Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_globular_clusters_winners.thumb.jpg.13b743f39f721323cb5d76f07724c489.jpg

MikeODay

Nebulae and Clusters in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC )

Recommended Posts

Nebulae and Clusters in the North East Quadrant of the Small Magellanic Cloud ( Tucana Constellation )

( Contains:  NGC 292, 299, 306, 330, 346, 361, 371, 395, 411, 416, 422 & IC  1611, 1612, 1624, 1641 ).

Nebulae and Clusters in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC ) - by Mike O'Day ( https://500px.com/mikeoday )

The Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) is a "small" spiral galaxy about 7000 light years in diameter and is one of our near neighbours. At 'only' around 200,000 light years distance, it shines brightly in the southern sky and is clearly visible to the naked eye even in moderately ligh polluted skies.  

Links:

https://500px.com/MikeODay

http://photo.net/photos/MikeODay

Details:

Image centre ~ RA 1h 2m, Dec -72deg 2'
Skywatcher Quattro 10" f4 Newtonian
Skywatcher AZ Eq6 GT Mount
Orion Short Tube 80mm guide scope & auto guider PHD2
Baader MPCC Mark 3 Coma Corrector & UHC-S 'nebula' filter
Nikon D5300 (unmodified)
Long exposure noise reuduction on 
Field of view (deg) ~ 1.35 x 0.90
38 x 200 sec ISO 800 over two nights
Pixinsight & Photoshop
11 & 12 October 2015 (re-processed 9 Apr 2016 )

Edited by mike005
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very nice image Mike its a very bizy image

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The detail is lost in the reduced size and compressed image above and below.   To see far better detail in the numerous small nebulae and star clusters, click on the image then press the "Full Size" button to see the image full size.

Click on image and then press "Full Size" button ...

image.jpeg

Edited by mike005

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great shot Mike, not seen this galaxy before an unusual looking one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, andyo said:

Great shot Mike, not seen this galaxy before an unusual looking one

Thanks Andy.

As you can see from the position of the rectangular frame in the SkySafari screen capture below, my image covers just a small portion of the larger Small Magellanic Cloud dwarf galaxy.  Wider images that capture the whole galaxy confirm your observation that it is unusual; I am still facinated by the artificial looking hexagonal nebula that looks like the lens flare from a stopped down lens.

image.jpeg

( SkySafari screen capture )

Edited by mike005
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Rhushikesh-Canisminor
      Hello to all!
      Posting a photograph of the Summer Milky Way band that I took last week.
      However, I do not know how should I feel about this!
      This is when the band was right overhead, which is a rare sight for us and happens only when monsoon season is delayed. There was decent glow towards horizon but literally nothing at zenith.
      19 degrees north latitude, around Bortle 3 level sky, taken using Nikon 5300, basic lens.
      And with this, I prepare to have no view of stars till September ends 

    • By Xiga
      Hi guys
      First things first, apologies for posting this one out of season. A combination of no astro dark, crappy weather, and being busy at work has meant that there's no imaging getting done at all these days. So, i've had to turn to old data to re-process, and this data set was an obvious candidate as i was never happy with how it came out originally. And looking back on it now with fresh eyes, boy did it need it! 
      Nikon D5300, SW 80ED, HEQ5-Pro. 
      3 x 1200s, 2 x 1380s, and 4 x 1500s of Ha
      9 x 1200s of Oiii. 
      11 x 480s with an IDAS-D1, for RGB stars only
      7 Hrs 54 Mins in Total. 

      Stacked in APP and processed in PS. 
      Combined as SHO (using a 70/30 blend of Ha/Oiii for the Sii). 
      The main differences this time were, using Starnet++ to create the starless versions, using more Ha in the synthesized Sii (70% instead of 50% last time), but mostly the improvement has come from toning down the stretch a lot (ok, a heck of a lot!) before making the colour map for the tone-mapping. From then on it was immediately apparent that i'd made a massive boo-boo first time round 🙈
      I've included a 1080p rotated crop too, as i quite liked the framing.
      Feels like ages since i last did any NB imaging. I almost forgot how much i enjoy it! 🙂 


       
       
      And rather embarrassingly, here's the original. Try not to laugh too hard! 😂 😂 😂

    • By Rhushikesh-Canisminor
      Hello to all!
      Just posting some of the images I took recently!
      (Total first attempt from someone who can't even hold a camera properly)
      I was out to conduct a public overnight sky observation event, which was the last event before 6 months of monsoon. For a lot of time, we had cloud cover too!
      These images don't include much of editing more than just some basic stuff in cellphone. I forgot to take the photos in RAW so either way I can't do much!
      Quite happy with the first attempt. Will improve even more in next season!
      Nikon 5300, with the basic 18-55 lens.
      Any suggestions appreciated!
      Thanks! 




    • By Saj_37uk
      Looking for the 2" low profile extension tube that is provided with most of the skywatcher scopes. I have a used 190MN that didn't come with the extension tube and need it to get accurate focus. 
       
      I believe Orion scopes may have one too.
    • By fifeskies
      The weights from my NEQ6 are beginning to look scruffy.
      Is there a good colour match car type spray that anyone would recommend for sprucing them up.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.