Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_2.thumb.jpg.72789c04780d7659f5b63ea05534a956.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

I’m putting a shopping list together for an astrophotography setup and I could really do with a bit of advice on my options thus far.

My aim is to photograph DSO’s  (I’m really keen on imaging galaxies) I need a rig that is easy to set up and also portable as I plan to transport it to the darkest skies I have available to me.

I’ve been shooting wide field astrophotography with a DSLR and a tripod for about 5 years now so I already own a modified Sony A7S and an unmodified Canon 5D Mk3, so I will start by shooting with these bodies.
 
I'm still undecided on scope and mount, hence the list has options.

My list so far:

Telescope:
Orion ED80
WIlliam Optics GT81
Explore Scientific 80 Essentials

Mount:
EQ6
HEQ5

Finder Scope and CCD for Guiding:
Orion Mini 50mm Guidescope
Meade DSI Colour

I intend on using PHD for guiding. I also need other accessories such as field flatteners etc, so any advice on 'the extras' would also be greatly appreciated.

I don't expect to get hubble-esque images from this rig! I would like to go down the refractor route, but other than M31 which is, of course, rather large, are these telescopes going to be any good for galaxies? It is one of the reasons I am leaning towards the Orion ED80 as the scope for that extra 120mm of focal length as all the scopes listed are f/6.

I'm also leaning towards the EQ6 for the mount but any other suggestions are more than welcome.
 
Thanks is advance!
Edited by Astro Buer
Link to post
Share on other sites

The only scope I would add to that list might be the Skywatcher Esprit 80 plus flattener.  I really like my Esprit 120 and have considered an Esprit 80 for wide-field.  I have read about a number f folks who seem happy with theirs.  However, it comes with a foot, not rings, so if you were planning to get a dedicated guidescope at some point (like the ST80) I am not sure how you would connect one to the other.   It should work fine with the finder-guider you are thinking about using though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go find a club that has an imaging section: http://www.astronomyclubs.co.uk/

To me the equipment listed does not seem to match the requirements of transportable and easy to set up.

Have you seen, preferably lifted an EQ6? I have an HEQ5, I also have an EQ5. The reason I have the EQ5 is simply the weight and size of the HEQ5, no way was I going to think of hauling the HEQ5 around. Even into and out of the car was enough to put me off it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gnomus, thanks for pointing me towards the Sky Watcher Esprit, I’ll look into that for sure.

Ronin, I have looked at astro clubs in my area as I know there will be people there will be able to give me a good steer. It’s something I plan to pursue in the near future, so thanks for the link.

Regarding the weight of the HEQ5, I know it is a little heavy (Tripod 5.6kg, Mount 10kg plus weights 5kg each) and the EQ6 being heavier weighing in at 23.5Kgs without weights… But I am quite used to hiking with a 15kg bag on my back (I know the differentiation of the weight is different!) plus when I travel I usually take two 23kg bags with me, and I get those two and from the car without issue so the weight of the mount does not bother me too much.

Everyone keeps saying that the mount is 70% responsible for your success, so I want to make sure I get this right, so if that means a little more muscle power to get it to and from a dark site, then I’m ok with that.

Thanks so much for your comments so far :icon_biggrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is galaxies that interest you, then most of those refractors have too short a focal length to really do them justice I reckon, other than some notable larger ones. You need something with a little more reach, which will also up the challenge, but galaxies are basically not easy. To fit on an HEQ5, you could look at a 6" or 8" RC to add to your decision difficulties.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, MattJenko said:

If it is galaxies that interest you, then most of those refractors have too short a focal length to really do them justice I reckon, other than some notable larger ones. You need something with a little more reach, which will also up the challenge, but galaxies are basically not easy. To fit on an HEQ5, you could look at a 6" or 8" RC to add to your decision difficulties.

Thanks MattJenko. Are there any RC's within a reasonable price range that you would particularly recommend? 

Also I see you are based in North Essex and have some wonderful images on your website. Could I trouble you to ask where you usually image from?

Edited by Astro Buer
Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a few manufacturers of the RC6, with different brandings, which are in the £400 category. They are compact, and whilst certainly not as straightforward to use as refractors, they might offer an alternative to your original list.

I usually image from my back garden, which is up near the Suffolk border, in a street-light-less village, so I am lucky in that regard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The the exception of M33 & M31, galaxies are pretty small objects in the night sky. You're going to need some more focal length to do them any justice than an ED80 will give you, my primary interest is also galaxies and I image with a 6"RC from Altair Astro reduced down a little to just over 900mm focal length, which I find gives me a wide range of targets to image, but there are a huge amount more that even at 900mm I'm a little short on.

