Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

MikeODay

The Jewel Box Cluster in the Crux Constellation ( NGC 4755 )

Recommended Posts

The Jewel Box ( NGC 4755 ) by Mike O'Day ( 500px.com/mikeoday )

This is a re-processed version of an old capture of mine taken last year when I was a two day old baby astrophotographer. Back then I was only just learing how to polar align my scope on its tripod and auto-guiding was a distant goal. This is a stack of 15 x 30sec images from my unmodified Nikon D300 ( I now use an unmodified D5300 as it is lighter and causes less flex in the focuser ).

Description:

The Jewel Box Cluster in the Crux Constellation ( NGC 4755 ) by Mike O'Day ( 500px.com/MikeODay )

Viewed through a telsecope, John Herschel described the Jewel Box Cluster as "a casket of varioulsy coloured precious stones" - hence the name. The Jewel Box, visible only from the Southern Hemisphere and appearing as a bright fuzzy star to the naked eye, is a cluster of around 100 ( mostly blue giant ) stars approximately 7000 light years from Earth.

Links:

500px.com/MikeODay

photo.net/photos/MikeODay

Details:

NGC 4755 - RA 12h 54.5m, Dec -60deg 26'.

Skywatcher Quattro 10" f4 Newtonian.

Skywatcher AZ Eq6 GT Mount.

Unguided.

Baader MPCC Mark 3 Coma Corrector.

Nikon D300 (unmodified).

Field of view (deg) ~ 1.35 x 0.90.

Combination of 15 images 30 sec @ ISO800.

Registax & Photoshop

24 April 2014 (re-processed Nov 2015)

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely shot of a great object. I have only ever seen it through fairly cheap 15x70 bins, but even then it is great.

Thanks Michael, much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another great image... You almost captured the look and feel of it through the eyepiece... I say almost because no photo beats the view of a number of objects through the eye piece... The jewel box being one of them... Awesome image tho....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another great image... You almost captured the look and feel of it through the eyepiece... I say almost because no photo beats the view of a number of objects through the eye piece... The jewel box being one of them... Awesome image tho....

Thanks for your kind words. Although I have take your word for how it looks through an eyepiece - soon after I set up my Newtonian scope I rotated the tube so that the focuser was on the underside ( when pointing at the pole ) to better balance the camera, etc. Since then I have not looked through an eyepiece due to the mostly awkward shapes and angles I would need to contort into in order to see down the eyepiece!

Cheers

Mike

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spectacular image. Always nice to see the jewels of the Southern sky.

Thanks, much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I often say that the hardest things to get right in deep sky imaging are the background sky and the stars. Here we have an object lesson in what they should look like, glittering, small, tight, colourful stars and a nicely judged neutral, matt background sky. Glossy backgrounds just look artificial.

This is one of the best cluster images I remember seeing.

Olly

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I often say that the hardest things to get right in deep sky imaging are the background sky and the stars. Here we have an object lesson in what they should look like, glittering, small, tight, colourful stars and a nicely judged neutral, matt background sky. Glossy backgrounds just look artificial.

This is one of the best cluster images I remember seeing.

Olly

Thank you very much for your kind words. The challenge you mention is one that I constantly struggle with. I am pleased that you think I got it right. Much appreciated.

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Ken Mitchell
      Hi all,
      For a long time I wanted to shoot this frame, probably from the early days of my astrophotography adventure.
      Finally after all these years I managed to get a decent result of the 'stuff' between these two beautiful nebulae. Fairly happy with the image but always looking for improvement.
      I hope one day to redo this all with a mono camera and filters. 
      Apart from NGC1499 , M45 and the Baby Eagle Nebula no idea what else is in the picture. If you happen to have an idea feel free to educate me.
       
      Some info on image and capturing:
      Widefield Pleiades to California.
      Taken over 2 nights with a total of 11hrs 25min integration.  
      With a stock Nikon d610 and Nikkor 85mm 1.8 objective.
      Tracking was done with the Skywatcher Star Adventurer.
      Lights and all calibrations frames were stacked in DSS.
      Processing was done in Adobe Photoshop CC using Adobe Raw, GradientXterminator plugin, HLVG plugin, Nik software plugins and Photokemi action set.
       
      Ken

       
    • By merlin100
      I'm tempted to go down the route of getting myself a brand new reflector...  My friend's old Meade 114/900 is a good telescope, but I want something of my own and with a bit more light gathering power.  To this end, I've been looking at a couple of different models and manufactures.  
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/beginner-telescopes/skywatcher-explorer-130.html
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/beginner-telescopes/skywatcher-explorer-130p.html
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/reflectors/skywatcher-explorer-130m.html
      https://www.amazon.co.uk/Meade-Instruments-Polaris-Reflector-Telescope/dp/B01FG8JEGG
      I must admit, the Skywatcher Explorer 130M floats my boat, as it's motorised with a speed controller.
      Any thoughts or observations?🤔
    • By stevebb
      Celestron C8 XLT + extras and SkyWatcher Star Travel 80 (ST80)
      I have a Celestron C8 with XLT Starbrite coatings. Will include the full length base plate, both visual and imaging backs, scope rings, front 8" end cap and the finder scope with it. No box I'm afraid. Optics are good and clean, focal length is huge - 2300mm from memory. This lot would cost close to £1300 new and one with less spec went for £750 on fleabay recently. Might be interested in a part exchange or will let it go for £450 collection only.
      Also, I have a SkyWatcher Star Traveler 80 - good optics, used as a guide scope - just the scope itself (does not include the barlow in the photo) - now including dovetail bar and scope rings looking at around £50 for it.
      I have decided to save up for another refractor, WO, Equinox or even toward an Esprit. However, I would also consider p/ex for an Intel NUC and/or Pegasus Astro Pocket Powerbox.
      Please excuse some of the colours - I used my astro modded 6D which was in the observatory so the "nice" purple is actually black !!
      Both these are collection only.




    • By LR Watanabe
      Is the Nikon Nikkor 55-200mm f/3.5-5.6 II a good lens for astrophotography? I plan on using the Nikon D5300 with it and I wanted to know if the 55-200 would be a good lens for photographing DSOs. Does anyone use this lens and if so, may I see some images taken with it? I can't seem to find images on Astrobin. Also, is it possible to photograph DSOs (M42, Rosette, Flaming star, M45 etc.) from a bortle 7 sky with the 55-200mm?
      Clear skies,
      LR
    • By Clear Skies!
      I am going to buy Skywatcher EQ5 Pro Go-To mount. But, unfortunately, I am low on budget.
      So, does someone know where can I buy the cheapest EQ5 pro mount?
      Yesterday there was a low price for it (350 €), but they changed it.
      Thank you for your time!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.