Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

First galaxy (M81/82) - a couple of issues/questions


Paul-F

Recommended Posts

I had a go at M81/82 last night, I collected 30 @ 3 mins iso 800 and 22 at 1 min iso1600 (lost about 15 overall to wind/trails). First proper go at anything so playing with the settings to see what effect they have. The moon was bright and washed out most of the sky visually, and a few clouds were whizzing by so wasn't sure what to expect tbh. Battery ran out after taking 5 darks and no flats so processed what I had.

Here's a single 3 minute unguided sub straight off the camera @ iso800. Given that I can easily get 3 minute subs unguided will a light pollution filter be of significant benefit (more exposure time but more contrast) ? Secondly, made evident in the second pic with some contrast adjustment, there's something up with the sensor I think (bottom edge on the left) and I have now seen this on daytime shots as well and when using different lenses .... on bright images I don't see it but can make it visible if I try. Any other comments welcome ....

Raw Image:

post-20262-0-93090500-1423324463_thumb.j

Contrast Adjusted:

post-20262-0-47214700-1423324970_thumb.j

Final stacked image with only 5 darks applied - still working on it as I seem to lose a lot of definition if I make the background consistently black.

post-20262-0-95877000-1423323719_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Paul, nice shot! I went out to try these two last night, got the scope set up, looked up and the cloud had appeared out of nowhere!!!  :mad:

I think adding some flats would help with the final image, I can imagine the frustration when the battery ran out! Not sure what equipment you are using, but I "splashed out" on a £30 Skywatcher LPF and found it works pretty well in my basic set-up. I posted about it here:

http://stargazerslounge.com/topic/234757-skywatcher-light-pollution-filter-first-use/

If you can get longer exposures, you might also consider the Astronomik clip-in filters if you have a Canon. They are a lot more expensive, but probably more effective over longer exposures. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Paul, 

Done a quick (2 minutes) background subtract for you, just to give you an idea of what software can do!

I am by no means an expert, only been doing this a few months myself, so Im sure others could do a lot more!

post-39747-0-39199400-1423336513.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice work! You could now use a plug-in like HLVG to remove the overall green tint and then something like gradient xterminator and it will look even better.

Looking into this, thanks! I have lightroom but not photoshop - is there a decent freebie out there that will get rid of the green stuff ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Paul, nice shot! I went out to try these two last night, got the scope set up, looked up and the cloud had appeared out of nowhere!!!  :mad:

I think adding some flats would help with the final image, I can imagine the frustration when the battery ran out! Not sure what equipment you are using, but I "splashed out" on a £30 Skywatcher LPF and found it works pretty well in my basic set-up. I posted about it here:

http://stargazerslounge.com/topic/234757-skywatcher-light-pollution-filter-first-use/

If you can get longer exposures, you might also consider the Astronomik clip-in filters if you have a Canon. They are a lot more expensive, but probably more effective over longer exposures. 

My shot was 3 mins in moonlight so maybe not beneficial to the same degree but at that price it is worth a go I'd say ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, program called Pixinsight, especially for AP.

Quick run through photoshop will get rid of the green as well:-

Ill stop messing around with your pics now! There are plenty of videos on youtube on how to get the best out of AP images. Tis a big learning curve!

post-39747-0-29152900-1423337043.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.