StargeezerTim Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 I learnt a lot about how not to image this last night, but it still makes an impressive skyscape! 18 X 5 min, iso 1600, F 2.8 (5.6 next time!), 50mm lens, 1200D, DSS, PS, DBE. I had to crop off loads because of coma, but look forward to another go at this soon. 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexbb Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 Nice one! You'll need 4 times more data at F/5.6 to receive the same amount of light. I'll think about this one too at some point 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of Clear Skies Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 (edited) I've made the same mistake of being too greedy with the aperture before. However, I don't think there is any need to go all the way to f5.6 on a 50mm lens, f4.5 should be fine and f4 may be OK. As moise212 says, you're getting much less data at f5.6. Edited November 7, 2016 by Knight of Clear Skies 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wimvb Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 Great image. I agree, f/4 should be enough to get the stars under control. But also consider increasing the number of subs. The less noise, the easier it will be to bring out the weak nebluae. And since you seem to be using PI (for DBE at least), consider starting with a masked stretch and a HDRMultiscaleTransform, to get at both the weak and strong nebulae. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Presland Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 A fine start! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now