The 6"RC isn't what I would class as a beginners scope, and you may find it a little frustrating to begin with, but if galaxy imaging is what you are after there is no substitute for focal length.

Have a look at my web page in sig or my flickr stream to see what can be achieved witht e 6"RC and a mono Atik CCD camera.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/skywatcher150/

Edited by johnrt
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MattJenko said:

There are a few manufacturers of the RC6, with different brandings, which are in the £400 category. They are compact, and whilst certainly not as straightforward to use as refractors, they might offer an alternative to your original list.

I usually image from my back garden, which is up near the Suffolk border, in a street-light-less village, so I am lucky in that regard.

Thanks MattJenko

59 minutes ago, johnrt said:

The the exception of M33 & M31, galaxies are pretty small objects in the night sky. You're going to need some more focal length to do them any justice than an ED80 will give you, my primary interest is also galaxies and I image with a 6"RC from Altair Astro reduced down a little to just over 900mm focal length, which I find gives me a wide range of targets to image, but there are a huge amount more that even at 900mm I'm a little short on.

The 6"RC isn't what I would class as a beginners scope, and you may find it a little frustrating to begin with, but if galaxy imaging is what you are after there is no substitute for focal length.

Have a look at my web page in sig or my flickr stream to see what can be achieved witht e 6"RC and a mono Atik CCD camera.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/skywatcher150/

Thanks Johnrt, some wonderful images on your site also! I've found the Orion RC6 which has a focal length of 1370mm but I have to say the 6"RC Altair Astro does look good.

Thanks for all your help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Astro Buer said:

Thanks MattJenko

Thanks Johnrt, some wonderful images on your site also! I've found the Orion RC6 which has a focal length of 1370mm but I have to say the 6"RC Altair Astro does look good.

Thanks for all your help :)

The Orion & Altair 6'RC are essentially the same scope, but may come with different accessories. The 6" RC at native focal length is f/9 which from experience I can tell you is too slow for DSO imaging here in the UK, you will need to think about also adding a reducer to speed it up a little and make it manageable. The Astro Physics CCDT67 works well with this scope.

Edited by johnrt
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 31 October 2016 at 11:26, johnrt said:

The Orion & Altair 6'RC are essentially the same scope, but may come with different accessories. The 6" RC at native focal length is f/9 which from experience I can tell you is too slow for DSO imaging here in the UK, you will need to think about also adding a reducer to speed it up a little and make it manageable. The Astro Physics CCDT67 works well with this scope.

Thanks johnrt. 

If I was to stick along the refractor route what about the Explore Scientific ED APO 127mm f/7.5 Carbon Fibre v2.0 Triplet Refractor OTA?

Weighing in at 6.8kg and with a focal length of 952mm at f7.5, it would still sit within the HEQ5's payload for imaging. I know there will be other weight added and you should over egg the mount where possible... to be safe maybe I should just go for the EQ6 and get down the gym! 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Astro Buer said:

Thanks johnrt. 

If I was to stick along the refractor route what about the Explore Scientific ED APO 127mm f/7.5 Carbon Fibre v2.0 Triplet Refractor OTA?

Weighing in at 6.8kg and with a focal length of 952mm at f7.5, it would still sit within the HEQ5's payload for imaging. I know there will be other weight added and you should over egg the mount where possible... to be safe maybe I should just go for the EQ6 and get down the gym! 

 

Once you have added accessories for guiding and cameras etc you are going to be really pushing the upper limit of an HEQ5, personally I would be looking at an EQ6 for that kind of weight. Your mount is the key to a successful imaging rig, you can have the best scope, cameras and filters in the world, but on a struggling mount they are useless. Don't skimp on the mount.

As for the 127mm triplet, I'm not aware of any images taken with it. The hallmark of a quality refractor is how it handles the blue end of the spectrum, an example with poor colour correction will bloat the blue and give you nasty rings on stars, I'm not aware of any images taken with this OTA, and I'd personally want to see plenty before I splashed £1500 on it.

Of course with an RC reflector at 1/5th the retail price you don't need to worry about poor colour correction ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, johnrt said:

Of course with an RC reflector at 1/5th the retail price you don't need to worry about poor colour correction

:) ... I hope this doesn't sound like a stupid question, but when using the Astro Physics CCDT67, does this also act as a field flattener? I know the RC's handle coma well, hence they are such a good choice for photography, but I've been searching the web for a while now and cannot find an answer. Basically, will I need a field flattener as well?

