Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Gino Arcari

Picked up a SW Mak 180 today!!

Recommended Posts

I was checking on astrobuysell website last night and I seen a Mak 180 for sale close to me so I decided that it will be my xmas present and went to pick it up tonight! I didnt expect it to be so big! I already have a mak 127 and loved it so its exciting to see what the 180 will be like. Does anyone have any pictures of the planets that theyve imaged? Im excited to see what the views are like but I probably wont have a chance to take it outside any time soon because of this weather! thanks in advance!

post-30010-0-97682800-1449443092_thumb.j

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be very interested to hear your impressions of this scope if it ever stops raining! I've toyed with the idea of getting one myself :)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be very interested to hear your impressions of this scope if it ever stops raining! I've toyed with the idea of getting one myself :)

Hi Tim! I've been thinking about it for a while too and only went for it when I seen an ad for a 2nd hand one close by.

I'll be sure to say what I think of it once I've got a proper chance to use it! 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good scope, you will need a dew shield for it

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a lovely pair. Are you going to dual-mount them?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I will probably make a dew shield too, I also need a 2" dust cap to fit onto the scope because the previous owner lost it. No I won't be dual mounting it, I will be putting the 127 up for sale sometime this week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a friend who has a 180 Mak. It's great for the Moon and planets. I am sure you will love it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely looking scope I,m sure you will be very happy with it,I guess this perma cloud will last longer now.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for replies! yes this bad weather will probably last a bit longer now ;-) Im in the market for a new eyepiece now and maybe a dielectric diagonal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a great choice, including for solar observing and imaging (with Baader film). I've had some great views with a binoviewer at 180x.

 

Does anyone have any pictures of the planets that theyve imaged?

 

Sure thing:

 

get.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a great choice, including for solar observing and imaging (with Baader film). I've had some great views with a binoviewer at 180x.

Sure thing:

get.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpgget.jpg

WOW those animations are breathtaking! I was thinking about getting a pair of William optics and a William optics dielectric diagonal what do you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see a reason not to :) Though I just used a regular 2" GSO diagonal, worked just fine (had to be collimated though by placing some shims under mirror's corner). For imaging consider adding an external focuser - mirror shift isn't big, but it's there. I had a Baader Steeltrack (SCT version with adapter).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Baader Maxbright binoviewer and a pair of cheap 25 mm Plössls, also a 1.7x Glass Path Correct (i.e. a dedicated Barlow). I don't use the bino often, so I haven't got around to buying another pair of eyepieces yet (I'm thinking of 15-18 mm orthos or premium Plössls).

External focuser example: http://agenaastro.com/gso-sct-dual-speed-crayford-focuser-schmidt-cassegrain-telescope.html

(for this one you'd also need an SCT-Mak back thread adapter). The way it works is you first set coarse focus with the Mak's (or SCT's) focusing knob, then fine-focus using the external focuser. It's not that important for visual, but when imaging with a small sensor (e.g. 1/3" in my PGR Chameleon), the slight mirror shift caused by the main focusing knob's action can move the picture almost out of the camera's field of view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By alex_stars
      Dear Stargazers,
      I have been searching for a new visual back for my 180 SkyMax Mak-Cass, especially with micro-focusing ability. My 180 Mak has a standard 2" SC thread on the back so the obvious choice would be a Crayford style aftermarket focuser with 1:10 micro-focusing. However I did not like the idea to add about 750 g of focusing equipment to my telescope when my heaviest "payload" is 522g, thats visual with a 1.25" diagonal, an ADC and the Hyerflex zoom EP.
      So I was thinking a bit and came up with the following setup, both for visual as well as planetary photography. Here is the shopping list:
      2" SC to T2 rotatable adapter (there is a Baader one, I went for the TS TSSC-T2S adapter) 2x T2 - Baader 1.25" focusing EP holder (T-2 part #08A or #2458125) a 40 mm T2 extension or an ADC with T2 treads (I have both) a micro-focusing diagonal (I converted my TS 1.25" diagonal with one of the two Baader #08A EP holders and this TS ZS1D-T2 adapter) Now first some images of the 1.25" diagonal conversion:

      off goes the standard EP holder and mount the T2 adapter:

      and on goes the Baader #08A EP focusing holders

      well that was straightforward, but it's nice to focus the EP directly on the diagonal.
      Onward with the new configuration. I removed the standard visual back and the 2" to 1.25" adapter I used to use:


      and mounted the SC to T2, the 40mm T2 extension and the Baader #08A EP holder. This setup is about 100g lighter than the original VB. It places a camera at FL = 2477 mm and one can directly micro-focus the camera.
      Another setup is with an ADC:

      where this setup is about 70g lighter than the original VB and places the camera at FL = 2400 mm. Again micro-focusing is achieved with the Baader #08A EP holder.
      Now when it comes to observing planets, an ADC is quite crucial in the next few years to come so I mounted it as seen above. You can level the ADC with the SC to T2 adapter, which is rotatable, but you can also easily lock it in place by tightening the outer ring with the grooves. Add the now focusing diagonal and your favourite EP and:

