Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

gnomus

M31 - Revisit

Recommended Posts

One of the first targets I went for when getting into the AP malarkey was, naturally, M31.  I thought that it might be time to revisit the scene of my earlier crime: https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/256542-m31-reprocess-from-mid-september-2015/

This was taken over three nights at the end of November.  The ED80 has been swapped out for a WO Star 71 (Mk I) and I used a Moravian G2-8300 in place of the Atik 383 on the earlier effort (same chip, of course).  This time around I tried not to go too overboard with the stretch or with the saturation.

Data:

Baader Blue 36 mm: 16x300"
Baader Green 36 mm: 16x300"
Baader Luminance 36 mm: 61x300"
Baader Red 36 mm: 16x300"
Chroma Ha 3nm: 6x1200"

All unbinned for a total integration time of 11 hours and 5 minutes.

Thanks to @ollypenrice and to @Patrick Gilliland for some early tips on the processing of some issues with this.

HaLRGB_PBx1920px.jpg

Edited by gnomus
  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

love it, can you tell us how you went about processing this, i`m struggling big time with the light pollution and gradients the poor seeing gives me which also tends to ruin the colours somewhat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very, very nice natural and unforced Andromeda. The speckling of Ha is just right for me. I might take a point off the black end (which I very rarely say) but a lighter sky is also good. This wpuld print well.

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any reason what you swapped out your Atik 383 for the Moravian... ..?

i thought you were very happy with the Atik...? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your encouraging words.

2 hours ago, red dwalf said:

love it, can you tell us how you went about processing this, i`m struggling big time with the light pollution and gradients the poor seeing gives me which also tends to ruin the colours somewhat.

I don't know if I am expert enough to comment, but I can tell you what I do.  Firstly, I have stopped attempting to image when the conditions are not conducive.  I used to pay little heed to the Moon, for example, believing that if I pointed my scope at something on the other side of the sky I would get away with it.  I didn't.  Processing was a nightmare and the results were poor.  Secondly, I tried to be rigorous as to the level of LP I would 'accept'.  I am semi-rural and am pretty fortunate sky-wise.  However there are a couple of areas where LP starts to come into play in a significant way.  So I will stop capturing data when the scope gets round to those areas (I use SGP's plate solving feature, so I can always quickly start on a second target in a 'good' part of the sky if the mood takes me - or I could just go to bed early!)  Most of the M31 LRGB was shot when M31 was high in the sky.  I don't use a LP filter in my imaging train, but I am aware that some folks do do this (that is, they have the light coming through scope, then their LP filter, and finally through their 'imaging' filter.  That might help if you have a significant problem.  

Even with these measures I still require DBE: the RGB I DBEd twice (though I am not sure it needed the second round). 

1 hour ago, SkyBound said:

Any reason what you swapped out your Atik 383 for the Moravian... ..?

i thought you were very happy with the Atik...? :)

OK - you have induced some PTSD.  I haven't ditched the Atik, I still have it.  In the spring it looked like I might be able to source a second WO Star 71.  I thought I could put together a dual WO Star 71 rig (a sort of poor man's version of Olly's dual Tak set up which I had, at the time, just recently played with).  A dual rig means a second camera, of course, hence the Moravian.  (I was going to use the integrated OAG on the Moravian to guide).  However, these plans came to naught when the second WO Star 71 that was delivered turned out to be no good.  I haven't yet decided what to do with the perfectly good Atik 383 that I have.  I will probably sell it in the new year.

2 hours ago, ollypenrice said:

Very, very nice natural and unforced Andromeda. The speckling of Ha is just right for me. I might take a point off the black end (which I very rarely say) but a lighter sky is also good. This wpuld print well.

Olly

Thank you for commenting Olly.  I have had a go at taking 2 points off the black and it does look a little better.  The difference is subtle though, and I don't think it merits a repost.  My dream is that one day I will manage to post an image thread that doesn't have 4, 5 or even 6 different re-works. :icon_geek: 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, gnomus said:

My dream is that one day I will manage to post an image thread that doesn't have 4, 5 or even 6 different re-works. :icon_geek: 

That's also one of mine :icon_biggrin:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, gnomus said:

 My dream is that one day I will manage to post an image thread that doesn't have 4, 5 or even 6 different re-works. :icon_geek: 

I used to have the same dream but now I realise that it will never happen...

(I just leave a year or two between reworks on the grounds that I've added another night's worth of data. Don't tell anybody.)

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skillfully done Steve, very natural with understated colours.  You know it's good when it doesn't look processed :icon_biggrin:.

Reprocessing old data is a satisfying method to confirm progress in applying all those techniques.  However, I'm sure we would prefer endless clear skies to gather new data . . .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like it Steve natural look, nice Ha showing through, detail in M110 everything you could ask for.  Always more refinements that could be made but nothing here to worry about.

