Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

The "No EQ" DSO Challenge!


JGM1971

Recommended Posts

As the clouds are up I am restacking old data. Here is a mix of ISO200 and 400, exposure times and even 200 subs of M31 setting (180 rotated with regard to the rest!!!), total subs 562 , total integration time 1:45, corresponding flats and biases. 

Stacked in groups in DSS with average mode and all the rest of the settings as per startools. 

Heavy crop and process in Startoolsm31threegroups.thumb.jpeg.ca8118a438a3002048154102c7d48331.jpeg

Edited by patraip1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Horsehead and flame

just 73 lights 15sec iso400, flats and bias. 

Skywatcher 130p azgti, nikon D5500 prime focus, DSS, ST, SnapseedSAVE_20211205_011459.thumb.jpg.422b874f9a45630336dccef2f79b143e.jpg

my mount is having issues.... I will open it up to service it. My azimuth axis is not tracking well. I had to discard 209 frames with obvious tracking issues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some fantastic images in here; taken me a few days to get through the whole thread :)

I  have been thinking about picking up the Skywatcher AZ GTI mount and attempting some of these shots myself... I was wondering how I would go about attaching my DSLR and lens to the mount though? Assume some kind of L bracket would be needed?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

some more pictures I took 2 nights ago together with the flame and horsehead nebula.... 

180 frames of NGC 891 and 87 from an older session for a total of 267 subs of 15sec, flats and bias DSS ST Snapseed taken with my heritage 130p and Nikon D5500 on a azgti mount

SAVE_20211205_211842.thumb.jpg.ec72f7e58eef191a4d7b556b1b9375ab.jpg

 

180 light frames 15 sec of M42. same setup as above (before my tracking issues) 

SAVE_20211205_211712.thumb.jpg.759998ee1ee915bddace4f624691492e.jpg

and here is my previous attempt at m42 @iso200 100subs of 15sec for comparison

SAVE_20211030_191542.thumb.jpg.430ae753bf597640474511b0c9d5033c.jpg

 

Edited by patraip1
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

well there have been occasional clear nights.... Unfortunately the old data from m42 are in another laptop to which I currently do not have access. Do you think iso 400 or iso 200 looks better? I still have not decided what my goto ISO will be. I think 400 brings out nebulosity better even if slightly, but is bloating the stars a little.... 

Opinions are very much welcome! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok here goes my setup

I have a Nikon D5500. I bought it 2nd hand. I tried to find a dslr with as little weight as possible and the D5500 has an awesome sensor for AP!!! Extremely low noise and isoless. The only negative it has is that it does not capture red Ha very well. 

I removed the camera stock lens and have attached these two items on the camera body

Screenshot_2021-12-16-09-56-20-601_com.banggood.client.thumb.jpg.d273decd77f1321eaf96ce9014f35b03.jpgScreenshot_2021-12-16-09-55-26-045_com.banggood.client.thumb.jpg.2b052a8452a081db8d8cb0e3e0e5072d.jpg

I simply then slip the camera with the T adapter into the focuser just like any other 1,25" eyepiece... 

IMG_20211025_130358.thumb.jpg.abbc8d8b9429e94b8da59406e5d9f592.jpg

the blue cable wires you see is just an extra strengthening step but not really necessay, the focuser handles the weight of my nikon (420gr) easily.... 

You can also see the brown thin electrical tape (more on that later) 

IMG_20211025_130349.thumb.jpg.3217780919e85ceaacf697395b2b2ca3.jpg

A light shroud is absolutely necassary. I also have fabricated a dew shield about 30cm long (from the same black paper I used for the light shroud) which I put in the front end of the OTA just before taking the pictures after I have framed my target and checked my tracking and taken my test frames. This is very important in keeping stray light from nearby sources to a minimum. I also take my flats with the dew/straylight shield on at the end of my imaging session pointing the entire rig to a laptop sceen playing a youtube video named :"24 hours of pure white" from a distance of about 1,5 meters in a completely dark room. Flats taken with a tablet on top the end of the telescope covered with a white t shirt were a huge problem for me at the beggining, because light found its way directky from the secondary to the camera......

I have the heritage mounted on an Skywatcher AZGTI alt az mount

IMG_20211025_130505.thumb.jpg.828c65ea702abfd3694e72c1044dd667.jpg

I also put a counterweight on the bar of 1kg.You can also see the distance that the trusses are retrieved in order to achieve prime focus with my dslr. 

I have a layer of thin electrical tape in the focuser threads which makes the focuser very hard to screw and unscrew but once I find focus I never have to move the focuser again for many imaging session. I have the focuser almost completely screwd in. (You will have to try moving the trusses inwards while focusing on a star) The shorter the length of the telescope the shorter the F becomes, so you can capture more light!! When I had the trusses adjusted I was just shy of perfect focus. I then used 1/8 to 1/4 of a turn of the focuset to achieve perfect focus. It was actually very easy. Just make sure the focuser threads are covered with the tape and it is very very tight, because otherwise it is very easy to lose focus if the camera twists even a little and twists the focuser along with it. Screw the 2 screws that hold the tring adapter to the focuser evenly. If you want a different frame rotate just the camera! The focuser must be tight!! 

I focus on Jupiters moons with the camera in live view and maximum zoom until I see the smaller possible moons. I asked a friend with a 3d printer to make me a bahtinov mask which I found in this link

https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2493073

I have only used it once since it comfirmed my already focused camera was spot on!

Cheers and clear skies!!

 

Edited by patraip1
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
1 hour ago, mxgallagher said:

Not been out with the camera/scope for a while, but managed this the other night with my go-to dob and my phone. (2 different edits of the same 4min single sub)

PXL_20220108_205553995.NIGHT-02.jpeg

PXL_20220108_205553995.NIGHT-01.jpeg

Both great images, nice to see you got your scope out at last the top inage is brilliant and the core very well controlled 👌

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got back out last night and despite the he full moon managed to get some OK(ish) images of M31

Top is 26mins worth of mixed 8s 10s and 30s subs

Bottom is 72x10s subs with 10 darks and 10 bias.

All images taken with my 70d on my 250mm go-to dob, then stacked and stretched in SIRIL 

Looks like I need to take some flats though - might try to take some today

 

M31 26mins 17-1-22.jpg

M31 72x10@1600 17-1-22.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.