Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss.thumb.jpg.5b348d6a5e7f27bdcb79e9356b7fc03b.jpg

mbalkham

Time for an upgrade?

Recommended Posts

Not a new question I know (I've read a few topics on this as you can imagine) but I'd really appreciate the thoughts of others tailored to my situation!

I am shooting with a unmodded Canon 6D from my skywatcher 200p mounted to a NEQ6 and guiding with an Orion Awesome Autoguider. Almost entirely shooting deep space nebula targets from my yard in Wellington NZ and occasionally from a dark site about 40minutes drive away (my set-up is pretty mobile working from a Nextbook). I'm a pretty enthusiastic but only an occasional hobbyist maybe shooting a dozen times a year. My work is here on my flickr (https://www.flickr.com/photos/mattbalkham/) if you want/need to gauge my level of ability and assess if I am getting the most out of my current set-up.  

The main question I am asking myself is would I benefit from moving from the 6D (which I also use for normal photography inc. a few weddings etc. and therefore cannot modify) to;

1)  a modified DSLR (presumably a 'lesser' DSLR but maybe more tailored to Astro work); or

2) should I take the plunge into CCD (and if so colour/mono, etc. etc. etc.!)?

Depending on the answer to above, how much is it sensible to budget for this next step?

Thanks in advance

Matt

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Matt,

I currently have a modded 600D and there is a definite improvement for Ha rich Nebulae. However I'm looking to move into mono DSO imaging with a CCD/CMOS for greater sensitivity and less noise.

A mono setup can be expensive though depending on the camera you choose. There is also the filters and a filter wheel to consider. Although a wheel isn't an absolute necessity.

Not too sure if you'll get enough value from a mono setup if you're looking at occasional use.

I've not really looked at OSC CCD/CMOS so not sure about that option.

Andy.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy.

Now also wondering if a faster or larger ota might be the next move rather than a new camera. Still non the wiser!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Off the top of my head and pulling out the main points from your original post this is what I would do:

1) get a faster smaller and thus more portable OTA more suited to your DSLR

2) then if you are still looking For more challenges, get a CCD based on the fact that you have more DSO targets than us here in the North.

i tried a modded DSLR and yes the Ha response is a bit better but it won't keep you interested for long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So current thinking is OTA upgrade and stick with the unmodded 6D and the NEQ6. So another Newtonian (perhaps larger dia.?) or something else (SCT, Ritchey-Chretien, etc.) Budget prob up to $1,500 (NZD) ish (don't tell the wife!).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Increasing the focal length with a DSLR is not the way I would be going, in fact it would be the opposite. I would go shorter and faster. If you want to keep using reflectors, then go smaller and faster. A wider FoV will be kinder on all aspects of your imaging. A high speed newt with DSLR can work. I personally would go for a refractor based DSLR setup, but then I am lazy and just want things to work as easily as I can make them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember that a modded DSLR will only really show improvement on targets containing HA (red), at the risk of setting Olly off on one you could consider a colour CCD and get the benefit of cooling.

If you're feeling flush you could get a Tak Epsilon :grin:

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both. Not really contemplating longer and keen for faster. Was looking at faster newts perhaps f3.5-f4 as they will still work with my baader mk3 coma corrector. But then will there be enough of a difference to justify the investment?! Then was thinking about 200 to 250 or 300mm. Maybe i should look again at refractors. So much choice! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 08/08/2016 at 15:49, Davey-T said:

Remember that a modded DSLR will only really show improvement on targets containing HA (red), at the risk of setting Olly off on one you could consider a colour CCD and get the benefit of cooling.

If you're feeling flush you could get a Tak Epsilon :grin:

Dave

:D

OK, here's Olly. I would buy a second hand monochrome CCD, either a small Sony chipped Atik or a larger 8300 chipped camera. On the 8300 Atik do have rivals but at a price, and the more affordable 1.25 filters impose their own budget limits. There are fast cameras and fast scopes. CCD cameras are fast. Especially mono ones. Luminance should be 3x faster than OSC but is really at least 4x faster, though obviously you then have to capture colour. Even that is faster than OSC, though, because with OSC you are stuck with the filter balance of red, green, green, green, blue when, for astronomy, the last thing you want is double green. Given the ability to shoot Ha in the moon, the likelihood of a month's productivity in an OSC versus mono shootout is massively weighted towards mono. That is why, as a provider, I switched from OSC and mono to mono and mono.

