Jump to content

M33


CCD Imager

Recommended Posts

Not overdone at all, the hot blue stars are there but not overpowering and the HII regions are showing up nicely.

Not truly "unguided" as the 10-micron mounts guide on their encoders, as do ASA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These encoder mounts rely on an accurate sky model so the mount can correct between where it should be and where it actually is. This will vary depending on where it is pointing, hence the large number of points. ASA mounts go further and make a new local model for each imaging run in addition to the overall model. I regulaly see my ASA DDM60 get errors down to 0.1 - 0.2 arcsec. The high resolution encoders (0.03" for my DDM60) mean that wind gusts can be corrected almost instantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it's a very nice result. We talked quite a lot (in a banterish kind of way!!) about processing and CCD Imager's result is true to the processing principles he believes in and which I admire. Nice high black point, no intrusive sharpening or noise reduction, the colour allowed to speak for itself. This is gently done and leaves you feeling that the data maybe has a tiny bit more to give. This is so much better than the feeling that it has had its neck wrung! This looks like M33, not Las Vegas. :icon_salut:

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave

No need to teach me about absolute encoders, I am full convert, couldn't live without them now!

The ASA and Astrophysics mounts have Renishaw encoders that are of higher resolution than 10 micron, but as you see from my image, tracking is perfect. I believe there are bigger errors elsewhere than contribute to tracking issues, (sloppy optics, focusers etc). I performed a 60 point model that included compensation for temperature, humidity and atmospheric pressure. Not sure I would want to do a new model for each image, wastes valuable imaging time :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, not really trying to teach you about encoders. The MLPT that ASA mounts do only takes about 5-6 min,  all it does is track through your imaging path taking photos (As many as you specify) and solve them on the fly. It then knows the specific corrections to make. I regularly see it get 1.5 ' over 2 hours down to 0.1".

You might gather I'm a bit in love with my DDM 60 :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.