Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

Hi all, for my next upgrade on my Skywatcher Startravel 120mm refractor I'm thinking of upgrading the focuser to a dual speed 2" Crayford focuser http://www.firstlightoptics.com/skywatcher-focusers/sky-watcher-dual-speed-2-crayford-focuser-for-sky-watcher-refractors.html

A couple of questions though before I possibly fork out for one in the next month or so;

1) Does it need any other adapter ring or anything to fit OK into the existing place where the stock focuser sits on the ST120? It is just a straight swap right?

2) Does the two speed focuser action significantly improve the action to get a sharper focus much better and easier?

I currently have a Skywatcher Auto focuser fitted to the stock focuser on the scope, but find the constant small jabs back and forth you have to do on the keypad a little annoying to get good focus, and hope the finer focusing option on the Crayford focuser might be easier to achieve by hand again if fitted to the scope.

Regards,

Gus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it sounds like its slipping from what you say, before buying new have you thought about adjusting it, or locking it with the brake ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, faulksy said:

it sounds like its slipping from what you say, before buying new have you thought about adjusting it, or locking it with the brake ?

No, it stays in focus OK once focus is achieved. I did tighten the rack up a little when I fitted the focuser motor, and I lock of the focus when I do achieve it too. I just find it a little tricky to get sharp focus well without having to jab the buttons on the focuser a few times. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have owned one of those SW Dual-speed focusers and must say they are one of the best value upgrades I have encountered. Very solidly built and a massive step up in quality from the standard focuser. The action is extremely smooth and the weight of the unit really helps with the overall balance of the scope. You will not need an adapter. The upgrade can be completed in about 2 minutes :smile:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, DRT said:

I have owned one of those SW Dual-speed focusers and must say they are one of the best value upgrades I have encountered. Very solidly built and a massive step up in quality from the standard focuser. The action is extremely smooth and the weight of the unit really helps with the overall balance of the scope. You will not need an adapter. The upgrade can be completed in about 2 minutes :smile:

Thanks for the feedback. Cheers! :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've recently owned one of the Skywatcher refractor crayford focusers as well and it was a pretty good focuser. I used it on a 150mm F/8 Skywatcher. The only thing you need to bear in mind is that it does not come with an integral finder shoe like the stock focuser has.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, John said:

I've recently owned one of the Skywatcher refractor crayford focusers as well and it was a pretty good focuser. I used it on a 150mm F/8 Skywatcher. The only thing you need to bear in mind is that it does not come with an integral finder shoe like the stock focuser has.

Thanks John. I know I'll need to do a little DIY to my scope to refit the finder scope. Just need to have a steady hand when I drill some holes to fit a new synta shoe. :) 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Knighty2112 said:

Thanks John. I know I'll need to do a little DIY to my scope to refit the finder scope. Just need to have a steady hand when I drill some holes to fit a new synta shoe. :) 

Or just buy a Rigel or a Telrad :wink:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the GSO 10:1 dual-speed Crayford. These are about the same animal. And the focusing is excellent indeed. Night & day difference from the single-speed variety. You'll be a happy camper.

Upgrade away -

Dave

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Knighty2112 Hi to you, I was directed here by my friend Kim, I have just posted the very same question after using my ST 120mm and struggling with the stock focuser. Did you get one and if so does it improve massively over the stock one supplied?

                                              Dave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Dave In Vermont said:

I use the GSO 10:1 dual-speed Crayford. These are about the same animal. And the focusing is excellent indeed. Night & day difference from the single-speed variety. You'll be a happy camper.

Upgrade away -

Dave

Thanks Dave. Just got to save up the money now! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, menacegtr said:

@Knighty2112 Hi to you, I was directed here by my friend Kim, I have just posted the very same question after using my ST 120mm and struggling with the stock focuser. Did you get one and if so does it improve massively over the stock one supplied?

                                              Dave:

Hi Dave. Not got one yet. I'm hoping if funds allow after I get paid to get it at the end of this month. If not it will be in May when I get it. All people who have responded have great things to say over it, so it should be a great upgrade to the scope & make focusing much smoother & easier. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, DRT said:

Or just buy a Rigel or a Telrad :wink:

HI DRT. Ive heard people rave about the Telrad, but to be honest i prefer a little magnifiction when I use my finderscope, so most likely will never use a Telrad or Orion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks for that, I was hoping you had it already. I think I will order one Monday 21/3/  As you said everyone is raving about them. I will post some pics and do a short review after I have used it. Cant wait to junk the supplied one, its just plain horrible.

                                                         Dave:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also put a larger diameter focus-wheel on my ST80 after replacing the focuser with the 10:1 Crayford. This adds an other layer of fine-tuning the focused image to crystal clarity.

You might say I like my little ST80.

Dave

56ec618daf88e_FineFocusKnobbyScopeStuff.

