Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep14_banner.thumb.jpg.27eb9b06c9c8a1fe5ac3bae21c92743b.jpg

Sign in to follow this  
DaveyLeo10

What's the longest exposure time I can expect with the Celestron NexStar 130SLT? Using a DSLR and the x2 barlow t-adapter?

Recommended Posts

I know it's not an ideal scope for astrophotography and I'm not expecting anything special since I know about EQ mounts etc. If it could get up to 30 second exposures I'd be happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is it your trying to image?. what concerns me is that you're after long exposures whicch leads me to believe its deep space but if thats the case, you'll want to lose the barlow. If its planetary then keep the barlow but lose the long exposures.

Then there are other factors that come into play for long exposures. what is the light pollution like where you are? is your mount tracking? the list goes on :)

can I suggest the book https://www.firstlightoptics.com/books/making-every-photon-count-steve-richards.html ? its something of an aspiring imagers bible :D

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. This isn't my first scope, my main scope is the Nexstar Evo 9.25' with a wedge. Really I got the 130SLT is because I'm heading to Canada for two months where the skies are darker and I've always wanted a reflector. I use the Canon 60Da DSLR for my imaging. I have to use a Barlow because I won't be able to reach focus with my DSLR. I've done plenty of deep sky imaging I'm literally just hoping someone has tried using this scope for deep sky imaging. It's not the only reason I bought the scope, it will be mainly used for visual anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm - at the native focal length and that pixel size  you might get 30secs out of the SLT mount if you are lucky. With the barlow I guess you are talking half that at best. Still, being an alt-az you can't do much more than 1min anyway due to field rotation.

NigelM

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be happy with that. It just gets confusing when people talk about long exposure. To me anything over 60 seconds is a long exposure. 30 seconds would be more than enough because I'm sure I can get good results via stacking. Will see!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the individual SLT mounts might be variable. I have always done 30sec exposures on mine (at 660mm FL, 2 arcsec pixels - that's the SLT 102 refractor) and happily thrown away maybe 25% of the subs and been reasonably pleased with the results from the rest. However, I have a friend with the same setup who couldn't get anywhere with 30secs and went down to 15 sec.  His pics still look OK though.

NigelM

Edited by dph1nm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I guess I won't know for sure until I get my hands on it and try for myself. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By JonathanH
      Hey all,
      My Celestron 127eq telescope's RA setting circle isn't moving properly with the mount when I try and adjust my RA. It lags behind, seemingly sticking onto the bottom of my mount. What should I do to fix this and get my setting circle right?
    • By astrosathya
      Finally I processed the Comet Neowise captured from Bangalore.
      Simple Set-up:
      Canon80D, Sigma 70-300 DG APOII @100mm F/4.
      ISO2000, 50x5s
      Stacked in Deep Sky Stacker
      Processed in Pixinsight.
      Lots of noise as I wanted to pull out both tails

    • By Karan05
      Hi i own Celestron 130EQ which comes with 20mm erect EP and 10mm EP.... i bought a GSO ED 3x Barlow... The focus is not very sharp while using Barlow... Is it the EP at fault ???? Is it worth upgrading to Kelner or a Plossl ???? 
    • By StarGazingSiouxsie
      Hello there,
      I told you it wouldn't be long before I started asking for help!
      I can download CFM from Celestron's support page. I download the zipped file, extract the contents but that's as far as I can get. 
      The file in the unzipped file shows as a 'Jar' file instead of an exe. That naugghty little jar justs sits there and will not dance for me. 
      I am running Windows 10. I have latest version of Java installed. I have tried turning around 3 times with one hand on my head and one on my tummy. No luck.
      I am neuro A typical, for the record, so that accounts for why I absolutely MUST know how to (please) open this file even though the odds are my kit is up to date. 
      Seriously, this is driving me nuts. I found stargazerslounge via my searches in trying to solve this problem and I thought to myself what a nice vibe this ite has. so I joined. 
      Any help / advice / chocolate (milk or dark) , money (PP or cash  ) all very gratfefully and cheek kissingly received. 
    • By Abhinav
      Can I reach focus with a DSLR and a focal reducer like with a barlow because my telescope does not have enough inward focus .
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.