Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Astroboy239

M51 the whirlpool galaxy

Recommended Posts

Hi all, this data is a month old. I and my friend collected this data. Processed by me in pixinsight and Lightroom and photoshop. 20hrs luminance 15xrgb 15xh alpha. Please feel free to comment and critisize. 

Eq8, qhy5 2 autoguider 10''astrograph. Atik 314l. To photograph_sgp. 

 

 

LrMobile2606-2016-0801229898099546386~3.jpeg

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well theres plenty of detail but just a bit over processed for me, looks a little dare i say bling. Cut back a bit on the saturation and sharpening and it would look great.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
7 minutes ago, symesie04 said:

Well theres plenty of detail but just a bit over processed for me, looks a little dare i say bling. Cut back a bit on the saturation and sharpening and it would look great.

I agree - the detail is amazing - I don't think I've seen those red vein like structures so pronounced before but it does seem to be at the expense of boosts in saturation. I know I can get some good detail in my shots using Pixinsight tools but they can sometimes "over process" the image if I'm not careful - great work though :-)

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I love the sharpness! However, I agree the saturation may be a bit much.

Great image though! :icon_biggrin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW!!!  That is just fantastic :) Well done :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You did a great job collecting the data with lots of detail and faint dust. On my mobile device it still looks too harsh. The challenge with this image is to keep the faint detail without the bright parts exploding. Did you use masked stretch as your first stretch?

 

Cheers, 

Wim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ha regions and the dark lanes are extremley well defined but I do find the background a little clipped and the continum is not representative of such a rich data.

A.G

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that the background is a little clipped, causing the fainter parts to 'jump out of nowhere.' It's a great capture though. I'd just give it a little less of everything and I think you'd get more image.

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to agree with the people above, great promise but over-done to my eye. The fainter parts of the galaxies are showing a lot of grain where noise has been over-sharpened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great picture youve got some excellent data there. I agree with the above mentioned, but as long as you're happy with it it's a winner.

Edited by matt-c

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imaging and processing is so subjective and what one person loves another will not.

I personally find this over processed. There's clearly good data in there, but it has been pushed too far for me. I think the best processed images are those that don't look processed......if that makes any sense. At the end of the day, we all learn ways and techniques, so well done for what you have achieved :)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very nice indeed, In this case less is more. :)

you could probably cut back on the colour saturation

a bit more, but a great improvement well done

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's much better IMO :)  I would be very hard pressed to fault it now.  There is gradation right from the background to the very centre of the galaxy - that is excellent -  well done indeed :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great capture the third post is much improved for me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with some - there is some very useable data in there.  But it has been over processed.  I can see the potential of it but its too aggressive.

The details in there but the processing has been too aggressive. Putting my money where my mouth is here is a recent version i processed, note this is a crop from a wide field image that can be seen here so i am not working on same image scale as you and you most likely have more detail than me.

m51 crop.png 

Have another go and gently does it - what ever you did last time try 25% thereof, i think you will be pleasantly surprised.

Paddy

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.