Paddy 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, gnomus said:

I don't know if I am expert enough to comment, but I can tell you what I do.  Firstly, I have stopped attempting to image when the conditions are not conducive.  I used to pay little heed to the Moon, for example, believing that if I pointed my scope at something on the other side of the sky I would get away with it.  I didn't.  Processing was a nightmare and the results were poor.  Secondly, I tried to be rigorous as to the level of LP I would 'accept'.  I am semi-rural and am pretty fortunate sky-wise.  However there are a couple of areas where LP starts to come into play in a significant way.  So I will stop capturing data when the scope gets round to those areas (I use SGP's plate solving feature, so I can always quickly start on a second target in a 'good' part of the sky if the mood takes me - or I could just go to bed early!)  Most of the M31 LRGB was shot when M31 was high in the sky.  I don't use a LP filter in my imaging train, but I am aware that some folks do do this (that is, they have the light coming through scope, then their LP filter, and finally through their 'imaging' filter.  That might help if you have a significant problem.

That all sounds like really good advice to go along with a wonderful image. What a difference 2 years makes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, gnomus said:

..... My dream is that one day I will manage to post an image thread that doesn't have 4, 5 or even 6 different re-works. :icon_geek: 

But not this time.  I have taken the black point in as per Olly's suggestion.  I did another run of LCE for the dust lanes only.  I did some minor work on star haloes:

HaLRGB_PFx1920.jpg

Edited by gnomus
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Camalajs525
      Since I am very new to this, I struggle a lot. Especially when observing planets and also recently deep sky objects. My telescope is an amateur telescope and its almost 11 years old (The telescope was re used a year ago). During summer of last year I took photos of Saturn,Jupiter and a month ago took photos of Venus and Mars. About 2 days ago I stumbled upon a new thing in the sky, (Unfortunately, I didn't take a picture). It definitely was in the Orion constellation  as I had observed Betelgeuse and the 3 stars that were close to each other. After a couple of minutes later I saw 2 stars next to each other and another two which were on top of the other star, surrounding these set of stars were a blue-ish and grey-ish colour at the same time. I had done some research and many people told me it was the trapezium cluster found in Orion. I honestly don't know. Any ideas? Thanks. 
    • By stevewanstall
      Celestron 9.25 at f6.3, SW EQ6R pro, Canon 550 D modded
      The galaxy group Hickson 44 in Leo. This is based on 29 x 240 s, plus bias and flats.

      Hickson 44 in Leo:

      There are some other galaxies near by, some of which are names in this overlay from Astrometry.net:

      Overlay from Astrometry, naming the other objects:

      The main ones are NGC 3190, NGC 3185, NGC 3187 and NGC 3193. NGC 3190 has a well defined dust lane. NGC 3187 is a barred spiral galaxy with two arms. NGC 3193 is an elliptical galaxy.
      The light captured by my camera last night left these galaxies just after the extinction event killed the dinosaurs on Earth.
      From APOD: Galaxies, like stars, frequently form groups. A group of galaxies is a system containing more than two galaxies but less than the tens or hundreds typically found in a cluster of galaxies. A most notable example is the Local Group of Galaxies, which houses over 30 galaxies including our Milky Way, Andromeda, and the Magellanic Clouds. Pictured above is nearby compact group Hickson 44. This group is located about 60 million light-years away toward the constellation of Leo. Also known as the NGC 3190 Group, Hickson 44 contains several bright spiral galaxies and one bright elliptical galaxy on the upper right. The bright source on the upper left is a foreground star. Many galaxies in Hickson 44 and other compact groups are either slowly merging or gravitationally pulling each other apart.
       
       
      Abell 1367
      This image is based on 19 x 300 s , plus flats and bias. It shows a LOT of galaxies, in a grouping called Abell 1367. In this image you are looking at part of one of the biggest structures in the Universe, the Great Wall.

      Wikipedia:
      The Leo Cluster (Abell 1367) is a galaxy cluster about 330 million light-years distant (z = 0.022) in the constellation Leo, with at least 70 major galaxies. The galaxy known as NGC 3842 is the brightest member of this cluster. Along with the Coma Cluster, it is one of the two major clusters comprising the Coma Supercluster, which in turn is part of the CfA2 Great Wall, which is hundreds of millions light years long and is one of the largest known structures in the universe.
      The overlay from Astrometry gives some of the galaxies visible in the image.

    • By Lancebloke
      So, although I had some issues with my auto guiding (which I found out afterwards) I did manage to get 9x180s exposures and 5 darks of Andromeda and give both stacking (using DSS) and processing (using GIMP).
      My first attempted DSO....
       
      I am pretty sure that people could get far more information out of the TIFF file from the stack.
      Hopefully I will get another clear night soon. I am in a heavily light polluted area so I do have a clip in filter on my DSLR which I think took a lot away.
      More practise needed!
      Lance
    • By beka
      Hi All,
      Having had to move to an apartment where I could not use my CPC 1100, I decided that I have to see what I could do with my NexStar SLT 102 (alt-az achromatic 102mm f6.47 refractor). Setting up on my narrow balcony was challenging and the altitude bearing was so loose that it almost moved from the weight of the Canon 700D. I could not see M31 in the estimated 3.5 magnitude sky so I did a two star alignment and used the live-view to focus on a bright star. I then took a 15 second exposure after slewing to M31 which allowed me to see that I had it in the field of view. After a few more 15 second exposures and playing with the motion controls I managed to get it centered. The resulting picture is from 39 subs of 30 seconds at ISO 1600, 9 flats. The images were stacked and stretched with Siril and then I played with the curves on Gimp, cropped and scaled. Not too unhappy.
       

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.