Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Tue and Wed BBC2


DaveS

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, OneEyedSam said:

Bbc4 for Jim al kalili

 

Yes, thanks for the correction comes from posting in a hurry and from memory.

To clarify, Tue BBC4 9 o/c Jim al Khalili, Wed BBC2 8 o/c Horizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Jim Al Khalili's two programmes on the beginning and (tonight's) end of the universe were excellent. So good to watch a science documentary with some pace. He covered an enormous amount of material in two hours. He didn't muck about.  Good to see some really complicated ideas  explained so well and so succinctly. Some of the details of who and how the main discoveries were made were new to me. It was almost like a foundation course in cosmology. Well done, Jim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thumbs-up from me as well.

Good that he gave credit to Hoyle's great achievement of the "nuclear furnace", not something that is oft mentioned these days, Hoyle usually gets prtrayed as the great nay-sayer of the "Big Bang".

I shall have to go back to my books but I thought that the nuclear exothermic? synth stopped with iron, not carbon ? ( prob me/age related !) and he didnt follow up with the synth  of higher elements needing supernovae. Still,, cant cover the universe and everything in just two episodes I suppose :)

Anyone know where the Trees and H-R diagram sequence was shot ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree about Hoyle. His contribution is also a wonderful demonstration of how science works. People who don't understand it are often dismissive of theory, mistakingly saying  "It's just a theory". Yet there was Hoyle using his theoretical understanding of the processes to predict a process which was subsequently verified by experiment.  Brilliant! 

My recollection was that exoteric synthesis stops with iron in stars. I think Jim chose carbon because it's so essential to life.  The synthesis of carbon is a bottleneck in the process isn't it. It requires the energies to be absolutely right to work. It's been used as one of the key processes, like some physical constants, which if they were a gnat's whisker different we wouldn't be here.

Don't know where the trees were. Lovely looking place. I'm guessing the USA. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.