Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Shortening a newtonian, need help with the math.

LamboDiabloSVTT

Recommended Posts

LamboDiabloSVTT

LamboDiabloSVTT

Posted
Posted

So, I'm preparing to shorten the tube of my Orion Starblast 4.5 OTA to use it with a DSLR.

The process of doing so is simple enough, but I don't know how much I should cut. For every millimeter I need to move the camera on the focuser, how much of the tube should I remove?

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bingevader

bingevader

Posted
Posted

In theory yes, but if you are moving the camera by the same amount then the resulting focal length will be the same.

But, I'll refer you to this similar thread, with regards to the comments on moving the 1° mirror a relatively large distance and the resulting requirement for a larger 2°!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JamesF

JamesF

Posted
Posted

In theory yes, but if you are moving the camera by the same amount then the resulting focal length will be the same.

You can do what you like with the camera :)  The focal length is a property of the curvature of the primary mirror.  It will not change if you shorten the tube.

This is the entire point of moving the mirror up the tube.  If the camera can't move inwards enough to reach the focal plane, 450mm "in front" of the mirror, then shortening the tube by 30mm will move the focal plane 30mm "outwards" with respect to the focuser, hopefully putting it somewhere such that the camera can be placed to have the sensor coincide with the focal plane.

Where this doesn't hold is when you have two or more optical components in the optical path, such as in an SCT or Mak.  They are focused by moving the mirror and in fact the focal length changes at the same time (because the effective focal length is a function of the distance(s) between the optical components).

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LamboDiabloSVTT

LamboDiabloSVTT

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Very interesting. Thanks for the speedy and specific responses guys!

In theory yes, but if you are moving the camera by the same amount then the resulting focal length will be the same.

But, I'll refer you to this similar thread, with regards to the comments on moving the 1° mirror a relatively large distance and the resulting requirement for a larger 2°!

Yeah, I've come to accept that I'll lose some of the light. This scope was built with a larger secondary though, and at f4 I don't expect this to be a huge problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hazegood

hazegood

Posted
Posted

personally I wouldn't actually shorten the tube, that could effect the resale value,   I need to move the primary in my  astromaster, and am looking at using longer mounting screws with spacers or washers and again for the collimation screws to move the mirror up the tube


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LamboDiabloSVTT

LamboDiabloSVTT

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Got some assistance from my dad, since four hands to hold it steady are better than two... sawed 30mm off the end. Mission success! It is incredibly windy, clouds are rolling in, and the moon is drowning out the sky, but I am indeed able to focus on the moon now!

Even better, I can still see all of my primary mirror clips during collimation, so I don't think I'm losing much light, if any.

I'm excited for some better astronomy nights now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.