      You are ready to observe at an FL = 2730 mm (almost stock FL). The advantage is that you can easily rotate the diagonal with the first Baader #08A EP holder (before the diagonal in the light path) and then focus your EP with the second Baader #08A at the diagonal. 😀
      I like this setup, both because it is very lightweight and also versatile. Downside is that you can not add a motor focuser, which I don't mind. I will test this setup extensively now during October (Mars!!) and report back on how it performs when using it out at night.
      Let me know what you think about the setup. Hope its useful to anyone.
      Clear Skies,
      Alex
    • By alex_stars
      Hi All,
      I thought I report on an issue I recently faced with my Celestron AVX mount that features the new dual saddle plate. The plate takes two standards of dovetails, the narrow CG-5 dovetails and wider CGE. Most people know the CG-5 as a "Vixen Style" dovetail and the CGE is Celestron's version of a 3" (but not compatible with a Losmandy) dovetail.
      Now the issue. I own a 7" Mak (Skymax 180 from SW) which has a classical Vixen-Style dovetail. When you try to clamp the 7" Mak to the AVX, the saddle plate clamp does not really fit.  Interestingly the 7" Mak has too large of a diameter to fit the AVX saddle, which comes to a surprise, given that a C8 or a C9.25 are popular choices for that mount.
       
      As you can see on image, on the left side, the clamp rests on the OTA and the dovetail does not touch the clamp on the bottom. When you tighten the fixing screws, tension is built up between the clamp and the OTA and not between the clamp and the dovetail. In addition this makes it quite harder to balance the OTA on the mount (the clamp-tube jams). In the end the OTA will get a dent at that location, I guess. Luckily I caught this right a way and my OTA is not yet damaged.
      Anyhow for some this might not be an issue, but I changed the AVX clamp and now use an aftermarket clamp from ADM.
      Thought I share this with the community as this might be interesting for some.
      Clear skies
      Alex
    • By R26 oldtimer
      Well, not all just the sw ed80 and ed120.
      I have acquired a taste lately for flat fields and round stars edge to edge. I've never bothered with ff/fr so far, I'd rather spend the money on an extra scope, but I feel I can justify one. But which one, as I would like to improve both my scopes. So it boils down to this: has anyone used either the dedicated sw ff/fr for the ed80 with the Ed120 or the ff/FR for the Ed120 with the  ed80 and got good results? And when I say good, I don't mean great (as with the dedicated one), just better than using the scope with out one.
      If so, which ff/FR did you use to match one scope and slightly improve the other, the ff/fr for the ed80 or the ed120? Perhaps a third party one? (but not too expensive, because it would beat the purpose of buying both the dedicated ones). Something like that: https://www.firstlightoptics.com/stellamira-telescopes/stellamira-2-0-8x-reducer-field-flattener-with-m48-adapter.html ??
      P. S. I am using a Canon 600d dslr
    • By crossingsymmetry
      Greetings everyone.
      I recently scored a great deal on facebook marketplace and bought Skywatcher Skymax 180 mm Maksutov-Cassegrain Telescope (f/15) with EQ6R-pro mount. I understand that long focal length telescopes are more suitable for planetary imaging. However, as I am tight on budget, I would like to use the same scope for deep-sky astrophotography. I have Canon Rebel T5 DSLR camera that I am using for taking images. Without autoguiding and a decent polar alignment, I can get ~30 seconds long shots without any star trailing, but that's not sufficient for imaging objects like M51. I would like to be able to integrate longer, say few minutes, thus would like to purchase an autoguider.  Here are some specific questions I have.
      1). The telescope comes with an 8 x 50 straight-through finder.  If I were to use it as a guidescope, what type of image integration time can I expect? Has anyone done autoguiding for f/15 scope with an 8x50 or other finderscopes?
      2). If the integration time will be an issue with the 8x50 finder scope, I am open to purchasing an off-axis-guider. However, considering the narrow field-of-view of Mak-180 telescope, I am concerned about not having enough photons from guidestar for autoguiding. For instance, with my DSLR camera, I need to integrate 20-30 seconds to see the nearby stars in M51. What type of OAG and camera would I need to autoguide with my scope? Are there affordable cameras (~$200) that would do the job for me? Would ASI120MM Mini Monochrome (~$150) do the job? What about OAG?
      I plan to use phd2 software for autoguiding rather than relying on the build-in guide port on the mount.  Instead of integrating for hours, I am planning to do DSS stacking of few mintues long multiple shots, hopefully this will put less strict requirements on the autoguider.
      In case this information is relevant: with my current setup, I have no issue pointing my scope to a desired deep-sky object, track the object within the field-of-view of my DSLR camera for hours using the mechnical tracking of the EQ6 mount. For instance following is a single raw image of Ring nebula taken with 30 seconds shot.  But it is not enough for generating high-quality images. 

       
      Thank you in advance for your help.
       
      Regards,
      Jay
       
    • By Bruno Marin
      I found this setup in internet and make me think, with AZEQ6 GT and 2 scopes, different weights and size, without counterweight in AZ mode! 
      - I can put a MAK100mm 3kg +- and a OO VX10l  12kg +- without counterweight?
       
      Does anyone have this setup mount and already used without counterweight with two telescopes of different weights? Is it really necessary to have a balance using in AZ mode?
      The problem to centralize the object with both scopes is true? With the SW AZEQ6 GT?
      Follow the images
      a TSA-120 with 6.5 kg i think and the other with 22kg i forgot the brand hehe you can help me?
       


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.