Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

MikeODay

Alnitak and the Flame and Horsehead Nebulae

Recommended Posts

Alnitak and the Flame and Horsehead Nebulae ( by Mike O'Day - https://500px.com/mikeoday )

I struggled to try to significantly reduce the quite apparent noise without losing too much detail in the clouds. In the end I decided to keep the detail ( and the noise ).

Details:

Orion's Belt - centred on "Alnitak".

A 1.7 magnitute tripple star at one end of the belt.

Includes the Flame Nebula (NGC2024) and IC434 which contains the Horsehead Nebula.

RA 16h 41m 42s, Dec -48deg 48' 46".

Approx. 3800 light years away.

Skywatcher Quattro 10" f4 Newtonian.

Skywatcher AZ Eq6 GT Mount (on concrete pier).

Orion 80mm f5 guide scope and auto guider - PHD2.

Baader MPCC Mark 3 Coma Corrector, no filter.

Nikon D5300 (unmodified).

Field of view (deg) ~ 1.35 x 0.90.

300 subs in total.

63 x 10 sec ISO100.

38 x 20 sec ISO200 .

21 X 20 sec ISO800.

165 x 30 sec ISO800.

13 x 60 sec ISO800.

(14bit NEF, Long Exp. NR on).

Pixinsight and photoshop.

18th December 2015.

source:

http://photo.net/photos/MikeODay

https://500px.com/mikeoday

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent shots, that area around Alnitak is one of my favorites, the Pleiades as well. I see the reflection nebulosity there at times, very beautiful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noise or no noise, still a great looking image... especially for a unmdded DSLR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noise where, I think this is stunning photo which shows the whole area very well indeed, it is also very useful to me as I am on a quest to find this difficult IC 434 and now at least I know I am in the right area, great shot.

Alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you guys for your very kind words - they are much appreciated.

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it looks awesome! Struggling with this one myself at the moment.

Good call on keeping the noise with the detail, I think that looks a lot better than too heavy noise reduction.

Two questions:

1. Why long exp. NR on? The stacking should handle the noise, especially if you use dithering with PHD2.

2. Why no longer subs than 60 secs since you are guiding? LP? Given your result with these short subs I think you will have a killer image with some more time on it. At least do 50-100 of those 60 sec. ones.

Again, great photo!

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it looks awesome! Struggling with this one myself at the moment.

Good call on keeping the noise with the detail, I think that looks a lot better than too heavy noise reduction.

Two questions:

1. Why long exp. NR on? The stacking should handle the noise, especially if you use dithering with PHD2.

I presume that by using it and applying a custom dark to each image, the problem of matching a dark to all those different exposure times and ISO ratings is avoided?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume that by using it and applying a custom dark to each image, the problem of matching a dark to all those different exposure times and ISO ratings is avoided?

Yes, but since it is done when taking the photos it takes twice the time! At least here in Sweden clear nights are very rare so imaging time is precious [emoji4]

Darks can be a task for cloudy nights [emoji4]

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it looks awesome! Struggling with this one myself at the moment.

Good call on keeping the noise with the detail, I think that looks a lot better than too heavy noise reduction.

Two questions:

1. Why long exp. NR on? The stacking should handle the noise, especially if you use dithering with PHD2.

2. Why no longer subs than 60 secs since you are guiding? LP? Given your result with these short subs I think you will have a killer image with some more time on it. At least do 50-100 of those 60 sec. ones.

Again, great photo!

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

Thanks Martin.

1. I had difficulty previously when using 'dark';I ended up with small streaks that looked like rain. I understand that dithering might solve this but I cannot get it to work. Anyway, my images greatly improved when I started using in camera dark subtraction.

2. When not using a filter, 30 sec subs @ 800iso with my f4 Newtonian produce a histogram that peaks about 20% from the left and leaves clear gap of about 10% at the far left. I'm still experimenting but at the moment I am not sure I gain much by increasing the exposure any more given that the skies have not been too dark lately ( ie. high humidity raising LP ).

Also, I lose about 10% of my 30 sec subs due to tracking errors, aircraft lights, satellites, meteors, etc. Longer subs would mean fewer good subs.

With regard to 'more time'; I'm still confused about that. Intuitively I want to agree but I read somewhere that the sub length is not important. The SNR is the same from say 50x60sec and 100x30sec - that is, it is only the total time that matters. Anyway, still experimenting and judging by results.

All the best

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firefowx won't let me look - Flickr's security certificate has expired...

Here is a direct upload - quality is probably poor though; the uploader is reporting a file size that is 1/10 of that of the original (I presume the system is recompressing the JPEG with quality set to "poor").

Edit: yep, I was right; it looks terrible loaded directly...

post-36360-0-50241700-1450610076_thumb.j

Edited by mike005
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume that by using it and applying a custom dark to each image, the problem of matching a dark to all those different exposure times and ISO ratings is avoided?

