Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

5x powermate with a C8 SCT


Aenima

Recommended Posts

Hi, 

Can anyone tell me whether a C8 will accept a 5xpowermate for planetary imaging?

I have seen a number of great images with similar combinations to the above, and recently tried 3x barlow with the C8 and it seemed to be pushing the scope a bit, but ive no idea whether the scope can handle 5x easily or whether its depending on seeing conditions being good. etc.

The actual scope is in need of better colimation so that might be a factor affecting the test using 3x barlow. :p

Any ideas hugely welcome 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, yes the 3x was quite a jump up - i have seen the 5x used with SCT's generally and was unsure of its design being different from barlows. :p

I wonder what kind of situation the 5x powermate can be used?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My camera is a toss-up between the ASI120MC and the Lu070m (icx424al)

The scopes are those in my signature if its any use :)

I knew for visual purposes the magnification is way too high, esp for the SCT -  but for imaging its not quite so extreme.

There are formulas and such that apply but my maths is awful :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The maths are not difficult. The C8 is an F/10.

With a 5x powermate it becomes an F/50. And with a 3x barlow it becomes an F/30.

No its pretty simple i just have trouble doing it :) lol

I still not sure whether the optimal pixel/focal length is the 'maximum' or  just the best match results wise..?

Something like that. i'm figuring out if the actual scope is performing properly (and collimated), regarding C8's in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pic the camera with more sensitive and less noisy sensor (ICX424 is old and history). As for optimal f/ratio it depends on the target. Mars likes to overscale and Drizzle in processing. Saturn is dim and that's not possible with current imaging technology (doesn't bright and clean enough image at short exposures) as well disk features doesn't seems to take as much advantage as Mars does. Jupiter is somewhere in between. It can overscale/Drizzle easily but only if the seeing is perfect. At average it's better to stick to the "safe" lower max f/ratio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.