Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Good evening everyone.  

This is my second light report using my SkyWatcher 300p Flextube.  First light was a bit of a rush because the opportunity came without much notice.  This time however, I had a bit more time to plan.  As you can see, it went well.  Very well.

I’d been looking forward to Sunday evening for quite a few days.  Throughout the latter part of last week, the weather forecast was suggesting that the skies would be clear for a good deal of the afternoon and through into the small hours.  The only issue being, work would get in the way on Monday morning.

So, in plenty of time, I set the scope up outside whilst it was still light, and then came to wait until darkness.  I used that time to get a few more ideas on what I could target for the evening.  Following on from first light for the SBT on the 21st, I decided that I would quite like to get back to the constellation of Leo.  I also decided that Gemini would be a good area to explore.  Armed with my notebook, Telrad chart and pocket atlas, I headed out to the garden and sat in the dark for a while before putting the Telrad on the scope and getting everything lined up.

To Leo.  I wanted to make sure that what I had seen during first light of the scope was true.  I still couldn't quite believe what else was visible through the 12” mirror in comparison to the 6”.  I made a note in my book about the seeing.  Though not brilliant, it was still the clearest sky around here for quite a while.

My first target of note for the evening was NGC 2903 which is a spiral galaxy of magnitude 9.6.  I found the target quite easily using the Telrad.  However, I couldn't really see much structure if any.  A faint fuzzy it certainly was.  Around my observing point, there were various lights being switched on and off by the neighbours as people began to settle down for the evening.  I think without this minor interference, I could have seen a lot more.  The back garden does actually get very dark once people have settled down and gone to bed.  Unfortunately, I didn't have the luxury of a late night so it will be a target to revisit in better conditions.

Next in Leo, I paid a visit to M65 and M66.  They appeared exactly as I remembered them.  Both easily visible in the same FOV through the 32mm EP, but again without too much detail involved.  Then, I thought it would be worth a quick view of a target visited many times before, M44 The Beehive Cluster.  It was pleasing to see it again and is certainly much richer with the aid of the 12” mirror.

Having spent a bit of time looking around Leo, I paid a quick visit to Gemini and the cluster of M25.  A pretty target that really filled the EP.  Not as bright as M44, but still very well defined.

I decided to take a seat for a while, and under red torch light, flicked through the atlas and just gazed around the sky spotting as many stars as possible in the constellations of Leo and Hydra.  Sometimes, I find it just as relaxing and enjoyable and when it comes to finding targets, a bit more knowledge always helps!

Then, it was time to look at the constellation of Ursa Major.  Nice and high in the sky, the pocket atlas shows many targets that I've tried for but not managed to locate in the past.  M63 was on the list, technically in Canes Venatici, but kind of in the right area of the sky.  I’m afraid to say again, probably because of local light pollution and poorly adapted night vision, the target was nothing more than a grey smudge for me.  But, it’s definitely whetted the appetite for a revisit under darker skies.  While in that locality, I nudged the SBT on to M51, the Whirpool Galaxy.  For me, this was probably the best target of the night.  Not really appreciating what it looked like from a photo, I made a note in my book that I could see two distinct light spots very close to each other.  They didn't look like two completely independent objects given the light areas that seemed to join them.  In my mind, I recalled an image I have seen in a magazine of what looked to be a spiral galaxy almost consuming a neighbouring galaxy.  I wondered if this is what I was looking at.  I was really pleased when I verified what I thought I saw when I came back indoors and saw a similar image on stellarium.  What a cracking sight that was.

I felt like I was on a bit of role, so I decided to go for two more targets in Ursa Major before calling it a night.  The first was M109.  In stellarium, it’s referred to as the Vacuum Cleaner Galaxy, a new one on me.  Because of its proximity to the star Phecda, I found it very easy to locate, but quite tricky to distinguish.  I found it easier to nudge the scope a little so Phecda wasn't in the field of view.  This meant that M109 was now towards the edge of the field of view, but it meant that the comparative brightness of the star wasn't detracting from the image of the galaxy.

