Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep33_banner.thumb.jpg.75d09b4b1b4e5bdb1393e57ce45e6a32.jpg

RohunA

Astrophotography with a Dobsonian Telescope

Recommended Posts

Hello!

This is my first post in a year since my initial post after joining this community. I look forward to posting and contributing more, as well as getting to know some other astronomy enthusiasts!

A little bit of background: I got into astronomy during December of 2012. Today, I am the owner of a pair of Celestron 15x70 binos, as well as an Orion xt8i Dobsonian. I own multiple eyepieces, including an 8-24mm zoom eyepiece, and a variety of filters, including a 13% transmission moon filter, an ultra block narrowband filter, and a set of color filters. The only major thing I consider to still be missing from my 'arsenal' is a way of taking astrophotographs, which leads me to the purpose of today's post.

I have been looking into astrophotography for some time now, and as I have a Dobsonian, the only practical type of astrophotography I can engage in (from my understanding) is Solar System Imaging. I am looking at different Solar System imagers which come with software allowing me to stack multiple frames. I emphasize that I do not have a tracking mount, or the budget/supplies to build one. I have been particularly looking at the Orion StarShoot Camera 4, the Orion StarShoot 5 MP Camera, and the Orion StarShoot USB Camera. I am wondering why the prices are so drastically different, seeing as they all appear to perform similar tasks. I'd love if someone could give me a rundown of the pros/cons of each of these cameras, or any other useful information regarding them. In addition, if there are any similar cameras that you have had a good experience with from other companies , I'd love to check them out as well!

Lastly, I'd like to know if there are any other methods with which I can take astrophotos. Keep in mind that they must be applicable to an instrument without tracking capabilities. Thank you guys for all the help! I hope to get more into the community over the next couple of months!

Clear Skies-

Rohun

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Untrue. Got a Revolution imager and got these. They were taken from.  The 7" monitor screen. You will need a goto dob, but deep sky photos are possible with a goto dob. But limited exposure due to field rotation. Some have taken deepsky stuff with tracking dobs as the revolution imager is a great setup to get going. These 2 are from my goto dob and first attempts

20160603_193101.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The above is m4. Below just the Centre of the milky way and was my first ever.

20160428_205419.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice! But like I said, my scope doesn't have tracking and I need an astrophotography solution and camera.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a laptop then you could have a go at imaging with any old webcam you might have knocking around. You will need to make a few modifications to the webcam but shouldn't cost you anything.

Then you could try imaging the Moon, Jupiter, Mars using SharpCap. Then registax to process the video and Gimp the final image. All free.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, happy-kat said:

If you have a laptop then you could have a go at imaging with any old webcam you might have knocking around. You will need to make a few modifications to the webcam but shouldn't cost you anything.

Then you could try imaging the Moon, Jupiter, Mars using SharpCap. Then registax to process the video and Gimp the final image. All free.

That's a great idea, but would I need a very good quality webcam? Because I have an old one but I'm not sure hat it can deliver good views. In addition, how do I modify it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You already have it so worth a go on the Moon.

You need to remove the lens and nip any leds that might light up.

Then make a 1.25 nose cone use an old 35mm film canister or a bit of plastic plumbing pipe and attach it to the webcam. This will hold the webcam in the focuser.

There are many posts on modding a webcam on here.

Link here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 21/07/2016 at 06:46, RohunA said:

I have been particularly looking at the Orion StarShoot Camera 4, the Orion StarShoot 5 MP Camera, and the Orion StarShoot USB Camera. I am wondering why the prices are so drastically different, seeing as they all appear to perform similar tasks. I'd love if someone could give me a rundown of the pros/cons of each of these cameras, or any other useful information regarding them. In addition, if there are any similar cameras that you have had a good experience with from other companies , I'd love to check them out as well!

 

The difference in prices is due to the specifications of the cameras. The cheapest Orion USB camera has a resolution of 0.3mp compared to the resolutions of the Starshoot IV (1.3mp) and the Orion Starshoot 5mp (5mp). Also take a look at the lunar/planetary imaging cameras from QHYCCD and ZW Optics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

You already have it so worth a go on the Moon.

You need to remove the lens and nip any leds that might light up.