So updated list would be:

Altair Astro 6"RC

HEQ5 with Synscan

Astro Physics CCDT67

Orion Mini 50mm Guidescope

Meade DSI Colour
 
I would probably image with my Canon 5D3 as I could run Backyard EOS, but this will add to the weight over the Sony A7S (which is modded...) But I have read that the Sony adds a noise reducing algorithm on bulb exposures that is a bit like the old Star Eater Algorithm of Nikon in days gone by, so not great for galaxies I'm assuming as I would be looking to take subs of over 30secs...
 
Would you still recommend the EQ6 with the above setup?
 
Sorry for my naivety! I'm sure you can empathise in some way from when you first started out...  
 
 
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Astro Buer said:

:) ... I hope this doesn't sound like a stupid question, but when using the Astro Physics CCDT67, does this also act as a field flattener? I know the RC's handle coma well, hence they are such a good choice for photography, but I've been searching the web for a while now and cannot find an answer. Basically, will I need a field flattener as well?

So updated list would be:

Altair Astro 6"RC

HEQ5 with Synscan

Astro Physics CCDT67

Orion Mini 50mm Guidescope

Meade DSI Colour
 
I would probably image with my Canon 5D3 as I could run Backyard EOS, but this will add to the weight over the Sony A7S (which is modded...) But I have read that the Sony adds a noise reducing algorithm on bulb exposures that is a bit like the old Star Eater Algorithm of Nikon in days gone by, so not great for galaxies I'm assuming as I would be looking to take subs of over 30secs...
 
Would you still recommend the EQ6 with the above setup?
 
Sorry for my naivety! I'm sure you can empathise in some way from when you first started out...  
 
 

Yes the telecompressor gives a great flat for imaging with this scope. Be warned though I would not class the 6"RC as a beginners scope if you do decide to go down that route.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an 8" RC and like it very much but my 80mm refractor is my scope of choice except during February and March.

I wouldn't recommend an RC for a first foray into guiding, don't underestimate the difficulties and frustrations that can arise. There's a whole host of fabulous targets for your camera combined with a fast 80mm refractor..... come back to the small stuff later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By chrobakx
      This is Celestron cg3 mount suitable for any telescope tube with vixen dovetail.
      Load capacity is approximately up to 4 kg
      Condition is used, but in very good shape. 
      It's comcompletely with 3d printed levelling plate, under tray for accessories, slow motion and locking knobs.
      Mount was completely stripped down, removed factory sticky grease and applied proper grease where applicable.
      Price: £90
      I can post it by Hermes or DPD if you are happy to pay for postage.
      I'll accept PayPal as family/friends or commercial if you'll pay the 3% fee.






    • By AlvinP
      Hello,
      I've been on these forums a couple of times for the last 2 weeks and ive found amazing advice, on telescopes, mounts and eyepiece. Besides reading countless of information on the internet about various equipments; pros and cons; and i got some queries about how to upgrade my setup.
      My original purchase was a 15x70 Celestron Binoculars last year, and boy ive seen amazing things with it, specially globular clusters, Jupiter and Saturn and the Orion's Nebula; for me these were amazing; i still use them given how easy it is to look at the sky with them and how bright and full everything looks.  A couple of months ago i got a 70x400mm Gskyer Telescope with an AZ mount (The cheap 99$ one that Amazon is displaying on all its adds for the last two months)  it came with a 25mm and a 10mm eyepieces as well as a x3 barlows (which i didnt even count as part of my scope as it is too bad quality and i havent managed a single decent view with it).

      Currently My Celestron Binoculars (x15) seem better for visualizing the sky than the 25mm eyepiece (x16) (things seem a very bit dimmer). And since the Barlow is a "no go", the 10mm (x40) eyepiece is what i really use, it has decent zoom and detailed views , it is my go to eyepiece most of the nights.
      However from reading all around, ive read that most of the stuff that come with the Telescope (aside from the scope itself) are actually really bad quality, specially no name brands without even webpage, so if i were to maximise my telescope i should update some of those items.
      -Recently i ordered a new Start diagonal to replace to default one (ive heard on Refractors its usually the weakest link next to eyepieces) as well as an economic x2 Barlow lens
      Keep in mind i recognize my 70mm cheap telescope will not suddendly become the Hubble Telescope, and that it doesnt matter how hard i push it, in the end such a low scope will be bound to hit its limit pretty fast, thats why i avoid 70$+ eyepieces and barlows for now.
      I expect to keep using this telescope for a good couple of months; at least until around August, when Jupiter and Saturn are more in the night sky, rather than morning.

