Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_beauty_night_skies.thumb.jpg.2711ade15e31d01524e7dc52d15c4217.jpg

GTom

Good Barlow for Ethos, Delos in APO and SCT scopes?

Recommended Posts

I am looking for a really good Barlow, that doesn't compromise the performance even of the greatest EP's. Speaking of good EP, I already have a 3.5mm Delos - "Barlowing it" puts any scope on its edge anyway.

I intend to use it on my 90/600 APO and possibly a c11 in the not-so-far future.

Any recommendations, which one to take?

Right now, I am looking at the Powermate 2x. I see, it's a corrected optics, but is it also APOchromatic?

Other, quite exotic piece I found and seems interesting, is the Baader Fluorit Flatfield Converter. Latter seems interesting for planetary photography too.

Edited by GTom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd suggest that you start using the EPs you have to begin with.

3.5mm Delos will be too high magnification for a f10/f11 SCT 99% of time, you can at most checking SCT collimation or very few doubles under great seeings with it; and for your 90/600 APO, it is quite close to the max magnification you can get under good seeings without much floaters in your eye become distracting.

If 3.5mm Delos delivers very often good steady planetary views in your APO, then you might consider a barlow or powermate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's unlikely you can find better than the Powermates. You may find something as good, but I would doubt that it would be better.

And if you're pairing the Powermate with TeleVue eyepieces you have a harmonious match. ?

Edit: But as YKSE points out Barlowing a 3.5mm EP will be over the top. ?

Edited by Floater

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used Powermates with my Ethos eyepieces. They produce the equivilent of the shorter length but don't add any other side effects apart from their weight.

I've also used an Antares 1.6x 2" barlow and a Meade 2" 2x Telextender in the same role. The results were good but the Powermate is the best solution that I have used.

There are a couple of other top end focal extender options including the Astro Physics Barcon and something from Zeiss (I think) but these are hard to find and I've not used them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, the powermate is the way to go. Not the cheapest power enhancer on the market but IMO probably the best. The powermate are designed to add nothing to the view but magnification. So the powermate  would be my recommendation 

In regards your question. I get the feeling that you are magnification hungry. To powermate a 3.5 delos IMO is over the top. This means you will have a eyepiece equivalent to a 1.75 delos?. That's way to much for most situations and atmospheric conditions. If you go to high a magnification all you will end up with is an enlarged image ,but a very poor quality image probably very blurry, with little detail. You are better off keeping to a sensible magnification and even though the image may be smaller in the eyepiece,you will get a lot more detail of your subject and see a lot more overall 

Do not make the mistake of thinking magnification will show you more , it can show you a lot less ,with less detail. Keep to a sensible magnification and you will get a crisper sharper view. The best magnification is the one that shows you the most detail and not the highest one you can achieve.   

I hope this helps☺

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for everybody! The reason I asked was the ~20% Tele Vue deal (ends today) at two german stores, I ordered the 2x powermate then alongside a 10mm Ethos. This way even if 1.75mm is useless, I have 3.5mm (171x), 10mm (60x) and powermated 5mm (120x). Adding the powermate was way cheaper than adding even a delos...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Varavall
      NOW SOLD!
       
      I only have room in my life for one lovely refractor, so one must go. I have acquired a Takahashi, so my beloved and well cared for William Optics Zenithstar SD66 has to go. It is optically perfect with no scuffs or scrapes. Has been used as a guide scope and astrograph on my LX90. It comes in its aluminum flight case. OTA only.
      Price is £280 or 325 euros, to include postage within the EU.
      PM me if interested.







    • By Greg6498
      After receiving great advice from this group, I decided to purchase this TeleVue 2x Barlow! It's going on my Skywatcher Evostar Pro 80mm. I have an ES 6.7 eyepiece I want to use with it. Can’t wait to give it a go!

    • By hennyvenom
      Hello everyone, I've got a question.
      I want to upgrade the visual back on the Mak 127. The standard back on the Mak is not pleasant to work with as seen in the image. I need to get rid of this plastic thing. I purchased a mak to sct adapter when I bought the scope, I never got around to doing anything until now as I've just acquired a Baader 2.25x barlow as shown in the image.
      Now, I've had a go of attaching the the Baader Barlow into the original plastic thing on the mak, it works .... but I'm not happy with the connection being made with the two locking screws, as there is still movement when the barlow, t-ring and Canon DSLR are all in the train.
      I've been having a look on FLO for some work around, does anyone have some input as to whether this will work.
      Mak to sct adapter-> Baader 2 inch to 1.25 reducer adapter->Baader 2.25x barlow + T ring & DSLR
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/baader-2-to-125-reducer-adapter.html
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/BaaderT2ext-1508153.html
      Any input or a better way of securing everything is greatly appreciated!😊




      Another option I've come across is this , Baader ClickLock 2"-1.25" Adapter  and Baader T2 Extension Tube to bring it to 40mm when attached to the mak to sct adapter. Anyone have any experience with this? 
    • By MakeItSo
      Hello All, 
      I have a quick question. I am thinking (very loosely) about the possibility of a small APO for wide field views to piggyback on my CPC 1100. I am interested in recommendations. At the moment I am not planning on AP. 
      I can see that there is a huge range in prices and to be honest I am looking for something thats reasonably decent quality (circa £500 - having no experience with APOs I really don't have a sense as to whether thats quite enough or not really enough). I had looked at the Orion Carbon Fibre 80mm f/6 APO Triplet but its just a bit too much money. 
      Please advise...
      And many thanks. 
    • By Cosmic Geoff
      I had another go at imaging the shrinking Mars, this time without and with a x2 Barlow lens.  The results are better with the Barlow, which is what one is led to expect.   For whatever reason (probably bad seeing and/or low planets) when I tried a Barlow previously it just made the blur bigger.  Equipment: C8 SE, ASI120MC, x2 Skywatcher kit Barlow element screwed directly into 1.25" barrel of the ZWO camera.   This does seem to give x2 in practice.  I did not use an ADC on the grounds that I shouldn't need one with Mars at an altitude of over 40 degrees.
      3000 image video captured with Sharpcap. Processed in Registax6.  I found that the Sharpcap exposure histogram did not appear to work on such a small image, so had to estimate the exposure.   Yes, optical ADC correction would be better, but the dispersion seemed very small.  Blowing up the image x2 in Registax showed a small colour fringe, which I took out with a single point of correction.
      The images show some surface detail though the contrast is low (if you are using a flatscreen try viewing from below: ?)  Mare Sirenum, with Mare Acidalium just discernible foreshortened at upper right. 


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.