Then make a 1.25 nose cone use an old 35mm film canister or a bit of plastic plumbing pipe and attach it to the webcam. This will hold the webcam in the focuser.

There are many posts on modding a webcam on here.

Link here

 

Thank you so much! I will try this out but my webcam seems pretty useless right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Cornelius Varley said:

The difference in prices is due to the specifications of the cameras. The cheapest Orion USB camera has a resolution of 0.3mp compared to the resolutions of the Starshoot IV (1.3mp) and the Orion Starshoot 5mp (5mp). Also take a look at the lunar/planetary imaging cameras from QHYCCD and ZW Optics

 

Do you think that the extra 3.7 mp in the StarShoot 5 is worth the extra $90? Will 1.3 mp be sufficient if I'm on a budget? Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By deanchapman2705
      Hi guys, hoping you can help with the tracking problems I'm coming across with my astrophotography setup. I've been using it since August 2020 and have kind of put up with the problem until last night where I think it's getting worse...
      Specs below (let me know if you need anything else):
      William Optics Zenithstar 61 II (360mm F6.1) - Zenithstar 61Adjustable Field Flattener iOptron SkyGuider Pro Camera Mount Full Package K&F Concept Aluminium Tripod with 2kg weight Canon EOS 250d (cropped sensor 1.6x) The problem:
      I take roughly 40 pics with each being 1 minute long at 1600 ISO and stack them on DeepSkyStacker. From a few people I know on the internet, it seems as though, with a very similar setup and same focal length, they can get around 3 mins of exposure with no problem. And that's without a guide camera.
      With my 1 minute exposure, roughly 10 of 40 images are reasonable but the rest have star trailing or double stars (see attached downscaled, unedited pics of Orion nebula)
      What I think it could be:
      My first idea was the tripod, it's not the best but it's not cheap plastic, and it should be fine for a 1 min exposure. Then I thought it could be the iOptron tracker that could be faulty?
      Every screw has been tightened, there's no play in any of the adapters/mounts.
       
      I thought I'd post this here to see if anyone else has the same problem or has more experience/knowledge that could help. Also to see if there's an obvious problem before I spend hundreds on a new tripod or send the tracker back for a replacement.
      Any help would be much appreciated!
      Thanks,
      Dean
       









    • By hooloovoo
      Hi, I'm just getting started with astrophotography and have been gathering the equipment. I've purchased the Star Watcher Evostar 72 APO Refractor Telescope and I've been researching all over the place for what flattener I should purchase. I'm wondering if there's a rule on how to pick one, does it have to be a certain size, brand, type, etc? Or does just any typical flattener work?... I see a wide range of prices and Its a little unclear to me what exactly I'm looking for since some flatteners look different than others. Im planning to connect this to a Nikon D7500 and I already have the M48 T mount but I don't know if thats relevant or only for certain flatteners as well. Basically any advice on how an amateur should set up and what all I need to get going. Thanks in advance for any help and recommendations. 
    • By stevebb
      Comet Neowise above Filey Country park
    • By stevebb
      Muston Imaging Group, nr Filey, North Yorks
    • By endless-sky
      I would like to share my second image.
      This is IC 1499, also known as the California Nebula, taken over 4 nights, under my Bortle 5 home sky.
      Total integration time: 10h 21m 00s.
      Here are the acquisition details:
      Mount: Sky-Watcher NEQ6 Pro
      Telescope: Tecnosky 80/480 APO FPL53 Triplet OWL Series
      Camera: D5300 astromodified
      Reducer/flattener: Tecnosky 4 elements, 0.8x
      Guide-scope: Artesky UltraGuide 60mm f/4
      Guide-camera: ZWO ASI 224MC
      2020/11/06: Number of subs/Exposure time: 23@180s + 41@240s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 67% illuminated
      2020/11/08: Number of subs/Exposure time: 40@240s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 46% illuminated.
      2020/11/09: Number of subs/Exposure time: 40@240s + 4@300s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 35% illuminated
      2020/11/12: Number of subs/Exposure time: 12@240s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 8% illuminated
      Total exposure time: 37260s = 10h 21m 00s.
      Pre and post-processing: PixInsight 1.8.8-6.

      Here's a link to the full resolution image: California Nebula (IC 1499)
      Thanks for looking!
      C&C welcome!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.