Yes, but since it is done when taking the photos it takes twice the time! At least here in Sweden clear nights are very rare so imaging time is precious [emoji4]

Darks can be a task for cloudy nights [emoji4]

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

For me it comes down to the quality of the final result - in camera dark frame subtraction seems to produces better results for me than using "darks". Could it be a temperature related factor? In camera processing uses a dark frame taken under the exact same conditions as the original, whereas post processing using a library of darks is at best only an approximation of the actual conditions. On the other hand I could be talking rubbish :). After all I have only been at this for a little over a year and I still have a great deal to learn.

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice set of images, especially the HH.

Cheers, much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With regard to 'more time'; I'm still confused about that. Intuitively I want to agree but I read somewhere that the sub length is not important. The SNR is the same from say 50x60sec and 100x30sec - that is, it is only the total time that matters. Anyway, still experimenting and judging by results.

With more time I meant not only longer subs but at least more of your longer ones. If you have a lot of subs and stack using sigma rejection all airplane trails etc will dissappear.

Regarding the total integration time being the only thing that matters it might be true to a degree but it's not going to work if the subs are too short. I've tried with 300 1-second subs and a single 60-second sub blows them out of the water [emoji4]

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With more time I meant not only longer subs but at least more of your longer ones. If you have a lot of subs and stack using sigma rejection all airplane trails etc will dissappear.

Regarding the total integration time being the only thing that matters it might be true to a degree but it's not going to work if the subs are too short. I've tried with 300 1-second subs and a single 60-second sub blows them out of the water [emoji4]

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

Thanks Martin, I'm stuck with the moon now for the next 10 days or so but I'll have a go at trying to grab some more longer subs when it departs.

By the way, do you have a rule of thumb for setting one shot DSLR exposure in light polluted skies? I've been aiming for a LP histogram peak of no more than 30% from the left (that would be about 60 sec @ iso 800 with the LP we have been experiencing recently due to high humidity).

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although my skies really aren't that light pollluted. I can do 10 minutes at ISO800 and f/4 on a good day [emoji4]

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Martin, I will try pushing it that far and see how it goes.

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Spacecake2
      Today at 3am (Australia) I woke up and I tried to observe the Orion nebula. It was pretty hard to image it since I don't have a camera adapter and a had 4 second exposures. But after 20 tries I finally got non-wobbly image. The camera could see more than my own eyes! 
      (I live in bortle 7) ☹️

    • By AstroRuz
      For sale is my beloved but now superfluous to requirements HEQ5 Pro for £700
      It's in a used condition as you would imagine. I've had it for about 4 years and found great success with this mount. Ideal for those beginning astrophotography and also good for visual users.
      I'm calling it "deluxe" due to the upgrades I've had done.
      - It's belt modified
      - It's had brand new bearings and grease
      - The backlash has been expertly setup 
      - It has the latest polar scope
      - The power port has been replaced with an aviation style port which is a lot more secure
      It'll come with the hand controller and at least 1 counterweight (if I can find the second it'll come with both). The polar scope cover has been lost. The counterweight is rusty as always. There is some marring on the counterweight bar housing as shown in the photos.
      It also will come with the modified power cable required also.
      Note: the power LED sometimes doesn't illuminate but the mount is still powered (please see the photo with the hand controller).
      Collection or local delivery within Northampton







    • By Spacecake2
      Hello,
      I know you've seen these questions a lot (unless your new) but I'm struggling a lot on if I should buy a Skywatcher 250px (10") or 200px (8") (dobsonians). I have a 5 inch and i'm looking for a big step up for noticeable changes. 
      Thank you 
       
    • By Hoopla
      Hi All,
      im totally new to this and have been getting setup over the past 3 months. I’ve purchased a Skywatcher 150P on a EQ3 Pro mount. 
       
      I have a 2x and 3x Barlow with 10x and 20x eyepieces. I’m trying to view and photograph Mars as it’s so bright at present and easy to see however I’m really struggling to see anything more than a bright ball when viewing and when photographing it’s just a blurry ball. 
       
      I have a canon 700d DSLR with t ring and adaptors  
      can folk suggest what combination of Barlow / eyepiece would be required to view Mars in all its glory and possibly lens and iso/exposure settings to get some nice shots too please. I’m aware I may need to stack and am tech savvy so this bit should be ok. I just can’t seem to get anything at present to process.
      help!! 
    • By Astrid
      My 200P just arrived and oh my God... I have been trying to wrap my head around the mount for 4 hours.
      The manual didn't really help so I decided to go on youtube, but again, I didn't find any good and detailed videos so I decided to ask here if there is any video or perhaps blog post that might help me set up the mount. 
      Thank you very much! 
      *by the way, is the EQ5 supposed to have slow motion cables? I only got 2 knobs (not cables) and I'm not sure if there is something missing or not... sorry, this is the first time I've used a serious equatorial mount or telescope. 
      Thank you very much!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.