Apart from the CCD advantages you'd have the fun of learning a new trade.

A Tak Epsilon in occasional use? Every occasion will vanish in attempts to collimate it and sort out orthogonality... It is not a plug and play telescope, though when it is playing it plays rather brilliantly!

Olly

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Olly. Is there general consensus that my next investment should be in ccd and filters rather than better ota/ota upgrades then? Biggest bang for my buck? Assume I'll also need some additional storage for the nextbook plus possibly more power to stay mobile (as my current power supply struggles after a few hours in the cold without camera and cooling draining it more!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By stardude07
      Hello,
      I have a question about filterwheels; SBIG filter wheels specifically. As far as I know they are the only ones that really use the 8 position filter wheels. So I have it loaded with L, R, G, B, Ha, OIII, and SII. So that is seven filters, what goes in the 8th slot???
      Thank you for your insight,
      Christopher
    • By Xiga
      Back in early Feb I tried imaging Markarian's Chain, but after 2 subs I encountered guiding issues (a first for me) so had to give up. 
      So just for kicks and giggles, I decided to process them! ? 
      So this is 2 x 10mins. With the D5300, 80ED and HEQ5-Pro. 'Stacked' (if it's even right to use that term!) in APP, and processed in PS. Then reduced to 75% for posting. 
      Why oh why oh why..... I honestly don't even know myself ?

    • By Deflavio
      I know DSLRs are more for “official” AP imaging and I should probably stick with my trusty ASI224 or maybe think about a 294 or similar sensors but....as probably many, I have a DSLR sitting at home not doing much. Can I do EAA with it?
       
      Today is quite easy to have 24Mp in relativity cheap bodies so why not to use it somehow? Small pixels..I know, but maybe going for wide field and bright objects with fast lenses it may still work and give something interesting. Anyone tried? Any experience? 
       
      What I really like of EAA is the ability to do everything while observing and without the need to come back for long processing sessions. I have searched around a bit but I can’t find a stacking software like Sharpcap for DSLR doing live viewing as well as stacking. I think I could somehow save each frame in a folder and then stack them with DSS (if I got the name right) but can I then control remotely the camera, exposition and have live preview when slewing around?
       
      Just interested to know if anyone know more about this or more in general discuss about DSLR and EAA.
       
      Flavio
    • By Xiga
      Hi guys
      I'm breaking the cardinal rule here of posting late at night, right after finishing PP, so let's see what sense the dawn brings! ? 
      I shot this in the early hrs of 29th of March. There was no moon present (i think!) and conditions were pretty good, AFAIK. 
      This is 28 x 360s, so about 2.75 hrs in total. Taken as usual with the D5300, IDAS-D1, and SW 80ED. 
      APP used for stacking and gradient reduction, everything else done in PS. 
      Would have liked twice, or 3 times, the data, but it's just not happening, so i've just decided to process what i've got. 
      Thanks for looking, and all CC welcome as always ?

    • By masjstovel
      Hi,

      I'm totally New to this hobby and i'm having trouble understanding something in stellarium.
      I have ordered (not recieved) a Sky-Watcher Explorer 150PDS, which has a 25mm eyepiece 50degrees FOV as a default.
      I also have a Nikon D810.

      I wanted to get an idea of what my field of view would be with the 25mm eyepiece (30x on 750mm focal length), 
      and also what it would be With my Nikon D810 mounted shooting prime Focus - no eyepieces.

      What surprised me was that it wasnt much difference between the frame and size of the object i get with 30x magnification (25mm eyepiece), and what i get with the Nikon D810 mounted. 
      I dont get this. What magnification do i get With my DSLR mounted with no eyepiece?



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.