Edited by Dave In Vermont
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

20160324_132247.jpg.63c82ebc79c343eb7f44

Finally got my Dual speed 2" Crayford focuser for my Startravel 120. I must say it is a huge improvement over the standard focuser, I can make very tinny  increments to get very fine focus, and the barrel does not move up and down while looking in the eyepiece while focusing. Its a very heavy sturdy upgrade that hopefully will make a huge performance increase when viewing the night sky. A word of caution though, I had to wet and dry the inside of the adapter the white piece that comes with the scope to get it to fit, it is a very tight fit but a fine piece of wet and dry made getting the new Crayford to fit onto the adapter. Also my 2" diagonal works but when I try a Barlow I cannot get focus, not enough inward travel. If you use the standard diagonal that comes with the scope there is no problem. Why is that, its a shame that I cannot use this new focuser with my 2" dielectric diagonal with a Barlow. I will have to try a 4mm eyepiece at 150x mag to try and eradicate using a Barlow at all. As I said I can use all of my eye pieces with the new Crayford without problem but no good with a Barlow unless I revert back to the standard SkyWatcher 90 Degree Star Diagonal 1.25" and the 45 erecting prism. I have outlaid money into a Skywatcher 2" Di-Electric Star Diagonal and the Skywatcher 45° Erecting Prism 2",that I cannot use with my new Crayford, but as I said the 2" Di-Electric Star Diagonal works okay with out resorting to a Barlow. Its just a shame but there you go. Please anyone wanting this for a ST 120 be aware of what I have said. Fortunately I can afford this short coming so I am not totally gutted, I can put these items away and use another time. So to end this the new Dual speed 2" Crayford focuser is going to be probably the best investment I have made. and while using the standard supplied SkyWatcher 90 Degree Star Diagonal 1.25" and the 45 erecting prism you will have no problems at all. I am very happy with it. I hope this helps others

                                                                                 Regards. Dave:

20160324_131938.jpg

20160324_132007.jpg

20160324_132159.jpg

20160324_172848[1].jpg

20160324_172726[1].jpg

20160324_172755[1].jpg

Edited by menacegtr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks nice. A little worried about the Barlow. I have a Celestron Omni 2x Barlow, and it would be a shame not to be able to use it with my 2" dielectric diagonal. Not a deal breaker, but something to consider at least. Thanks for the feed back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is a shame but like you said not a deal breaker. Don't forget I am using a Revelation Astro 2.5x Barlow Lens 1.25", not sure if a 2x would be better?. The smoothness of the dial is just so precise you will not be disappointed, the smaller dial is just fantastic, ultra minute adjustments. I don't no what the deal with these 2" Di-Electric Star Diagonals not getting focus it beats me. I hope if I get a real good Skywatcher 90 Diagonal 1.25" with a compression fitting I will keep focus. I don't want to use the standard diagonal as I don't want to mare my X-CEL LX eyepieces up. maybe its not a case of using a Barlow as long as you can push the scope not quite to its limits. This scope has about 240x or so at best, so I am hoping if I can stretch to a 4mm at 150x mag I would not need a Barlow. Just remember knighty 2112 if you stick with a decent 1.25" diagonal (dielectric) a Barlow will be fine. I will make some enquires unless someone here can advise. All I will say about the Crayford is its an exceptional bit of kit, I am glad I finally got one, wont be using the supplied one again that's for sure

                                  Dave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info on this focuser. I've been thinking about upgrading and now I think I'll go for it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly, an emergency has cropped up so will have to hold off getting my new focuser until May now! :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

20160326_104501.jpg20160326_104445.jpg

These are the exact settings I left the focuser on last night 25/3/ while viewing the moon real close up with my SkyWatcher 5mm UWA Planetary Eyepiece, without a Barlow. As you can see there is a little headroom for a closer view lets say with a 4mm

                                          Dave:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave, is the focuser longer than the stock focuser fitted? Looking at it it doesn't seem longer, but might be a little hard to know for sure unless measured? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tried to line up the 2 focusers up exactly, you can see that the new Crayford is defiantly longer, that's why it wont Barlow with the 2" diagonal. I tried the Barlow with the supplied SkyWatcher 90 Degree Star Diagonal 1.25" and the 45 erecting prism And I have no problem with focus. Before i put the adapter flange on the scope I tried carefully inserting the Crayford into the tube further then it would allow with the flange and you can get all the focus you want but you would have to take a bit of the back (not an impossible job to undertake) to get the focuser further in. But like I said I can achieve all the magnification I wont without using a Barlow. I have very good Celestron X-CEL LX eyepiece's so my scope will thank me for that, and without using a Barlow I think the view is clearer and brighter.

