Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Different fundamental constants


Recommended Posts

"In a paper soon to be published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, astrophysicist Fred Adams says that the three most relevant physical constants that determine star formation can have very different values, yet still permit stars to appear. In other words, there is nothing obviously 'special' about their values in our Universe at all."

Read more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

scientists hate to think that the human race are somehow lucky. We like to think think we are very ordinary. The paper then says that we are inded not special, as a lot of different combinations of fundamental constants can produce stars which are the entities that support life

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it came as a bit of a shock when i read it.

The general anthropic principle and aspects of spacetime/ cosmological constant etc, imply that the universe is fine tuned.

The premise of the fine-tuned universe assertion is that a small change in several of the approximately 26 dimensionless fundamental physical constants would make the universe radically different

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it came as a bit of a shock when i read it.

The general anthropic principle and aspects of spacetime/ cosmological constant etc, imply that the universe is fine tuned.

Sadly, a lot of people don't like string theory for that very reason. The Anthropic Principle is a very good way of sidestepping some pretty big questions. "Why are we here? Well, we're here to ask, so what does it matter?"

Admittedly, it makes a very good point in the ight context.

The Copernican Principle on the other hand, implies that we are sitting on an average planet around an average star in an average part of an average galaxy. When you look at the astronomical evidence, that assertion holds up pretty well.

Besides, Fred Adams was talking about star formation... And his conclusion makes sense. If star formation required too specific a set of parameters, we'd probably see far less stars in the universe. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.