      Now, im very satisfied with my current telescope; while the phone mount is garbage and the phone weight and the sound of my heartbeats pretty much shake the telescope out of position, as well as how cheap the mount is; it still gets the job done for seeing interesting stuff in the sky and i have managed to do some AP for some of the globular clusters, bunch of 1-2s images (with the wrong lens), not the best, not even good pictures; but decent overall for my equipment. I am currently interested in stargazing in general and some minor AP (as i dont have a camera, currently an Iphone 7s with the mount) Buuut im interested in borrowing a camera for the low sky photos without a telescope.
      I do most 97% of my Skywatching on my backyard, i live in a small country, there is some light pollution, but i can see the pleiades and the orion's nebula core on the naked eye most nights (so i guess its not that contaminated lol)
      Now; currently i like finding stuff by myself and show it to the other people around me who cant be bothered to find the moon in the sky, so setting up, finding and seeing stuff is part of what i like. 
      With all the above in mind..... Id like to plan ahead for my next purchases.
      First, im thinking a x3 barlow lens (to replace the original crappy one) and a 15mm lens (to have a bit better view than the 10mm, but less spread than the 25mm) in two or three months (with this id be able to check if my new eyepiece outperforms my default ones, but given the quality of the scope, i dont expect this to be noticeable).
      And Afterwards id love to get a new Scope, but im not quite sure what i want... and i would like some advice and help in choosing my next Scope upgrade.
      -I entered with and im liking the refractors; however i dont wanna spend 300-400$ on another refractor that is 20-30% better for triple the price
      -Ive heard really long focal lenght might bring some distortions; and also make the scope much bulkier, annnd most importantly i know that magnification is not everything; so a 1000mm long tube would prob bring too much magnifications for me to use properly on my backyard skies. So i think id settle for a maximum of 600-700mm.
      -Originally i was againts Newtonians in general, those inverted views scared me, i have a hard time of my own with my finderscope. Then i found out that Reflectors are the name of efficiency as they have more value per aperture than refractors; and as someone once mentioned "There is not really up and down in space, you will get used to it" annnd its true... save for references on the ground, like buildings, trees and mountains to help you locate where you are in the sky; once you are on it, you dont need right ups and downs.
      -I did see some 90mm Orion's Refractors as well as 90-102 Celestron Astromaster Refractors (these are 350-400$)
      -Im thinking a 130mm reflector is what im looking for; i think the 130mm aperture is a nice upgrade for my 70mm, and will keep me occupied for quite a long time; ive read about Orion SpaceProbe 130EQ and Celestron Astromaster 130EQ (ive also read, Power Seekers and Astromaster's are made out of pretty much garbage lol) Ive read that the main issue is the constant collimation required for them; but ive also read its something that can be learned and once you get used to it; its a pretty easy thing to do to keep getting amazing views.
      -Ive also seen people recommending  6-8'' Dobsonians; i know the deal with them; if anything i could aim for a 6'' one i found a litter under 300$ ive read they are amazing values for their aperture
      So, TL;DR: I have a 70x400mm Telescope, im new to stargazing, im really amazed and excited by what im seeing with my current scope, but would like an stable upgrade before the end of the year that will last me a year or two. I am interesteted both in regular and deep sky stargazing and astrophotography;  im not currently interested in an motorized mount; could deal with a regular Equatorial mount. But overall i am looking for  more aperture (100-150mm) to have clearer views; than focal lenght for zoom.

      Im also open to the fact that at one point i might have to get a scope for stargazing and another for AP; but would like an upgrade that could help me all around for both while i get initiated.
      ------------------------------------------------------------------
      Sorrry for the Huuuuuuuuge post, i was very excited while writing it; please let me know what you think and if there's anything else you'd want me to add to help understand my situation, thanks in advance!
       
       
    • By chrobakx
      I looking for a polar scope for my eq3 or HEQ5 mount
    • By endless-sky
      After a 20 year long hiatus - my last astrophoto was captured with a film camera in 1997 - at the beginning of 2020 I decided it was time to start again.
      So, January 25th 2020 I brought home my used Sky-Watcher NEQ6 Pro and I immediately started taking photos. Obviously, my first target was M42 in Orion.
      This was my first digital astrophotography. 31 subframes, 30s each, taken at ISO800 with my unmodified Nikon D90, Nikkor 70-300mm at 300mm f/6.3 - January 28th, 2020, home front yard, Bortle 5/6 sky, no guiding, no filters. A grand total of 15.5 minutes...

