Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

MikeODay

Alnitak and the Flame and Horsehead Nebulae

Recommended Posts

Alnitak and the Flame and Horsehead Nebulae ( by Mike O'Day - https://500px.com/mikeoday )

I struggled to try to significantly reduce the quite apparent noise without losing too much detail in the clouds. In the end I decided to keep the detail ( and the noise ).

Details:

Orion's Belt - centred on "Alnitak".

A 1.7 magnitute tripple star at one end of the belt.

Includes the Flame Nebula (NGC2024) and IC434 which contains the Horsehead Nebula.

RA 16h 41m 42s, Dec -48deg 48' 46".

Approx. 3800 light years away.

Skywatcher Quattro 10" f4 Newtonian.

Skywatcher AZ Eq6 GT Mount (on concrete pier).

Orion 80mm f5 guide scope and auto guider - PHD2.

Baader MPCC Mark 3 Coma Corrector, no filter.

Nikon D5300 (unmodified).

Field of view (deg) ~ 1.35 x 0.90.

300 subs in total.

63 x 10 sec ISO100.

38 x 20 sec ISO200 .

21 X 20 sec ISO800.

165 x 30 sec ISO800.

13 x 60 sec ISO800.

(14bit NEF, Long Exp. NR on).

Pixinsight and photoshop.

18th December 2015.

source:

http://photo.net/photos/MikeODay

https://500px.com/mikeoday

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent shots, that area around Alnitak is one of my favorites, the Pleiades as well. I see the reflection nebulosity there at times, very beautiful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noise or no noise, still a great looking image... especially for a unmdded DSLR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noise where, I think this is stunning photo which shows the whole area very well indeed, it is also very useful to me as I am on a quest to find this difficult IC 434 and now at least I know I am in the right area, great shot.

Alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you guys for your very kind words - they are much appreciated.

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it looks awesome! Struggling with this one myself at the moment.

Good call on keeping the noise with the detail, I think that looks a lot better than too heavy noise reduction.

Two questions:

1. Why long exp. NR on? The stacking should handle the noise, especially if you use dithering with PHD2.

2. Why no longer subs than 60 secs since you are guiding? LP? Given your result with these short subs I think you will have a killer image with some more time on it. At least do 50-100 of those 60 sec. ones.

Again, great photo!

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it looks awesome! Struggling with this one myself at the moment.

Good call on keeping the noise with the detail, I think that looks a lot better than too heavy noise reduction.

Two questions:

1. Why long exp. NR on? The stacking should handle the noise, especially if you use dithering with PHD2.

I presume that by using it and applying a custom dark to each image, the problem of matching a dark to all those different exposure times and ISO ratings is avoided?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume that by using it and applying a custom dark to each image, the problem of matching a dark to all those different exposure times and ISO ratings is avoided?

Yes, but since it is done when taking the photos it takes twice the time! At least here in Sweden clear nights are very rare so imaging time is precious [emoji4]

Darks can be a task for cloudy nights [emoji4]

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it looks awesome! Struggling with this one myself at the moment.

Good call on keeping the noise with the detail, I think that looks a lot better than too heavy noise reduction.

Two questions:

1. Why long exp. NR on? The stacking should handle the noise, especially if you use dithering with PHD2.

2. Why no longer subs than 60 secs since you are guiding? LP? Given your result with these short subs I think you will have a killer image with some more time on it. At least do 50-100 of those 60 sec. ones.

Again, great photo!

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

Thanks Martin.

1. I had difficulty previously when using 'dark';I ended up with small streaks that looked like rain. I understand that dithering might solve this but I cannot get it to work. Anyway, my images greatly improved when I started using in camera dark subtraction.

2. When not using a filter, 30 sec subs @ 800iso with my f4 Newtonian produce a histogram that peaks about 20% from the left and leaves clear gap of about 10% at the far left. I'm still experimenting but at the moment I am not sure I gain much by increasing the exposure any more given that the skies have not been too dark lately ( ie. high humidity raising LP ).

Also, I lose about 10% of my 30 sec subs due to tracking errors, aircraft lights, satellites, meteors, etc. Longer subs would mean fewer good subs.

With regard to 'more time'; I'm still confused about that. Intuitively I want to agree but I read somewhere that the sub length is not important. The SNR is the same from say 50x60sec and 100x30sec - that is, it is only the total time that matters. Anyway, still experimenting and judging by results.

All the best

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firefowx won't let me look - Flickr's security certificate has expired...

Here is a direct upload - quality is probably poor though; the uploader is reporting a file size that is 1/10 of that of the original (I presume the system is recompressing the JPEG with quality set to "poor").

Edit: yep, I was right; it looks terrible loaded directly...

post-36360-0-50241700-1450610076_thumb.j

Edited by mike005
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume that by using it and applying a custom dark to each image, the problem of matching a dark to all those different exposure times and ISO ratings is avoided?

Yes, but since it is done when taking the photos it takes twice the time! At least here in Sweden clear nights are very rare so imaging time is precious [emoji4]

Darks can be a task for cloudy nights [emoji4]

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

For me it comes down to the quality of the final result - in camera dark frame subtraction seems to produces better results for me than using "darks". Could it be a temperature related factor? In camera processing uses a dark frame taken under the exact same conditions as the original, whereas post processing using a library of darks is at best only an approximation of the actual conditions. On the other hand I could be talking rubbish :). After all I have only been at this for a little over a year and I still have a great deal to learn.