Finally, a little further nudge towards Merak brought the final target into view, M108, the Surfboard Galaxy.  In the Telrad charts, it was given as a magnitude 10 object.  The first mag 10 object I’d been able to find in my short hobby time as an observer.    In the faint grey colouring of the galaxy, I thought I could make out a very small single pinprick of light that stuck out quite well.  I assumed this to be the core of the galaxy.

So all in all, a very enjoyable and exciting observing session that brought a raft of new objects to my tick list.  Whilst I’m sure the scope is capable of so much more again, especially with some mods including a shroud and possibly flocking, it really is demonstrating its brilliant abilities under my ‘back yard’ conditions.  As you might have noticed, there was no mention of changing EPs during the session.  I made a conscious decision before I started that I would use exclusively the 32mm EP.  There are so many new combinations to now try on so many more targets that have now come within observational reach that I haven’t yet started tinkering with getting the best from each target.  That will come in time.

Thanks for reading.

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Nick,

I don't live too far from Lucksall at all but this year just couldn't make SGL 10.  Dates just didn't fall well for me.  I'm glad that you got some good clear observing weather down here though.  I love that river side location for observing.  Here's hoping for next year!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By stevewanstall
      A very crisp and cold night.  I added more luminance data and also collected some RGB for NGC 2841. There is now around 4 hours in L and an hour each in R, G and B. The subs are 114s at a gain of 139. 

      NGC 2841 is an unbarred spiral galaxy in the northern circumpolar constellation of Ursa Major. A 2001 Hubble Space Telescope survey of the galaxy's Cepheid variables determined its distance to be approximately 14.1 megaparsecs or 46 million light-years. 
      This is the prototype for the flocculent spiral galaxy, a type of spiral galaxy whose arms are patchy and discontinuous. The morphological class is SAa, indicating a spiral galaxy with no central bar and very tightly-wound arms. There is no grand design structure visible in the optical band, although some inner spiral arms can be seen in the near infrared. 
      The properties of NGC 2841 are similar to those of the Andromeda Galaxy. It is home to a large population of young blue stars, and a few H II regions. The luminosity of the galaxy is 2×1010 M☉ and it has a combined mass of 7×1010 M☉. Its disk of stars can be traced out to a radius of around 228 kly (70 kpc). This disk begins to warp at a radius of around 98 kly (30 kpc), suggesting the perturbing effect of in-falling matter from the surrounding medium.
      The rotational behaviour of the galaxy suggests there is a massive nuclear bulge, with a low-ionization nuclear emission-line region  at the core; a type of region that is characterized by spectral line emission from weakly ionized atoms. A prominent molecular ring is orbiting at a radius of 7–20 kly (2–6 kpc), which is providing a star-forming region of gas and dust. The nucleus appears decoupled and there is a counter-rotating element of stars and gas in the outer parts of the nucleus, suggesting a recent interaction with a smaller galaxy.
      Equipment: Celestron 9.25 XLT at F10, Skywatcher EQ6 Pro GEM, ZWO 1600MM Pro, ZWO EFW with ZWO LRGB filters, QHY5IIC guide camera on Skywatcher 9 x 50 finderscope
    • By jackrussell0232
      Who knew renovating a house could take so long - and it's still a long way from being finished (maybe I shouldn't have tried to tackle it all myself...)
      But having finally uncovered some of the boxes containing my kit, and with a bit more free time than normal, I decided to have another go, starting with one of the top targets this time of year. (I am working from home, honestly).
      I felt like I was learning again from scratch.  But at least I've discovered the masked stretch.  This image might be over-saturated for some tastes, but what can I say, it's the first time I've managed to get any colour in my
      stars! 🙂
      20x10 mins L
      10x300s RGB
      Altair Astro Wave 115 refractor, SBIG STF8300M, GM1000HPS (never managed to get it to track unguided, but at least it can be guided now)

    • By stevewanstall
      Celestron 9.25 at f6.3, SW EQ6R pro, Canon 550 D modded
      The galaxy group Hickson 44 in Leo. This is based on 29 x 240 s, plus bias and flats.

