Jump to content

92335031_Perseidsmeteorshowerbanner.jpg.f082cb58353bce3cc854fb958f76fc98.jpg

Black holes and radiation


Recommended Posts

I am not an expert in the subject, so please take easy what I am saying. Experts are welcome to correct (or reject this information).

As far as I know, in quantum mechanics you have casual formation of particle and its respective antiparticle. These two annihilate with each other. Now, Hawking thought about what happens if this happens sufficiently close to the event horizon of a black hole. 

Let's assume that this formation particle-antiparticle happens very close to the event horizon. If in this generation one is captured in the black hole, and the other one isn't, then they fully materialise (matter and antimatter annihilate when get in touch). 

The one that does not enter, therefore has a chance to escape. From the outside you should detect this/these particle(s), which are called Hawking radiation. 

Then he continued on this, with the theory that they become warmer and warmer until they eventually evaporate.

I haven't studied the physics behind, but I am not very convinced this radiation really exists or is significant, for a few reasons: 

1) (as you said), why are then black?

2) what is the probability that this formation and separation happens effectively, instead of forming/annihilate inside or outside the black hole? 

3) Assuming that this formation/separation happens near the horizon, I am not really aware of his detection. If this is very weak, what is the probability that it has a real effect for the future of the black hole?

On the other hand, if this really exists, this would also mean that black holes implicitly 'help' generate energy or matter (or antimatter) (invalidating other physical laws, although here we are talking about singularities). Could galaxies be the result of matter formed by a super maxi black hole?  :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be totally off here, but if Hawking radiation is based upon virtual particles and if virtual particles are in fact dark energy, could this imply that Black holes actually radiate dark energy?

Edited by Earl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

according to the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle, rotating black holes should create and emit particles.Hawking radiation reduces the mass and the energy of the black hole and is therefore also known as black hole evaporation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.