Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

How to check Binocular variable star measurements


Recommended Posts

I'm on holiday with 10x50 bins on a tripod, so thought I'd try my hand at taking some variable star measurements. I had some trouble with the estimates which I think I was due to being thrown by averted vision. I've tried checking them on the BAA VSS and AAVSO websites. (http://www.britastro.org/vssdb/data.php and https://www.aavso.org/lcg)

B50x10 Tripod - Bolsena, Italy
==============================
26/09/2016 20:58 UTC V465 Cas BAA Chart 233.01 C1V2A 6.4  .. looks bad as AAVSO has 6.5,6.6,6.7 for that day.
27/09/2016 20:21 UTC GO Peg BAA Chart 103.01 C1V1D 7.5 .. looks bad as AAVSO has 7.3 for that day. 
29/09/2016 19:55 UTC RZ Cas BAA Chart 236.01 A1V3B 6.2 .. Woo-Hoo, looks right, as not in eclipse!
29/09/2016 20:47 UTC IQ Per BAA Chart 246.01 D1V2E 7.4 .. looks bad as should be in the range 7.7 to 8.7

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to validate my estimates or why them may be wrong? Should I try photographing them at the same time with a DSLR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

If these are your first estimates, I don't think you've done badly at all!

Some of these are red stars and different observers have different responses to red, so there will be some scatter. This is taken into account when the combined data are analysed.

I do hope you will continue to observe variable stars. After a while they will become "your own" and you will be wondering what they're up to.

Have you considered joining the BAA Variable Star Section? Speaking as a member, your results would be appreciated.

All the best,

Jeremy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi @melsmore, I agree with @JeremyS that you are not that off at all. On the contrary, I would say you are doing very well. Keep estimating and reporting! Most of us humans are not very accurate and that there is a point on many observers participating on a program so observations can be averaged. This is because the average of a large number of different observations will smooth out all individual inaccuracies and bias.

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.