Jump to content

Hello


Tim star

Recommended Posts

Hi

Its taken me a while to make my first post mainly becuase I was waiting until I had a half decent photo to post. So here is my attempt at M104. Only 5x5 min subs, 5 darks, 10 bias and 10 flats. I observe from an elevated position just south of Bristol and have pretty good dark skies, especially to the South and East. I also am fortunate to have a site in Cornwall near the coast where the sky seems very black but it is often rather windy. I have a SW Equinox 80 Pro with HEQ5 Sysnscan and I must say am very impressed with this setup. Although obviously a beginner I started to get reasonable pictures straight away, only limited by patience to take enough subs and skill in processing. I have an Orion Magnificent Miniguider package which seems to work though to be honest the HEQ5 seems to track pretty well over 5 minutes or so. I did notice elliptical stars at the edges of the FOV and thought this was a guiding error but of course what it needed was a field flattener. I have the Televue TRF2008 0.8x FF/FR which was a bit pricey but gives nice round stars right out to the edge. I usually crop a bit anyway. Camera is Canon 1100D modded by "Cheap Astrophotography" which was brilliant - he needs a better name. I bought photoshop elements since the full program is so expensive but I have just done a 1 month free trial of photoshop cc and admit it does seem more flexible and resourceful, might go for the monthly subscription.

I have had a lot of "fun" trying to set up a semi-remote system. I would prefer to sit in the shed with a nice blow heater in my face looking at the monitor than stand around in the freezing cold. I obtained 10m USB repeater cables from Trixes which seem to work OK for the camera on Live View and the Guide cam. I tried to use EQMOD and its clearly a great system but I did get frequent freezes which was very frustrating and I think may have been due to data loss in the long cables. So I have the Southern Skies Sky-Fi linked to an ipad with Sky Safari and that works great.

I seem to have found that the imaging/refractor side most appeals to me, I like to have a record of what I have seen, though sometimes a wish I have a really big scope to look though. I soon found of course that planetary work with my setup is a waste of time.

Now, another reason for taking the plunge and making a post is that I have a bit of money to spend, and, more importantly, spousal approval. The obvious thing would be to step up to CCD imaging. I looked long and hard at the Atik 460 but am thinking that if I settled on a 414 I could buy another HEQ6 mount with roughly the same budget which I could keep at my second site to avoid lugging the mount and tripod about all the time. I know the FOV is small but I could continue to use the Canon for wide field and use the 414 for little faint targets.

Anyway, nothing too original here but thanks for a great forum, its informative and sometimes amusing to read!

Tim

post-30580-0-59162000-1433605241_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tim and welcome to SGL, nice introduction and quite obviously a dedicated imager, with a good degree of success with your image of M104, however, I would repost your thoughts on CCD imaging into the imaging sections, where you should find a wealth of helpful suggestions in connection with your future proposals, enjoy your Astrophotography and the forum :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tim and welcome to SGL from another dedicated and mad imager! :D

A great introduction and image :) A step up to a CCD is a good improvement for sure. I guess that it's a personal thing about what field of view that you'd like between the Atik 414 and 460. I had a 460 for a while and it was a nice camera. 

Have you checked out the field of view calculators out there?  FOV calculator If nebula's are your thing, you may find the 414 a little small and may lead toa mountain of mosaics to fit stuff in.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.