Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Astronomy is kewl

Meade Polaris 130EQ Vs Celestron Astromaster 130EQ Vs Meade Polaris 127EQ

Recommended Posts

Hello All,


I recently upgraded from a department store 50mm refractor and got the Celestron Powerseeker 127Eq, but after researching a bit more, I have found out that there are problems in the design of this reflector (Barlow lens built-in). I am currently comparing the Meade Polaris 130EQ, Celestron Astromaster 130EQ and Meade Polaris 127EQ. I just need to know any important details about all 3 of them and know which is the best choice (mount, its setting circles, optics, EPs, etc). I want to know if there are any design problems that come with it (like the C P 127EQ). I would be also be glad to know about how well these telescopes can track celestial objects and if their setting circles are accurate. I know these are a wholesome amount of question, but this will be my first "real" telescope and I hope on using it for the next couple of years,


Thanks a lot!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't vouch for the Meade telescopes, but the Celestron Astromaster telescope would not be much better than the Powerseeker I'm afraid. The mount is still pretty wobbly, and there is no real gain in optical quality or light gathering from the 127mm primary mirror to the 130mm mirror in the Astromaster. I bought one just over a year ago, and never use the scope at all now, although I do occasionally use the mount with another scope until I can afford a more stable  mount to use. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that, but just need to know a few more details like if the design is better in these 3 other telescopes. Some one else who owns the meade(s). Thanks Knighty2112


Edited by Astronomy is kewl

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the links for the telescopes I am looking for review(s) for, 



^also is the motor drive accurate on the Celestron Astromaster as shown in the link^ Also could I do astrophotography with the MD (about 30 or more seconds?) Thanks

Edited by Astronomy is kewl

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both the Celestron Powerseeker 127 and Meade Polaris 127 are Bird-Jones telescopes (built in corrector lens) . 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not personally aware if the Astromaster or Meade Polaris are also Bird-Jones telescopes. I would suggest asking the dealer you are thinking of buying from to research this for you. If the dealer hesitates to do so - find another dealer. A good seller of telescopes is one that takes good care of their customers - both before the sale and after. For reasons to avaoid a Bird-Jones, use the search-engine for these forums.

It would help if you told us what you plan to use the telescope for. Then we could help to find you a very good telescope for your purposes - one's which we are familiar with. And your personal location, so we might give a few good dealers to work with.

Oh - here's a pdf. manual for the Meade Polaris -


We're here to help -


Edited by Dave In Vermont

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 130's are not Jones-Bird but as stated above don't really offer that much over the Powerseeker. Did you return the Powerseeker when you found out about the design? If you didn't I don't see there is much point in spending another few hundred dollars on another scope that might only be marginally better. If you've still got the Powerseeker then I suggest that for now you just continue to use that to learn what your interests are and until you can afford to upgrade to a significantly better scope.

If you have returned it and now need a replacement how serious are you about astrophotography? You might be able to get some afocal shots of bright objects like the moon and planets by holding a camera up to the eyepiece but I doubt either the mounts or motors on these scopes are up to the task of anything requiring long exposures. If you really want to get into astrophotography you'll need a much bigger budget than these options suggest you have. 

