Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Astronomy is kewl

Meade Polaris 130EQ Vs Celestron Astromaster 130EQ Vs Meade Polaris 127EQ

Recommended Posts

Hello All,


I recently upgraded from a department store 50mm refractor and got the Celestron Powerseeker 127Eq, but after researching a bit more, I have found out that there are problems in the design of this reflector (Barlow lens built-in). I am currently comparing the Meade Polaris 130EQ, Celestron Astromaster 130EQ and Meade Polaris 127EQ. I just need to know any important details about all 3 of them and know which is the best choice (mount, its setting circles, optics, EPs, etc). I want to know if there are any design problems that come with it (like the C P 127EQ). I would be also be glad to know about how well these telescopes can track celestial objects and if their setting circles are accurate. I know these are a wholesome amount of question, but this will be my first "real" telescope and I hope on using it for the next couple of years,


Thanks a lot!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't vouch for the Meade telescopes, but the Celestron Astromaster telescope would not be much better than the Powerseeker I'm afraid. The mount is still pretty wobbly, and there is no real gain in optical quality or light gathering from the 127mm primary mirror to the 130mm mirror in the Astromaster. I bought one just over a year ago, and never use the scope at all now, although I do occasionally use the mount with another scope until I can afford a more stable  mount to use. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that, but just need to know a few more details like if the design is better in these 3 other telescopes. Some one else who owns the meade(s). Thanks Knighty2112


Edited by Astronomy is kewl

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the links for the telescopes I am looking for review(s) for, 



^also is the motor drive accurate on the Celestron Astromaster as shown in the link^ Also could I do astrophotography with the MD (about 30 or more seconds?) Thanks

Edited by Astronomy is kewl

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both the Celestron Powerseeker 127 and Meade Polaris 127 are Bird-Jones telescopes (built in corrector lens) . 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not personally aware if the Astromaster or Meade Polaris are also Bird-Jones telescopes. I would suggest asking the dealer you are thinking of buying from to research this for you. If the dealer hesitates to do so - find another dealer. A good seller of telescopes is one that takes good care of their customers - both before the sale and after. For reasons to avaoid a Bird-Jones, use the search-engine for these forums.

It would help if you told us what you plan to use the telescope for. Then we could help to find you a very good telescope for your purposes - one's which we are familiar with. And your personal location, so we might give a few good dealers to work with.

Oh - here's a pdf. manual for the Meade Polaris -


We're here to help -


Edited by Dave In Vermont

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 130's are not Jones-Bird but as stated above don't really offer that much over the Powerseeker. Did you return the Powerseeker when you found out about the design? If you didn't I don't see there is much point in spending another few hundred dollars on another scope that might only be marginally better. If you've still got the Powerseeker then I suggest that for now you just continue to use that to learn what your interests are and until you can afford to upgrade to a significantly better scope.

If you have returned it and now need a replacement how serious are you about astrophotography? You might be able to get some afocal shots of bright objects like the moon and planets by holding a camera up to the eyepiece but I doubt either the mounts or motors on these scopes are up to the task of anything requiring long exposures. If you really want to get into astrophotography you'll need a much bigger budget than these options suggest you have. 

If on the other hand you're actually mostly interested in making visual observations then perhaps a 6" Dobsonian would suit you better, giving you a bit more light gathering and resolving power and also a more stable base than the cheap tripods can give you. Canadian Telescopes (I assume that is where you are from the links provided) offer the Orion SkyQuest XT6 for $415, if you can stretch your budget that far.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By JamieHardcastle
      Hi everyone,
      My other half bought me (us) a Celestron 130 for my birthday recently.
      I have watched tutorials and done a lot of reading about collimating and various other tips since alongside several hours peering through the telescope.
      I can achieve a very crisp image of the moon which is awesome. However, trying to get a decent focus on Mars/Jupiter Saturn is proving very frustrating. The only non-blurred image of any of them is a single white-point, non dissimilar to what I can see via the naked eye. 
      i’ve tried both the 20mm & 10mm lenses and adjusted the focus in and out all the way.
      Any advice would be gratefully received.
      thank you, in advance.
    • By MountainDog
      I have just encountered an error message which says "NO RESPONSE 16" when I power up my 130slt. Has anyone else experienced this issue?
    • By NightSky_Wanderer
      I am hoping someone here may be able to offer some help or advice. I have submitted a support ticket with Celestron but I am still waiting for a reply and would really like to get this working ready for the next clear sky!
      I recently brought a starsense but have not been able to use it because it comes up with the following errors,
      Err: Model Num
      The telescope model could not be read and initialization cannot proceed.
      Critical error!
      File: ..\source\mo
      Line: 1468
      An unexpected error occurred that may cause the HC to not opperate normally.
      When updating the controller and camera it finishes succesfully but when I check for new updates it proceeds to install the same one again and again.
      I can still control the mount and I think the camera tried to do an alignment in my room.
      I have a Celestron Nexstar 6SE.
    • By StarGazingSiouxsie
      Just thought I'd share this in case you haven't seen it already. A recent (September 2020) article added to the Celestron 'Knowledge Base' on collimating SCTs.
      I don't claim to have seen all articles on collimation, but this is defs one of the best that I have seen. 

    • By KarlosFandango
      I have the aforementioned telescope but not used it in several years. It's just been sat, quietly out of the way in a small cupboard (dry, dark, nothing amazing) but not stored in it's box as perhaps it could have been. Nonetheless, I went to take it out as a friend had asked me to take it to his for an evening's viewing pleasure. I tried the batteries I'd just bought (16xrechargables) but was unable to get any signs of life. Between myself and a friend who's somewhat more conversant with electricity than myself, we discovered so far that there's no signs anywhere of life from it - but we're not (as yet) sure whether it's a poor connection from the battery compartment or the switch. We do know the batteries are good. 
      Any advice on narrowing down causes, please?

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.