                                                 Dave

20160326_112345.jpg

20160326_112357.jpg

20160326_112413.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say there is about 3 quarters of an inch difference at the back of both focusers, the Crayford being said distance longer minus the eyepiece adapters

                                                   Dave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave. I gues at a push if one wanted too then trimming an inch off the actual tube of the scope would overcome this if required. I'll see if my Omni 2x Barlow when attached into my 2" dielectric diagonal suffers the same issue when I get my focuser. I may just be able to squeeze it in this month after all, but need to do the number crunching still before I know for sure.  Thanks for the pics. :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By deanchapman2705
      Hi,
      I'm relatively new to the whole telescope thing but have done my research and was fixed on getting the Orion skyquest XT8i or XT10i. By spending that much money, I didn't like the idea of purchasing it online from their website without seeing it in person (and not having the reassurance of being able to take it back) and looked for stores in the UK that would supply them. After plenty of research, it seems like they don't exist anymore and they are only in the US? Is this right or could anyone help me?
      (I've looked at the Sky-watcher 250PX/200PX flextube skyscan goto but it is significantly heavier and the noise of the goto mechanism sounds like a table saw so that's put me off of it...)
      Any help would be much appreciated,
      Thanks
    • By AstroMuni
      In my own journey while learning this process and seeing similar areas of confusion among others, I decided to compile this FAQ.
      This FAQ has been put together using a combination of information from SkyWatcher manuals, my own experience and suggestions by various contributors on the forums. As most of the confusion is around the newer reticle, this FAQ deals with this in detail.
      Q: What is Polar alignment and why is it needed?
      A: Polar alignment refers to the act of aligning the Polar axis of an Equatorial mount telescope, so that it is parallel with the axis that the Earth revolves around. It makes the job of following objects across the sky much easier.
      Its of minor benefit to the visual astronomer but a necessity to the astrophotographer who is trying to take images of the night sky. Once a telescope is polar aligned and an object centred in the eyepiece, then assuming an RA motor is attached to the telescope, the object will stay centred. The better the polar alignment, the longer it will stay there.
      If no motor is attached then simply nudging the telescope around one axis will bring the object back to the centre of the eyepiece again.
       
      Q: Do I need to accurately do a Polar alignment?
      A: If you are a visual astronomer then its not that critical and you should be able to manage just doing a simple polar alignment by positioning the mount so that Polaris is in the centre of the reticle.
      But if you are doing astrophotography with long exposures then accurate polar alignment becomes critical to improve the quality of the images.
       
      Q: My reticle looks different to what is shown in the manual.
      A: There are 2 versions of this – the older one which has a bubble showing the location of Polaris Fig.1 and the newer one which has a clock face Fig.2.

      Figure 1
       

      Figure 2
       
      Q: How do I Polar align with the new Reticle?
      A: As Polaris is not located exactly at the North Celestial Pole (NCP), we can see it orbit the North Celestial Pole in a polar scope. The large circle seen in the centre of the pattern in Fig.2 is a representation of the Polaris’ orbit around the North Celestial Pole. When performing the polar alignment process, it is necessary to determine the orientation of the Polaris on the circle. The reticle is marked like a clock face with 0 at the top. Imagine this is the 12 position in a traditional clock.
      At the end of the initialization of the SynScan hand control, after entering the proper local longitude, latitude, date, time, and daylight-saving time, the SynScan hand controller will display the message: “Polaris Position in P.Scope=HH:MM”. Imagine the larger circle in Fig.2 as a clock’s face with 12:00 at the top, with the current time pointing to the “HH:MM”. The orientation of the hour hand of the clock represents the orientation of Polaris in the polar scope. Put the Polaris to the same orientation on the large circle to finish the polar alignment.
      In case you don’t use the Synscan hand controller, there are several apps available on Android and IOS which give you the position of Polaris on the clock face (such as SynscanInit for Android and Polar Scope Align for IOS). Skwatcher has their own app as well called Synscan Pro which shows the position of Polaris in the new reticle.
      The Polaris position also changes as time passes. The reticle displays 3 circles to represent Polaris’s orbit in the year 2012, 2020 and 2028. It also gives sub-dials at 0, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock position for year 2016, 2024 and 2032. An engraving labeled with the above years is also displayed on the right of the FOV for memo purpose. When doing polar alignment in the Northern hemisphere, the user should put Polaris on the correct circle corresponding to the present year for better alignment precision.
      This reticle is also covered in the SW EQ6-R manual.
       
      Q: When I position my mount in the Home position with the counterweight at its lowest point, the 0 mark on the reticle is not at the top. Is this a fault and how can I fix it?
      A: There is nothing wrong with your mount You just need to rotate the mount in the RA axis till the 0 is at its highest position. Now lock the RA axis and continue with the alignment process.
       
