Jump to content

widefield ep


algol

Recommended Posts

Someone better give a reply.

Yes that will give you a fairly wide field, and it is fairly inexpensive.

It does say best in F/6 and slower, so do not expect greatness from it.

Have to say I did similar for a Mak, I wanted as wide a field as I could, I bought a 40mm, there is supposidly no difference but I had read that the 40mm gave a very tiny bit more. So it was either the same field or possibly a teeny bit more.

One thing to take into account is that something like a 25mm BST Starguider will deliver the same field of view as a 30mm plossl.

Which makes it all interesting by the time you work it all out.

The eyepiece will do what you want, the eye relief may mean you have to hold your head/eye some distance back from the eyepiece asn it will be around 20-22mm. This could be a little troublesome.

You should get a 6.4mm exit pupil, 20x magnification, which at night should be pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was starting over again I wouldn't bother with the 32mm plossl, I have one but it doesn't work very well in fast scopes, I would get a 24mm Maxvision SWA(68') it will give the same true field but with a sharper, wider apparent field and much more wow factor.

Its £66 but it should be future proof if you upgrade your scope.

James.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1 for the Max Vision. Really quality eyepiece.

It is worth spending a bit more on good eyepieces. You don't have to go mad. But saving £20/£30 is often false economy. The BSTs that Ronin mentioned are about as cheap as I would go.

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are on a tight budget the 32mm plossl will show you just about as much sky as the 1.25" format can. The apparent field of a 40mm plossl is limited to 43 degrees so you see about as much sky but it's like looking down a narrower tube.

While a shorter / wider wide field like the Maxvision is nice and perhaps more "future proof" you can get 32mm plossls for under £20 on the used market and it's difficult to argue with that if you want to keep your costs right down. I've had a few over the years and enjoyed them :smiley:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.