Caz Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 I was wondering, is it a neccessity to have dual axis controls, or would a single do? Theres one little problem I have with the thought of a motor though, the batteries, I don't want to have to replace them constantly, so is there a way around this? Its funny how my views have changed since getting the scope, I thought I could make do without motors, but considering I want some higher ep's, a motor is the way to go. Saturn is already moving at pace at 200 mag, as you know.... :shock:Theres probably already a thread on this kind of question, but couldn't find it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 You could get away with a RA motor as long as you are perfectly polar aligned.Im sure someone will correct me if i am wrong but motors cost about £50for a set which will give you RA & DEC.A little advice here don't skimp on this sort of thing as they are the bits thatmake all the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 One drive is fine Caz, the only problem is that you will have to start again if you ever want to have two as the hand controllers and connectors are different. Skies the Limit sell a dual drive system for £70 which is about the same price as you'd get a single drive for anywhere else.The EQ5 motors are pretty ecomonical on the batteries but you could always get one of those portable PoweStations or rechargeable batteries....Also I'd recommened you get a lower power eyepiece before you get a highter ones, theres been some OK 32mm Celestron Plossels up on Ebay for £15, it'll be easier to find faint objects (M78 ) with lower magnification (brigher objects) and a bigger FOV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 [quote author=SkyGuy link=topic=2500.msg25687#msg25687 date=11379419Im sure someone will correct me if i am wrong but motors cost about £50for a set which will give you RA & DEC.I think dual drives from Sherwoods are about £130......RA only are about £70. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 Knew someone would :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 Knew someone would :lol:I'm wrong as well Single is £80, dual are £120. At those prices I'd get the dual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 I've got a 32mm Celestron, it's a good EP for the money. You'd pay around 45-55 quid in the shops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark RD Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 Skies the Limit sell a dual drive system for £70 which is about the same price as you'd get a single drive for anywhere else.Can't find the website Gaz... Thats their ebay name try this cazhttp://www.skiesunlimited.co.uk/Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 http://www.skysthelimit.org.uk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark RD Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 Thats interesting both links go to the same place :shock: Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 Skies the Limit sell a dual drive system for £70 which is about the same price as you'd get a single drive for anywhere else.Are they the same as the official Skywatcher drives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 Caz,I have just the one drive (RA). As long as you're Polar aligned then it's fine. With the EQ mounts they are designed to be polar aligned, so if you have dual axis drives and the mount is not polar aligned you'll spend most of the night slewing around with the hand controller trying to keep the target in the eyepiece instead of studying the object.Wait until you get the patio done and have a go at polar aligning and tracking with one, the RA axis drive. If you're polar alignment is fairly good you won't need the DEC drive.I'll get my coat.......Greg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark RD Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 The second drive is there only to for fine adjust and is useful if your using a high magnification and the slightest movement could lose the object your looking at, but otherwise its not needed IMHOMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 Caz,If you ever go the route of planetary imaging, the DEC drive will become a must. Or even high power visual, it's such a joy having both axis powered. It doesn't matter how well you polar align, a high powered planet, especially when imaging, will drift out. And it doesn't matter how lightly you try and correct the DEC with the manual slow motion, the image (visual or imaging) dances all over the place. Completely hands free is the only way with an EQ5 that has the 8" Newt on board.I would also highly recommend a second accessory too. The Orion USA Accufocus. It's an electric focus upgrade for your scope and an absolute must! No more vibrations when focusing, completely enhances the enjoyment of using your scope. And only £42.This would make you scope hands free and vibration free.....joy! The Skies Unlimited drives are not made by Synta but should fit the Synta (Skywatcher) EQ5. The pictures on the Skiesunlimted website are for the EQ2/EQ3 drives. I can't find any pics of the EQ5 drives. :?RegardsRuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 Or the "budget, vibration free, fine focusser". ie a big clothes peg on one of your focusser wheels....and yes, it does work!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 Caz, here's a link to the Accufocus. http://www.scsastro.co.uk/it040081.htmAs you've already found out, the damp down time with the Explorer 200 is 3-5secs but it seems a lot longer. So the Accufocus is worth every penny.I bought the Accufocus myself (sold it to Ant when I sold the Explorer) and it's a breeze to fit and a dream to use.Russ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 Or try Gaz's tip first.Who's the girl in your avatar Gaz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 Who's the girl in your avatar Gaz? Denise Richards, I was just fiddling with my account settings and she's one of the default avatars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 Thought it was. But for a moment i thought you were going to say your better half was the spitting image of Denise Richards.Russ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warthog Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 I can't find any pics of the EQ5 drives. RegardsRusshttp://islandeyepiece.com/shopdisplayproducts.asp?id=476&cat=Skywatcher+Mounts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 Wood or plastic is OK, although you can get the plastic ones in the same colour as your scope!!! If you put a peg on one side of the focusser (you might have to unscrew one of the wheels and attach it to the bar instead), you can then fine focus by resting your index finger on the end of the peg and moving it. The larger arc gives you more accurate focussing and the increased leverage means you can move the focusser using less force and a lot smoother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 It's straight out of "The Skinflints Guide to Practical Astronomy"....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.