      A couple of weeks later, me and my wife went to spend Valentine's weekend in the mountains. Of course I couldn't avoid taking advantage of the Bortle 4 sky and I took all my gear with me. Same target, 52 subframes, 45s each, taken at ISO800 with my unmodified Nikon D90, Nikkor 70-300mm at 300m f/5.6 - February 14th, 2020, Tonadico, Bortle 4 sky, no guiding, no filters. 39 minutes total integration.

      After I finished post-processing the second photograph, I was so happy with the result. It felt amazing that I was able to capture so many details and more nebulosity compared to the photo taken from home.
      Months passed, gear was changed. First one being the camera: at the end of February I bought a Nikon D5300 and a couple of months later I astromodified it on my own, adding a UV/IR cut filter in front of the sensor, after cutting it to size.
      In October the rest of the setup finally arrived: Tecnosky 80/480 APO FPL53 Triplet OWL Series imaging telescope, Artesky UltraGuide 60mm f/4 guide scope and ZWO ASI 224MC guide camera. Also, an Optolong L-Pro 2" light pollution filter.
      After months of imaging and getting more experienced with PixInsight, it was just a matter of waiting before I could have another go at one of my favorite targets. And maybe give it a little more justice.
      This project took me more than a month, due to the rare clear nights opportunities I have had here lately.
      I started acquiring in January and finished a couple of weeks ago.
      M42 taken over 8 nights, under my Bortle 5/6 sky.
      Total integration time: 18h 04m 00s for the nebula. 714s (14s subs) + 2065s (35s subs) for the Trapezium and the core.
      Here are the acquisition details:
      Mount: Sky-Watcher NEQ6 Pro
      Telescope: Tecnosky 80/480 APO FPL53 Triplet OWL Series
      Camera: D5300 astromodified
      Reducer/flattener: Tecnosky 4 elements, 0.8x
      Guide-scope: Artesky UltraGuide 60mm f/4
      Guide-camera: ZWO ASI 224MC
      2021/01/12: Number of subs/Exposure time: 33@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, no Moon
      2021/01/13: Number of subs/Exposure time: 33@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, no Moon
      2021/01/15: Number of subs/Exposure time: 38@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 8% illuminated
      2021/01/18: Number of subs/Exposure time: 36@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 30% illuminated
      2021/02/13: Number of subs/Exposure time: 30@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 4% illuminated
      2021/02/14: Number of subs/Exposure time: 23@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 9% illuminated
      2021/02/15: Number of subs/Exposure time: 51@14s + 48@35s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 15% illuminated
      2021/02/17: Number of subs/Exposure time: 11@35s + 38@180s + 1@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 30% illuminated
      Total exposure time (main integration): 65040s = 18h 04m 00s.
      Total exposure time (35s integration): 2065s.
      Total exposure time (14s integration): 714s.
      Pre and post-processing: PixInsight 1.8.8-7.
      Full HDR Version:

      Masked Stretch Version:

      Blended Version (50% HDR + 50% Masked Stretch):

      To my personal taste, I like the blended version the most. I think it brings out the best of both worlds (HDR and soft, less contrasty but more colorful look).
      I must say, I am very pleased and happy with the result. Not to boast, but I think I have come a long way since I started.
      Obviously the better gear and the much, much longer integration time helped.
      I think I actually spent more time post-processing it than acquiring it. Especially since I had to do the work almost twice: I post-processed the HDR and the Masked Stretch images separately, making sure I used the same processes and with the same strenght in both, so that I could combine them effectively, if I decided I didn’t like the look of the HDR alone. I also think I managed to tame the stars a lot more, compared to my previous post-processing attempts.
      As usual, here’s a link to the full resolution image(s): Orion Nebula (M42), De Mairan’s Nebula (M43) and Running Man (NGC 1977)
      Thanks for looking!
      C&C welcome!
       
    • By Yannick
      I recently got the eq3-2 synscan mount to start with astrophotography. I first wanted to get the eq5 goto mount, but it is way out of my budget, and I could not find any good used ones that would fit my budget. Furthermore, I hear a lot of people talking about how eq3-2 is not that good for astrophotography, but what are some things I can do to improve the mount. Cheers guys.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.