Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

M27- lets see your pictures.


pyrasanth

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Thanks Olly, 

What was the kit and the exposure?

 
 
Done in two different campsites Olly and two different scopes. 
We don't get a lot of clear skies here and have to get what we can, when we can.
 
Kelling Heath star Party Sept 2014

Ha 2 x 30mins & 2 x 20 mins

RGB 2 x 15mins binned x 2
Atik314L & Skywatcher ED120 on NEQ6
 
Cairds Campsite in West Sussex
Oiii using an ED80 and Focal reducer x 0.8
5 x 900secs binned x 2
 
Carole 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to go back a bit to find my last visit to M27 -  the year was 2007  - 6 hours of Ha and Oiii taken over 5 nights. I just caught a hint of the outer shell

which was as deep as I could go with kit back then, would love another try now.  Yes 6 hours over 5 nights., the skies were just as bad back then.

post-111-0-67284700-1437057043.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

A bit to late I sow this topic. Here is my Dumbell from August last year.

Aquisition was made with MN190 on EQ6/EQMOD and ATIK 314L+ mono.

Exposure in Ha and OIII - 8x1200 sec + 4x1800 sec Ha and 9x1200 sec in OIII.

post-10239-0-40028000-1437315571_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit baffled by the SII photograph. This looks like you have photographed a black hole. I'm photographing in SII at present (I took 30 5 min subs last night) & I see a nice dumbell- did something go wrong in your picture?

I played around with my M27 images (DSLR RGB) and found I could get the best results by splitting them into RGB or CMYK and then recombining. When split to CMYK the cyan channel looks just like the S11 photo above. Which is really counter-intuitive as I would have said the nebula was almost cyan in colour

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Using M27 as a test case to learn how to use the GIMP. With

no guiding or background subtraction, the familiar (to Video

Astronomers) "Mark of Zorro" Hot Pixels / Artifacts remain.

But I do think I am learning something. :p

post-539-0-28588700-1438940655.jpg

FWIW: Standard exposure are 100 x 5.12s integrations on

each of UHC (luminance), Ha (Red), and 2 x OIII (B & G).

"If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be research"? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a playful question: Does anyone know the VALUES of the

colours associated with H-Alpha and O(III) are in Dec/Hex? ;)

You do see quite a variety of different recipes for splitting the

pallet between RGB depending on the (assumed) "physics".

Do colours add linearly, or in quadrature (to sound clever!) :p

Maybe a "convention" is best. It is probably impossible to be

very quantitative? Just something I have been wondering...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a playful question: Does anyone know the VALUES of the

colours associated with H-Alpha and O(III) are in Dec/Hex? ;)

You do see quite a variety of different recipes for splitting the

pallet between RGB depending on the (assumed) "physics".

Do colours add linearly, or in quadrature (to sound clever!) :p

Maybe a "convention" is best. It is probably impossible to be

very quantitative? Just something I have been wondering...

Candidate Convention :

HA  656nm -> Hex: #ff0000

OIII 500.7nm -> Hex: #00ff87

Theory :

But then if you have lets say a 7nm (like the common Baader HA one) filter what does it mean exactly?  You get all wavelengths between 652,5nm and 659,5? I have no clue :D

Usefull links :

http://academo.org/demos/wavelength-to-colour-relationship/

which I think is based on the oldish but somewhat acceptable among physicists FORTRAN code from here

http://www.physics.sfasu.edu/astro/color/spectra.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could try overlaying the spectral lines of this (spectral response of human eye from WP):

287px-Cones_SMJ2_E.svg.png

And then mix RGB according to the resulting amounts or R, G & B.

HA would be mostly red with a touch of green and a tiny hint of blue.

OIII would be mostly green with a fair bit of red and somewhat less blue.

The main difference is that this assigns a fair bit of red to OIII.

This would then approximate what you would see if you just viewed the filtered light, but I I'm not saying it would make an attractive or informative result.

triggers a fair response from the red cones too, but it seems the brain figures out it is not yellow by the presence of the small blue signal.

(I have found this topic fascinating for years and still haven't found a fully satisfying explanation of why violet looks the ways it does in real life, on film and on screen).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks (to most recently liked) for the above. Also a subject (colour mixing) that

has interested me ever since I began dabbling... I think mine was "a bit green"! :p

Perhaps we will never arrive at "the truth" . But plenty of food for thought...

Not least (+1), for the inclusion of a bit of venerable FORTRAN code. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

One from 2009 when I actually did some Astrophotography,,,

Baader BCF Modified Canon 1000D on CPC 800 XLT @ approximately f6.3
Hutech IDAS P2 2" filter

33 light frames made up of...

4h 24m @ ISO800 including 3h of 30m subs
4h 45m @ ISO1600 in 15m subs

Master Flats for both ISO800 and ISO1600 Produced from 50+ random selected skyflats from 100+

Master Bias for both ISO800 and ISO1600 Produced from 50* bias frames selected at random from 100+

No Dark Frames

Crop from Full frame...

 

M27-Traditional_800.jpg

Peter...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.