If on the other hand you're actually mostly interested in making visual observations then perhaps a 6" Dobsonian would suit you better, giving you a bit more light gathering and resolving power and also a more stable base than the cheap tripods can give you. Canadian Telescopes (I assume that is where you are from the links provided) offer the Orion SkyQuest XT6 for $415, if you can stretch your budget that far.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By BenR
      I am new to astronomy, and recently purchased a Celestron Starsense Explorer LT 114AZ, and just for a start, I used the finderscope to locate exactly a random star, and I looked through the eyepiece and just saw a blurry white image. I was using a 25mm eyepiece lens, and then decided to put on the 2x Barlow lens with the 25mm lens, and nothing changed. Is this normal? What should I do to improve?
    • By Mike Read
      I currently have a Celestron 9.25" SCT and am in the process of upgrading the focuser to baader steeltrack. I have the f/6.3 FR on back order. My question is: where will the FR fit in the image train? Is it compatible?
      Thanks Mike
    • By James1967
      Ok, after lots of research, I finally decided on the above and just ordered with FLO.  Now got a few weeks wait so can keep exploring the sky manually with by binoculars and learn as many pitfalls as possible about the Evo 9.25”.  The only accessory I ordered for now is a dew shield, but I’m expecting I will want to get a 2” visual back, star diagonal and wide angle eyepiece (possibly 0.63 focal reducer too) to get the max field of view possible when I so choose.  Any views on whether StarSense is worth it - it seems pretty simple to align without it (I may come to regret saying this)
      So why am I posting?  Just after any and all advice for a beginner, in particular regarding maximising field of view down the line (the relatively narrow FOV was the only real downside of the Evo 9.25” for me) and any recommended accessories to enhance my viewing pleasure over time.  Any other general top tips also very welcome. 
      I look forward to being able to help others in due course when I have something more than roughly zero knowledge and experience!
    • By Kadersin
      Hey guys and gals!
      I currently own a Celestron Powerseeker 127EQ.  Do you think a NexStar 6SE is a worthwhile upgrade?
      Pros / cons?
    • By aeneas
      Hi all,
      Christmas came early; my new C11 scope with CGX-L mount has arrived; so have many accessories including the entire ZWO ecosystem (2600MC camera, 174MM mini guide camera, ASIAIR Pro controller, ZWO electronic focuser, small guide scope). Unfortunately ZWO does not provide much documentation / set-up guides...
      I need some help setting this up and to make sure that I don't screw up something during my first attempts before I learn more about how to use this well... Particularly I am considering whether best to learn step-by-step or should I try to automate and connect as much as possible so that I start learning immediately via the ultimate set-up I intend to have (i.e. via ASIAR app)?
      1) Setting up for visual:
      A) Can the CGX-L GoTo mount guide decently enough itself to follow equatorial movement once a visual target is identified and in focus or should I immediately set-up the ZWO 174MM guide camera and do auto-guiding through ASIAIR pro even for visual? When attaching accessories to the rear end of the scope, I saw there are 6 screws in the back row - are these all safe to use for mounting guide scopes etc.? (see #1 comment in the attached image) C) For visual - should I set-up the ZWO 174MM guide camera through the ZWO mini guidescope or should I set-up the Celestron Off-Axis-Guider even for visual? D) Should I learn to focus first using the manual focuser of the Celestron, or should I install the ZWO electronic focuser asap to connect with the rest of the system; will the electronic focuser help me at all if I don't use an OAG to provide focus feedback back to the ASIAIR pro? I'm a bit lost on this one here... E) What is the best way to mount the ZWO ASIAIR Pro to C11? I was thinking to attach it to the underside of the dovetail of the OTA (see #3 comment in the attached image). Does this make sense? What mounting adapter should I buy to make this work? is there any other even better way of attaching the ASIAIR controller? F) In the original package there were two screws attached to the underside of the dovetail on the OTA - see #2 comment in the attached image. G) eyepiece comment: don't worry about the eyepiece - I have the celestron one mounted while I play with the set-up; I have a Nikon 17-14 NAV HW and TeleVue Ethos 8mm and Panoptic 41mm for actual viewing.   
      2) Setting up for photography
      A) I saw a lot of C11 EDGE HD image trains with a similar camera set-up so I will do my best to make this work... will come back if more questions; however I have one particular question here: once the scope is set-up for astrophotography with the entire image train well adjusted... but then you quickly want to switch to visual (e.g. kids come up and you want to spend 30min visual observing the target before going back to imaging)... what is the best way to switch between one an another? At what point to you "break" the image train and insert the 2" diagonal?

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.