Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

russp

M1 Crab Nebula and PixInsight Workflow

Recommended Posts

M1 captured 13th March 2016 with 127mm F7.5 APO triplet 0.8x reducer; Skywatcher AZ-EQ6-GT, Atik 314L+ OSC, Sequence Generator Pro, PixInsight. Not sure I've got the focus nailed although it was set using the auto focus routine in SGP.  14 600sec light frames with superbias from 200frames and 50 flats. No darks used (conscious decision following comments on this forum about the need for them). 

PixInsight Process; Preprocess -> Super Bias from bias frames - Master flat from flats with bias subtracted - Light Frames calibrated, debayered, cosmetic corrected, weighted, registered and integrated. Processing - Dynamic Crop - Dynamic Background Extraction - Colour Calibration - SNCR - MLT Noise Reduction (masked) - Stretched with Masked Stretch - Local Histogram Equalisation (masked) - Curves transformation - MLT Noise Reduction (masked) - ACDNR - Reduce Colour background/contrast with MLT (masked) and Histogram Transformation(masked)  - Curves Transformation - Boost Colour in nebula with MLT (masked) and Colour Saturation - Curves Saturation overall - and Curves Saturation to stars only (masked) .

Any pointers on steps to improve it or ways to improve my processing welcomed - still wading through tutorials and videos to get my head round PixInsight 

Crab_Neb_final.jpg

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very fine image. I've never tried my hands on M1, but what I understand from this forum is that it can be a difficult target to get right.

To me it seems that you have overdone some of the brighter stars. The core of the large star  on the right has a blueish core and a halo/corona that is much more red.

Also you seem to have some chromatic abberation.

I've seen a short tutorial on the Pixinsight forum how you can correct for CA:

separate the RGB channels, put them through StarAlignment with one of the channels as a reference. Then stack the three resulting images.

Simple and straight forward, but with amazing results (at least in the presentation on PI forum)

 

Here's a link

http://pixinsight.com/forum/index.php?topic=9536.0

 

Cheers,

Edited by wimvb
added link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wim makes a good suggestion with the stars above to get the channels to line up better. Also, i wouldnt use Masked Stretch for taking the image non-linear, it gives a very soft looking result. I found that using Histogram Transformation gives a much better contrast base to work off. If you wanted to work on the stars after that then i would then create a masked stretch version and blend its stars with the HT version using a star mask and Pixel Math. Theres a good tutorial for this method from John on this page:  cloudedout.squarespace.com/blog/?offset=1418583715170

Callum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good shot of a difficult target. Not sure if its the focus but the stars look a little blurred. Worth trying the masked stretch on just the stars as Callum suggests. I would recommend Harry pages tutorials for PI he does a good one on the masked stretch for blending in the stars

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By mikemabel
      These are my last images of 2019 taken with my ED72 and 183mm pro to be replaced by a 533pro
      These targets are not easy due to location trees etc except M1 , there was a bright moon as well so are all lucky shots
      but at last i have taken them warts and all . My guiding was all off as well
      Anyway a merry Christmas to you all and a Happy new year 
       
       



    • By codeman
      IC4604 in LRGB Filters. Taking for Namibia during my visit in June 2019. This beautiful nebula is part of the rho Ophiuchi colorful cloud, i the center a 3 blue bright stars the reflect the blue light on the nebula.
      Photo Details:
      Lum - 20 x 5min = 100min
      RGB - 5x5min for each channel at BIN2, 75min
      Total Exposure: 175Min (~3 Hours)
      Telescope: ASA 12'' F3.6
      Mount: DDM 85 Unguided
      Camera: FLI 16200 Mono
      Filters: Astrodon
      Thanks for watching,
      Haim
      My Flicker Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/101543943@N04/

        

    • By mikemabel
      My first image of M76 A bit rushed as clear nights are a rarity now
      30x120s Bin 2 Luminance ,SW 102 , ZWO 183MM Pro , OVL field flattener ,guided , processed in Gimp
      Took some Ha as well but poor results for some reason
      Seems an Oiii filter may have brought out some more detail
       
      i know its not great but just chuffed to have imaged it
       
       
       
       
       


    • By MartinB
      This has been a bit of a project.  Last year I worked out that my 200mm Canon F2.8 lens and ASI1600 would frame the whole of the Veil complex quite nicely.  I captured Ha and OIII data for the east and west nebulae with a Tak FSQ 106 and added this into the widefield image.  Although the Tak data had to be shrunk down it did add a bit of extra resolution where it was needed.  
      The difficulty for me has been the processing.  I have found it really difficult to tease out the faint wisps of detail and have tried the usual routines of micro contrast adjustments using curves along with Scott Rosen's Screen blend/mask inversion method but the results weren't great owing to the close proximity of faint and bright nebulosity.  I'd heard about the PI process tool for removing stars, Starnet, so loaded this and had a rare foray into PI.  This proved very helpful.  It was a luminence created from Ha and OIII using the 200mm lens with the Tak data mixed in.  Then the starless layer was added in PS with the screen blend mode at 50% opacity.  The nebulosity detail was so well preserved I didn't need a mask.  After blending I reduced the stars a bit more using the starless layer again and darken as the blend at 50%.  I should really unleash some of the stars to add a bit of "punch" but I've wrestled with this data enough for now!  I plan to use it further as I look deeper into the Gorgon that is PixInsight!
      Telescope: Tak 106 for E and W veils.  Canon 200mmL lens
      Camera: ZWO ASI 1600 pro mono cmos, Gain 150, offset 50
      Filters: Baader 7nm OIII and Ha
      E+W Veil 10x30 mins each channel for each nebula.  Whole complex 50x5mins for each channel
      Captured with SGP, calibrated, aligned and combined with PI, processed mainly with PS but PI for Starnet.  Ha mapped to red and OIII to both blue and green

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.