Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

Droogie 2001

First Mars in 2 years - 05.06.16

Recommended Posts

I thought I would have a crack at imaging Mars last night as I haven't taken any planetary images since 2014. I forgot what fun you can have with trying to focus and locate the target on a tiny CMOS chip!
Despite its elevation being a pitiful 16 degrees it did at least produce some detail.

Also tried Saturn but initial results look pretty poor.

ASI120MC, x2 Barlow, Celestron 8SE.
Fire Capture, PIPP,  Auto Stakkert 2, Registax 6, PS 2015CC
2000 frames, best 10% processed

Mars - 05.06.16.jpg

Edited by Droogie 2001
  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What an absoloutly superb, truthful,  image of Mars! You obviously have a hidden talent that I hope you won't keep hidden. 

Thanks so much for posting!

Mike :thumbsup:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one Droogie, I was playing around with Mars and Saturn last night also in Surrey - then from nowhere some cloud came along.

I also use ZWO ASI 120MC + Firecapture; what settings did you use?

Graham

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the positive comments guys.

Graham. Yes I think I had the same clouds as you had :icon_biggrin: . After spending 20min locating and focusing Mars they just rolled in, typical!

Just copied the log file. I also selected the Mars symbol from the Fire Capture pre-sets.
It wasn't too bad with adjusting the exposure as I was aware of not under and over exposing the planet. Nothing worse than being left with a bunch of videos which are impossible to process, been then and done that for sure.

Frames captured=2017
File type=AVI
Extended AVI mode=true
Compressed AVI=false
Binning=no
ROI=800x640
FPS (avg.)=67
Shutter=12.31ms
Gain=84
Gamma=50
WBlue=95
USBTraffic=80
Brightness=0
AutoExposure=off
SoftwareGain=10 (off)
Overclock=15
WRed=52
Histogramm(min)=0
Histogramm(max)=156
Histogramm=61%
Noise(avg.deviation)=n/a
Limit=30 Seconds
Sensor temperature=16.2 °C
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Droogie, very helpful.  Might try again tonight if the Met Office have it right - let's see. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely detail. Last night was excellent seeing here. Very little wobbling about and you could even see some detail on live view.

That is a lovely image.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, that's 3 times the exposure length I was using, perhaps I should up the exposure a little and reduce gain?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that the gain and exposure work it opposites to each other so I never really know if I should apply more exposure and less gain or the opposite.

For once I seemed to get a good balance and considering I hadn't used Fire Capture for nearly 2 years I was pleasantly surprised it came out okay.

What is a little depressing is that following in 2018 the maximum height Mars will get to in the 50 Latitude zone is 14 degrees, however in 2020 it does reach a decent 40 degrees. I think Saturn is even worse for the foreseeable future...:sad2:

This site contains some useful information (scroll to very bottom for Mars elevation stats)

http://www.nakedeyeplanets.com/mars.htm

 

Edited by Droogie 2001
additional content

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice image. I wish we would get a clear night here to have a go but it's just endless cloud every night.

Peter

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mars shift by about two weeks every year, so next year it will be at opposition more or less spot on the solstice, but that won't be much worse than this year, then it improves a little every year as Jupiter drops down the sky rather faster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A very good outcome - next time try to capture for as long as clouds etc allow & you will have far more than 2017 frames to play with which will give you even better outcomes providing the seeing etc is up to what it was here!!!

6 minute long avi's are absolutely fine & what we do always...for  you that would've meant 24.000 frames to work with!

Nothing wrong with your FC settings although you could reduce your ROI...remember that the "height" of the ROI determines whether you can run at any specific maximum frame-rate.(in your case 600 pixels from the settings data you supplied)

Shutter speed multiplied by fps should give you unity for setting the optimum frame-rate/exposure adjustments & in this case you should have been able to increase the exposure to almost 15 milliseconds. (67 x 15 = 1 approx.)

What this means is that instead of 12.31 milliseconds you could have "let more light in" for each frame's capture...the result would have been a higher histogram which you would not have needed so you could have lowered the gain for the same frame-rate.

Setting "Brightness" to "16" also ekes out a bit more on the histogram & allows a tad more lowering of the gain setting - "0" is only necessary if daylight is starting to intrude upon your imaging! :)

Lower gain is always preferable if you can do so...& this should have been achievable in the FC settings...if not, then the 600 pixel high ROI/box you selected for capturing might've been inhibiting this & dropping it down to (say) 550 or 500 should fix anything therein - it has been a long time since I used the 120MC...but them's the facts! ;)

Nonetheless, as I said a very good outcome!!! :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent result, great detail captured there... well done... awesome to see some great success from another 8SE owner.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

I did a reprocess in Registax and used a histogram stretch. I think it makes it less orangey and more natural?

 

 

 

 

Mars_050616_235537_pipp_g3_ap8_Registax._PS-In_progress2.jpg

Edited by Droogie 2001
additional content
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6.6.2016 at 16:08, Droogie 2001 said:

I thought I would have a crack at imaging Mars last night as I haven't taken any planetary images since 2014. I forgot what fun you can have with trying to focus and locate the target on a tiny CMOS chip!

 

Haha 100%!

