Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

GTom

Canon 6D - stacking short vs long subs?

Recommended Posts

I just upgraded to a 6D and checking in theory, what is the ideal ISO and frametime for the new setup.

Looking at the read-noise characteristics, ISO should not be kept low - however, increasing the ISO kills the full well capacity, at ISO3200 I got only 2400e-(!), which quickly leads to DR problems. I feel ISO1600 could be a meaningful compromise between FW and read noise.

Regarding noise and frametimes: I know, long subs are in general preferred. Looking at the overall S/N formula, in theory I'd loose only about 20% on the S/N if I shoot 10 subs instead of one long exposure  thanks to the ~3e- read noise.

Is my maths right? If the read noise is significantly below 5e-, can we really go in photon counting mode/save a lot on mounts?

 

 

I made a quick excel plot on the story: practically ISO3200 delivers the same results using 10 frames as 5 frames shot at iso 800.  I added 0.2e-/sec/pixel dark noise (~5°C cooled eos 6D value) and a signal, that generates 150electrons in a 2 minutes sub, I didn't add photon noise. 

 

6D SNR.JPG

Edited by GTom
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally i try to use as low an ISO as the situation allows, i certainly wouldn't raise the ISO to 1600 if i can get what i need with twice the sub length at half the ISO.

I  always thought that the lower the ISO the higher the dynamic range, therefore the better the image.

Most noise can be removed in post processing and i use a crop sensor, your FF will have much less noise at a given ISO than my APS-C.

I have noticed that my images are now much better now i can take longer exposures and lower the ISO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, MARS1960 said:

Personally i try to use as low an ISO as the situation allows, i certainly wouldn't raise the ISO to 1600 if i can get what i need with twice the sub length at half the ISO.

I  always thought that the lower the ISO the higher the dynamic range, therefore the better the image.

Most noise can be removed in post processing and i use a crop sensor, your FF will have much less noise at a given ISO than my APS-C.

I have noticed that my images are now much better now i can take longer exposures and lower the ISO.

That's the nikon story, they got low read noise at low ISO.

BTW you can't exploit the full DR thanks the ADC, 6D is in reality capped at around 11EV, which it can still deliver at ISO1600.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, MARS1960 said:

I  always thought that the lower the ISO the higher the dynamic range, therefore the better the image.

You do get more dynamic range at lower ISO but there are a couple of problems - photons can be discarded (quantization error) and read noise is proportionally higher, so ISO setting is a bit of a compromise.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GTom said:

I just upgraded to a 6D and checking in theory, what is the ideal ISO and frametime for the new setup.

Looking at the read-noise characteristics, ISO should not be kept low - however, increasing the ISO kills the full well capacity, at ISO3200 I got only 2400e-(!), which quickly leads to DR problems. I feel ISO1600 could be a meaningful compromise between FW and read noise.

Regarding noise and frametimes: I know, long subs are in general preferred. Looking at the overall S/N formula, in theory I'd loose only about 20% on the S/N if I shoot 10 subs instead of one long exposure  thanks to the ~3e- read noise.

Is my maths right? If the read noise is significantly below 5e-, can we really go in photon counting mode/save a lot on mounts?

 

 

I made a quick excel plot on the story: practically ISO3200 delivers the same results using 10 frames as 5 frames shot at iso 800.

 

6D SNR.JPG

Practically thats true but i would much rather (depending on object,LP,etc)take 5 subs of 12mins at ISO800 than 10 subs of 6mins at ISO3200.

Edited by MARS1960
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, MARS1960 said:

Practically thats true but i would much rather (depending on object,LP,etc)take 5 subs of 12mins at ISO800 than 10 subs of 6mins at ISO3200.

I completely understand, 2EV is a factor 4x in well capacity, which cannot be compensated by only 2x the number of subs (should be 4x). However, speaking of a DSLR, there is also the dark noise.

There is no perfect cooling for DSLR-s, even a cold-finger cooled unit could accumulate more dark noise during the high-temperature part of the shooting.

Further consideration is the mount. Of course, someone equipped with a super stable heavy mount, wind-protected dome, OAG, etc -> 20+min subs are not an issue. Put a 500mm lens on an astrotrac, ungided: you can

forget anything beyond 2-3minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 13/12/2016 at 09:58, moise212 said:

That is a good report and kind of confirms what I expected. Longer subs produce more noise but also captures more signal and that total exposure time is what counts ultimately (that was my take away). 

However the difference isn't massive, I think people spend too much time analysing rather than just getting on with it (good for those with time to analyse it for us). To me it would be better to just stick to something that works well for you which allows you to add data to previous sessions easily.

I limit my exposures to 5 minutes at f/4 at ISO1600 on the 6D. If this isn't optimal I am not too bothered as processing the image "properly" will have a much larger impact.

What isn't shown in those findings is the theory that taking 7200 x 1 second sub exposures will produce a very similar image. I believe that it won't...It will still be impressive what you can get from 1 second exposures but nowhere near as good as increasing the sub length to a specific point.