      Hickson 44 in Leo:

      There are some other galaxies near by, some of which are names in this overlay from Astrometry.net:

      Overlay from Astrometry, naming the other objects:

      The main ones are NGC 3190, NGC 3185, NGC 3187 and NGC 3193. NGC 3190 has a well defined dust lane. NGC 3187 is a barred spiral galaxy with two arms. NGC 3193 is an elliptical galaxy.
      The light captured by my camera last night left these galaxies just after the extinction event killed the dinosaurs on Earth.
      From APOD: Galaxies, like stars, frequently form groups. A group of galaxies is a system containing more than two galaxies but less than the tens or hundreds typically found in a cluster of galaxies. A most notable example is the Local Group of Galaxies, which houses over 30 galaxies including our Milky Way, Andromeda, and the Magellanic Clouds. Pictured above is nearby compact group Hickson 44. This group is located about 60 million light-years away toward the constellation of Leo. Also known as the NGC 3190 Group, Hickson 44 contains several bright spiral galaxies and one bright elliptical galaxy on the upper right. The bright source on the upper left is a foreground star. Many galaxies in Hickson 44 and other compact groups are either slowly merging or gravitationally pulling each other apart.
      Abell 1367
      This image is based on 19 x 300 s , plus flats and bias. It shows a LOT of galaxies, in a grouping called Abell 1367. In this image you are looking at part of one of the biggest structures in the Universe, the Great Wall.

      The Leo Cluster (Abell 1367) is a galaxy cluster about 330 million light-years distant (z = 0.022) in the constellation Leo, with at least 70 major galaxies. The galaxy known as NGC 3842 is the brightest member of this cluster. Along with the Coma Cluster, it is one of the two major clusters comprising the Coma Supercluster, which in turn is part of the CfA2 Great Wall, which is hundreds of millions light years long and is one of the largest known structures in the universe.
      The overlay from Astrometry gives some of the galaxies visible in the image.

    • By wimvb
      This will be my last image this season. The moon is all too bright atm, and astro darkness ends in a few days.
      This image was a real challenge, both in acquisition and in processing. I haven't completely tamed the MN190 yet, collimation is still a bit off. Visually it looks ok, but when I start imaging, I get star shapes that suggest that collimation is still way out. First I thought that it might be the addition of an oag to the imaging train that was the cause of it all, but I've now come to the conclusion that it actually is collimation.
      Anyways, the details:
      MN190 on AZ-EQ6 ZWO ASI174MM-Cool at -20 C with ZWO filters Guiding was a mixture of ST80 guidescope, OAG (the new ZWO version), and finder guider (9x50) with PHD2 L. 92 x 2 minutes, gain 20, collected April 15 under a 70 % moon R, G: 30 x 4 minutes each, collected March 31 and during two nights in April B: 22 x 4 minutes, collected March 31 and during one night in April Processed in PixInsight

      Larger version is here:
      If anyone wants to have a go at LRGB processing, here's the raw data. Only crop and DBE applied. Have fun!
    • By Maxrayne
      So I was out the other night collecting images for a star trails of Ursa Major over the top of my daughter's tree in the front garden. Out of curiosity more than anything, I thought I'd give time lapse a shot. The attached is low res as I'm still messing around with what codec etc works best. The original avi file was pushing 8gb for 7 seconds!! Managed to get it down to 22mb but can't find anything inbetween. I'll keep playing though.
      Original raw files cleaned up in Lightroom, then exported out as Jpg's into After Effects. The trails image used the same Jpg set but was put together in Star Stax. As pretty much first attempts at both, I'm happy.
      Nikon D5300, 18mm @ f / 3.5, ISO 800, 162 x 25 seconds
      Millie's Tree & Ursa Major Timelapse Test.avi
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.