I found the Spiraling of SharpCap funtion extremely usefull for finding your target. I think I also saw it in other ascom.mount controls but forget where, hints welcome, as Firecapture is IMHO better suited for planetary imaging, alone the AutoAlign is superp and helpfull.

Carsten

Left my images, right calculated from JuPos

Mars_2016.jpg

Edited by calli
Clarify
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You've captured some very good detail there Droogie, well done. I'm using the Celestron Nexstar 8i and I'd be over the moon to get detail like that.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 09/06/2016 at 21:36, Droogie 2001 said:

Thanks.

I did a reprocess in Registax and used a histogram stretch. I think it makes it less orangey and more natural?

 

 

 

 

Mars_050616_235537_pipp_g3_ap8_Registax._PS-In_progress2.jpg

Yup, that beautiful.... nice detailed and natural looking, not over cooked that's easy to do in the quest for ever more detail...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A Mars to be proud of, well done, the detail you have captured is fantastic.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice Mars. I agree with above, I would be very proud of that image. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Kronos831
      Hey guys. Thought about  starting this thread. I feel like we all should inform eachother and newer members alike about the magngifications that can be achieved on planets,that provide the best sharpness/size ratio,depending on the scope and seeing. After this thread has grown a bit, i feel like this should be pinned,as to provide a little guide to newer members that are not experienced with planetary observing,as many will be fooled with the typical 50x per inch of aperture and get disappointed when they find that that image will be dim and blurry.
      For my 8” F/6 Sky-Watcher Dob
      For Saturn i like to use 150x in medium seeing and if i want something a bit bigger , switch to 240x ,which will give me a bigger,but blurrier image.iBut In good seeing, i found that 240x was very usable.When we have perfect conditions, i m certainly trying 300x.
      Mars, isnt very big in the sky right now,so even at high magnifications like 300x it still appears as a small orange dot. For observing mars,I suggest waiting for it to reach opposition.It benifits hugely from it! However,this happens once every 2 years....But 5ere are other planets to keep you occupied until then, such as jupiter,saturn and   Venus.
      For Venus, i use 50-100-120 depending on its phase.
      For  Jupiter, i like to use 150x, as it provides a very sharp image,with key features of the planet such as bands being very detailed.Waiting on my 6mm UWA Skywatcher to bring it to 200 and see how that plays out. Be careful! Don’t magnify jupiter too much, as it will loose much of its features and sharpness.
      Neptune and Uranus: These two will not impress, but are certainly have a nice colour to them. Even ar high magnifications, such as 300x and 400x, they will look like small discs with color in them.Uranus will look be colored green and Neptune a fainter blue.
      Mercury About mercury...Havent gotten the chance to observe it ,so the guys will have to inform you about that?
      Feel free to give your own opinions as to give members a wider source of information to help them observe better ! 
      Cheers and clear skies.
      Kronos
       
    • By Cosmic Geoff
      Got images of Jupiter and Saturn in the morning and a tiny Mars in the evening. Saturn was very low and a fence may have blocked some light. Apparent diameter of Mars is now below 5" and the evening seeing was poor.  
      Used: CPC800, ASI120MC, ADC,  processed in Registax6.
    • By Cosmic Geoff
      I had another go at imaging the shrinking Mars, this time without and with a x2 Barlow lens.  The results are better with the Barlow, which is what one is led to expect.   For whatever reason (probably bad seeing and/or low planets) when I tried a Barlow previously it just made the blur bigger.  Equipment: C8 SE, ASI120MC, x2 Skywatcher kit Barlow element screwed directly into 1.25" barrel of the ZWO camera.   This does seem to give x2 in practice.  I did not use an ADC on the grounds that I shouldn't need one with Mars at an altitude of over 40 degrees.
      3000 image video captured with Sharpcap. Processed in Registax6.  I found that the Sharpcap exposure histogram did not appear to work on such a small image, so had to estimate the exposure.   Yes, optical ADC correction would be better, but the dispersion seemed very small.  Blowing up the image x2 in Registax showed a small colour fringe, which I took out with a single point of correction.
      The images show some surface detail though the contrast is low (if you are using a flatscreen try viewing from below: ?)  Mare Sirenum, with Mare Acidalium just discernible foreshortened at upper right. 


    • By Cosmic Geoff
      Here is an image of Mars I made on 9 Jan this year, with a C8 SE, and ASI120MC camera.  The images are rather small (around 7" dia).  Mars is now much higher in the sky than at opposition, so it seemed worth taking a few farewell images as it diminishes in size. Captured with Sharpcap.
      I did not use the ADC - the images are corrected for AD in the processing in Registax.  This is from a run of 3000 images.  I have included a x3 Photoshop zoom of the same image to indicate the size of Mars at opposition on the same scale.  I was quite pleased to record some surface detail, corresponding with the position of Syrtis Major.  If I'd had more time, I could have tried some images using a Barlow lens. I have just discovered that I can unscrew the lens section from a Skywatcher x2 Barlow and screw it onto the 1.25" nosepiece of the ASI120MC, which will give a more modest zoom (I think).


    • By Willgiffotron
      Hi. I’m kind of new to stargazing and I want to view mars. On the website I bought my telescope from it says that planetary observation can be done with clear images being produced but I can’t see much of Mars and I was wondering what eyepiece would be best it has a 114 mm apature.
      thanks for any help you can provide.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.