but nothing so packed up thinking it was the equipment.

These have a very small fov and next night out I took my time and even with the led nearly at full I saw the polar star. I held a lazer pointer against the  scope to make sure I was roughly in the right area and find this helps me.

 

Polar Scope LED should be in the utilities function list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By joelshort
      Note: This scope is in the USA, so international shipping may prohibit a sale. However, without the heavy Scopeguard case the shipping cost will be substantially reduced.
      I can provide a full frame image taken with this scope if anyone is interested.
      Reduced to £3155 for the complete package.  I will consider offers, but this is already close to my bottom price.
      I’ve decided to sell my Takahashi Epsilon Ɛ-180. The scope and optics are in good cosmetic and optical shape. There are a few minor tool marks around the collimation screws but otherwise no issues. The primary mirror is centered with a Catseye Hotspot.
      The scope will come with the Takahashi corrector, rings and top plate ($457 add-on), front cover, Scopeguard case ($500 add-on), BT Technologies dovetail bar ($150 add-on) (has a blemish but is super solid), Astrozap dew shield and cap with focus mask ($175 ad-on), Precise Parts Tak corrector to M48 adapter ($110 add-on), the Takahashi collimation tools, an M68x1 male to M54x0.75 female and a M54x0.75 male to 2" compression ring adapter ($100? add-on) (these allow you to use the scope visually with 2" eyepieces.)
      I replaced the stock focuser (included) with an Optec TCF-Leo focuser with temp probe. With the included scope adapter and Tak corrector adapter this is a $1400 add-on.
      Total new cost = £5900
      All of this for £3155 plus shipping.







    • By SimM
      Setting up my new HEQ5. The same issues are present (by design) on RA setting circles on the other mounts?
      Instructions missing for RA setting circle thumbscrew
      Can the RA setting circle actually be used as a normal setting circle - it seems just "cosmetic". It's either locked or slips when free to rotate.
      Simon
    • By willcastle
      Has anyone used the celestron lithium powertank (the small one, not the pro version) with a skywatcher HEQ5?
      It looks like it should be perfect but that is coming from someone who is relatively clueless
      From the skywatcher specs, it looks like the mount needs 2 amps of current, and the powertank supplies 3, so that should be good?
      It also looks like the power cable is a double-ended tip-positive 2.1 mm plug, so i assume that even though it doesn't have one of those 12V car battery inputs, it shouldn't matter right?
      (just to save people some time, i'm not going to bother with a lead battery / leisure battery / jump-start pack / etc)
    • By maxchess
      I am trying to plan out my longer term equipment strategy, rather than go for impulse purchases and would like some advice on dual mounting scopes.

      At present I have a roll-off shed with steel pier in concrete block. The mount is an HEQ5-Pro, stellar tuned and belt driven which is supposed to have an astrophotography payload of around 11Kg.  My main camera is an ASI294MC. Guide camera Lodestar x2. 
      I switch between two scope set ups.  (Weight for both includes cameras and filter draw.)
      •    ES102 with 50mm guide scope, FL=714, weight is 7.5 Kg
      •    C8 (not edge) with 6.3  FR and OAG, FL = 1260,  Weight is 8kg
      So clearly I cannot mount both on my HEQ5 Pro.
      One of the reasons for going with a fixed pier in a shed is that once set up and aligned, I can just push back the roof, align, focus and get imaging in 5 mins.  However as targets change I need to swap scopes, rebalance, rewire etc. Not a massive effort but I am wondering if I could dual these scopes and perhaps eventually add something like a WO GT71 FL= 420, weight 2.93  for the wide stuff.  So total weight around 19kg.  Then maybe in the future go for a Mono camera and filter wheel and even perhaps an C9.25 Edge pushing the weight to around 23kg. 
      To do this I would plan to buy a CEM 60    mount that claims a payload of 27.2 kg, although it is not clear if this is imaging, although I can’t see why anyone would buy one just for visual. I would then just guide with the OAG.
      So I have two questions:
      Is this a realistic strategy or would I loose guiding accuracy by loading the mount in this way. Perhaps even compared to keeping the HEQ5-Pro and swapping when necessary.  Or maybe just forget the GT71 and C9.25
      If I do go down this route, what is the best way of dual or triple mounting? I have read that mounting two dissimilar scopes side by side risks unbalancing the setup, but also that mounting the ES102 on ADM rings risks flexure.
      Any other advice or observations most welcome.
      Thanks
      Max
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.