Edited by StuartJPP
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/12/2016 at 17:09, GTom said:

I completely understand, 2EV is a factor 4x in well capacity, which cannot be compensated by only 2x the number of subs (should be 4x). However, speaking of a DSLR, there is also the dark noise.

There is no perfect cooling for DSLR-s, even a cold-finger cooled unit could accumulate more dark noise during the high-temperature part of the shooting.

Further consideration is the mount. Of course, someone equipped with a super stable heavy mount, wind-protected dome, OAG, etc -> 20+min subs are not an issue. Put a 500mm lens on an astrotrac, ungided: you can

forget anything beyond 2-3minutes.

Here is some 20min cooled DSLR H-a for you mate :) not the best H-a of this target ever in the world but its possible to get the dark noisedown far enough and get those sub length without a dome on a humble HEQ5, mind you the 1000D used is not close to the quality of the 6D either.... 

Note this was with my RGB 1000D not the Mono modded one.

Highly Cropped.

Veil-kappa-sigma-mono_v3.jpg

Edited by Adam J
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Adam, that's a great shot! Proper cooling is certainly a witchcraft i have to learn...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Nikolas74
      As i would like to give it a try with a color camera and therefore need the funds i am selling my Mono camera setup.
      All come in original boxes in excellent working condition, filters have been in the filter wheel since i bought them.
      Atik 383l+ Mono boxed with all extras £900
      Astrodon Ha 3nm 36mm boxed £620 SOLD
      Astrodon Oiii 3nm 36mm boxed £620 SOLD
      Astrodon Lum 36mm boxed £180 SOLD
      I will be happy to send any photos to someone who is interested.
      Payment via Paypal in Uk Pounds or Euros (buyer will pays the fees if any)
      Safe and Secured shipping with tracking number. Postage expenses by me.
      Many thanks
      NikolasP.
       



    • By Adumbleton
      Wanted: Celestron Nightscape 8300 CCD camera to replace a faulty unit.
       
    • By crossingsymmetry
      Greetings everyone.
      I recently scored a great deal on facebook marketplace and bought Skywatcher Skymax 180 mm Maksutov-Cassegrain Telescope (f/15) with EQ6R-pro mount. I understand that long focal length telescopes are more suitable for planetary imaging. However, as I am tight on budget, I would like to use the same scope for deep-sky astrophotography. I have Canon Rebel T5 DSLR camera that I am using for taking images. Without autoguiding and a decent polar alignment, I can get ~30 seconds long shots without any star trailing, but that's not sufficient for imaging objects like M51. I would like to be able to integrate longer, say few minutes, thus would like to purchase an autoguider.  Here are some specific questions I have.
      1). The telescope comes with an 8 x 50 straight-through finder.  If I were to use it as a guidescope, what type of image integration time can I expect? Has anyone done autoguiding for f/15 scope with an 8x50 or other finderscopes?
      2). If the integration time will be an issue with the 8x50 finder scope, I am open to purchasing an off-axis-guider. However, considering the narrow field-of-view of Mak-180 telescope, I am concerned about not having enough photons from guidestar for autoguiding. For instance, with my DSLR camera, I need to integrate 20-30 seconds to see the nearby stars in M51. What type of OAG and camera would I need to autoguide with my scope? Are there affordable cameras (~$200) that would do the job for me? Would ASI120MM Mini Monochrome (~$150) do the job? What about OAG?
      I plan to use phd2 software for autoguiding rather than relying on the build-in guide port on the mount.  Instead of integrating for hours, I am planning to do DSS stacking of few mintues long multiple shots, hopefully this will put less strict requirements on the autoguider.
      In case this information is relevant: with my current setup, I have no issue pointing my scope to a desired deep-sky object, track the object within the field-of-view of my DSLR camera for hours using the mechnical tracking of the EQ6 mount. For instance following is a single raw image of Ring nebula taken with 30 seconds shot.  But it is not enough for generating high-quality images. 

       
      Thank you in advance for your help.
       
      Regards,
      Jay
       
    • By joelshort
      I'm selling a 1 year old Moravian G3-16200M Mark II camera. Please note this is the newer Mark II camera with faster downloads (on my NUC computer it was 9s.). Everything is in like new condition.
      The Moravian G3-16200M MKII has a class 2 chip and the standard cooling. The camera cames with an M48 nose piece (unused), power supply with both USA and European plug, 10ft USB cable and hard case. There is also a 17mm extension that can be used if you purchase separately the larger M68 adapter. There are currently 2 read out lines that completely disappear with active cooling and proper image calibration, as is typical with a class 2 sensor.
      £2240 PLUS SHIPPING, no fee for paypal.  NOTE: ships from USA.
    • By paulobao
      Hello everyone,
       
      QHY5-II (MONO) - as new with original box and acessories.
      Great guiding camera!
      Check some photos at Astrobin or Stargazers Lounge under "paulobao".
       
      I just quit the hobby and sold all my gear (FS102, G11, QSI532, etc...).
       
      Price 70 GBP shipping included.
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.