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice set of images, especially the HH.

Cheers, much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With regard to 'more time'; I'm still confused about that. Intuitively I want to agree but I read somewhere that the sub length is not important. The SNR is the same from say 50x60sec and 100x30sec - that is, it is only the total time that matters. Anyway, still experimenting and judging by results.

With more time I meant not only longer subs but at least more of your longer ones. If you have a lot of subs and stack using sigma rejection all airplane trails etc will dissappear.

Regarding the total integration time being the only thing that matters it might be true to a degree but it's not going to work if the subs are too short. I've tried with 300 1-second subs and a single 60-second sub blows them out of the water [emoji4]

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With more time I meant not only longer subs but at least more of your longer ones. If you have a lot of subs and stack using sigma rejection all airplane trails etc will dissappear.

Regarding the total integration time being the only thing that matters it might be true to a degree but it's not going to work if the subs are too short. I've tried with 300 1-second subs and a single 60-second sub blows them out of the water [emoji4]

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

Thanks Martin, I'm stuck with the moon now for the next 10 days or so but I'll have a go at trying to grab some more longer subs when it departs.

By the way, do you have a rule of thumb for setting one shot DSLR exposure in light polluted skies? I've been aiming for a LP histogram peak of no more than 30% from the left (that would be about 60 sec @ iso 800 with the LP we have been experiencing recently due to high humidity).

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although my skies really aren't that light pollluted. I can do 10 minutes at ISO800 and f/4 on a good day [emoji4]

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Martin, I will try pushing it that far and see how it goes.

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MattsGazingAgain
      Hi,
      I'm matt from the UK, essex to be more accurate. I had a skywatcher 150p around 8 years ago and had some amazing moments with it, Jupiter being one of the highlights despite the 150p's declination towards DSO's. Unfortunately due to some financial problems at the time I had to sell it. Astronomy was a hobby I locked away to a quiet corner of my brain until my very wise other half helped me realise how much I missed it. 
      We have just bought a skywatcher 150pds as i want to focus on astrophotography this time. Its currently on a eq3 pro mount with synscan. Not the ideal mount, i plan to upgrade to the heq5 as soon as possible, but its perfect for me to learn and practise on. 
      We bought the scope and mount second hand in an amazing deal, coming with the coma corrector, all 3 sky panorama uwa lenses, the canon t ring adaptors and a clubman flight case for £700. Everything in perfect condition, although the mount has some stickiness and i think maybe some binding in the gears, so I plan to strip it down, de and regrease and reassemble as soon as possible.
      Have only had the opportunity for a couple of hours viewing so far, during which I very unsuccessfully attempted to polar align and then 2 star align the mount, but loved seeing it slew. I did get some amazing manual visual observation on the moon, but was surprised that despite my previous experience with a very similar scope just how much I don't know. Am very eager to learn as much as I can and am very excited to be back in the hobby, as you can probably tell from my extracted and probably boring welcome message.
      Anyone with any experience of this scope or mount with any tips or little known tweaks I would be exceptionally grateful for any advice. Or any tips in regards to polar aligning and star aligning, especially in a class 6 bortle or similar. 
      One problem I struggled with was gaining any focus on any lens I have while using the barlow lens. Am sure it is either my error or cheap equipment but I gained a very nice focus with the 28mm supplied lens and the panorama range but struggled gaining focus with the barlow and said lenses.  After looking into this though I'm wondering if it was due to me not accounting for eye relief?
      I look forward to meeting like minded people on this forum.
       
      Many regards
      Matt
       
       
       
    • By JodieH
      Hey everyone 
      I have a Celestron Starsense Explorer DX 102AZ on the way. 
      https://www.celestron.com/products/starsense-explorer-dx-102az
      660mm
      F6.5
      I was wondering if someone could please recommend which size EP to buy for viewing planets and the moon? 
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/skywatcher-eyepieces/skywatcher-uwa-planetary-eyepieces.html#faq
      Sky watcher ULA Planetary (my budget is £40)
      I've read on another thread that sometimes 9mm can outperform a 4mm with a fast telescope as more magnification can make the viewing duller? I was hoping for the best magnification that is also crisp. 
      Thank you for your help. 
    • By Cedric Schweizer
      Hello community,
      Does anyone know if I can use a Skywatcher Explorer 130pds with a Sony alpha a7iii? I'm quite new to AP... I know that I need a T-Adapter but I'm a little concerned about the potential vignetting I could get...
      Thanks a lot for the help!
      Cédric
       
       
    • By Naveen
      Hi all - looking for some
      advice on eyepieces. I have seen beautiful views of Jupiter with its moons and Saturn and of course the moon. I have two extra 32mm and 10mm plossls but am looking for better lenses for planets which will show more detail? Which ones would you suggest? Many thanks in advance!
    • By Starbuddypal
      I'm trying to get a photo of Jupiter and Saturn with my Nikon D3000 DSLR but I can't get anything clear. I attached the kind of photos I'm getting with my camera. They end up being too bright and no distinguishable features show up. Is it even possible for my Nikon to get photos of planetary objects like Saturn and Jupiter?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.