      Q: How can I ensure that the 0 is accurately positioned at the very top?
      A: 1) Firstly, level the mount and set it up pointing north as if making it ready for polar alignment.
      2) Next use the Alt and Az bolts to centre Polaris in the reticle - i.e. put Polaris right in the centre of the cross-hairs, not on any circle. Be as accurate as you can. 
      3) Now using ONLY the Alt bolts, move Polaris vertically upward in the reticle from its central position until it reaches any of the circles.
      4) Because you started with Polaris dead centre and moved it only vertically, Polaris is now exactly in the zero (12 o’clock) position on the circle. Now rotate the RA axis to put the reticle zero mark in exactly the same position as Polaris. Again, be as accurate as you can.
      5) Lock the RA axis in this position and using a marker pen put alignment marks on the mount housing so that you can find this position again without the need to use Polaris.
      [Courtesy Jif001 on SGL]
       
      Q: How do I Polar align with the older reticle?
      A: Here is a good article http://www.astro-baby.com/astrobaby/help/polar-aligning-the-skywatcher-heq5orion-sirius-mount/
       
      Q: How can I check if my polarscope reticle is aligned with the RA axis of the mount?
      A: Before using the polar scope for polar alignment, the polar scope itself must be calibrated to ensure the pattern in the polar scope is aligned to the mount’s R.A. axis. The following steps will outline how to calibrate the polar scope:
      This process is best done during daytime. Choose a fixed object (eg. a faraway object such as the tip of a TV antenna). Centre the reticle on the object by adjusting the two azimuth adjustment knobs and the two elevation adjustment bolts. Rotate the mount in R.A. axis for half a turn (180 degrees). Tighten the R.A. clutch after the rotation. If the object remains at the centre of the reticle in the polar scope after the rotation, then it means the polar scope has been aligned to the R.A. axis and no calibration is needed. If its not aligned, read this article which explains how to recalibrate https://www.myastroscience.com/polarscopecalibration There are also videos on YouTube that explain this process.
      Hope this helps. 🙂
      Do let me know if you have other questions (and answers) and I can add to this.
       
    • By NallyFace
      Hello,
      Is anyone on here signed up for the SkySafari and SynScan beta testing to natively support IOS? If so how has it been going?
      https://support.simulationcurriculum.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360043282514-Beta-Testing-SkySafari-6-iOS-Only-SynScan-WiFi-Read-This-To-Participate-?page=2#community_comment_360012192693
      Its 2020.
       
       
    • By GavinC
      I thought the recent email exchange between Skywatcher support and myself might be of interest, as there appears little information available on this feature.
      ===========================================
      Hi Gavin,
      Regarding "Alignment Sharing", please see the description below.
      ## Alignment Sharing
      Alignment data is stored in each individual app instance. This means if you performed alignment using one app instance, only it will have the newly created alignment data. If another app instance connects to the same mount, it will not have access to the new alignment data.
      The alignment sharing feature (**Utility > Alignment Sharing**) allows one app instance to send a copy of alignment data to another app instance. For it to work, the devices running the app instances must be on the same local area network (eg connect to the same Wi-Fi network). The sending instance turns on **Share my alignment**, while the receiving instance turns off this option. The receiving instance should then see the shared alignment data appear in a list. Loading alignment data overwrites the previous alignment data.

      You can use the Alignment Sharing to transfer the alignment data to another device after completing a Star Alignment. For example, you have done and successfully complete 2-Star alignment with your smartphone and then you can use the Alignment Sharing function to share the alignment data to the SynScan Pro App Windows program which is running on your PC. Then you don't have to do the alignment again to control the same AZ GOTO mount with the Windows SynScan App because it has the same alignment result as your smartphone has.
      If you have any questions, please feel free to let us know.
      Thank you.
      SynScan App Team

      On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 1:22 AM Gavin Cox wrote:
      Hello,
      I have just seen you have updated the Synscan app firmware to 1.19.  I have this installed on a Win PC and Android phone and use it to control a AZ GOTO mount running the latest firmware using the Synscan Wifi Dongle.
      There looks to be some new functionality under the utility menu called 'alignment sharing', but I can't find any documentation in the help files on this?
      Please can you detail how it can be used?  If both my phone and PC are connected to the SynScan WiFi hotspot and I perform an alignment on my phone will the app on the PC recognise this too (or vice versa)?
      Thank you,
      Gavin
    • By Batesy82
      Hi guys,
      I've literally just signed up so I'm totally new here and excited to learn from all you professional astromaster... 
      I'm not sure if this is the right place to post so I do apologise if not... 
      I'm after a skywatcher eq3 pro goto mount for my celestron astromaster 130eq every website i go on they are out of stock and not available for a couple of months 🙄 does anybody know a stockist that has these in stock? I've only been in the astrophotography hobby 4 weeks so I've got lots to learn... 
       
      Thank you for your help 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.