Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Fordos Moon

First Image of Jupiter with ASI120MM - advice please

Recommended Posts

post-26268-0-84576700-1395648716.jpg

Morning All,

Last night I managed this image of Jupiter and I would appreciate your tips on how to improve it.

Equipment was 200P on HEQ5 with ASI120MM and Televue 2.5 powermate.

Captured in Firecapture beta. 60 seconds. 512x440. Gain 41. Exposure time 13.65. 72 fps. Gamma 26.

Processed in Virtual Dub, Castrator, AS2 and Registax 6.

Whilst content with the image for my first with the new camera, I know better will come.

My initial thoughts are:

1. Should I have taken a 2 minute AVI or is 4,300 frames enough?

2. Is the main problem I am out of focus and should work more on this next time?

3. I notice a slight onion ring. Have I overdone the sliders?

Your advice as always would be most appreciated.

Edited by Fordos Moon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not bad for a first effort with a new camera. I think there is a bit of onion-ringing going on, which can be a case of exposure or gain set too low. I use the histogram tool in firecapture to ensure about 80-80% of the ADC range is used. This helps a lot. Focus is always a hassle, and I use the moons quite a lot to judge focus. My best shots with the ASI120MC to date have been at F/20, so maybe you can go beyond the F/15 which you are using.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not bad for a first effort with a new camera. I think there is a bit of onion-ringing going on, which can be a case of exposure or gain set too low. I use the histogram tool in firecapture to ensure about 80-80% of the ADC range is used. This helps a lot. Focus is always a hassle, and I use the moons quite a lot to judge focus. My best shots with the ASI120MC to date have been at F/20, so maybe you can go beyond the F/15 which you are using.

Michael many thanks for this, and I will take "not bad for a first effort" quite happily. I will make a note to check out the firecapture histogram - thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael many thanks for this, and I will take "not bad for a first effort" quite happily. I will make a note to check out the firecapture histogram - thanks again!

My first capture with the ASI120MC was a good deal worse.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks ok looks soft to me focus seems a tad of but all round looks like a first attempt I would not worry.mine was nothing like this just a ball with a couple a bands on it, I do not have this camera so not sure if the settings are right or wrong but a good first image

Pat

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree.

The histogram is very useful for balancing gain and exposure.  I tend to select the exposure to get the frame rate I'm after, then adjust the gain to get a suitable histogram.  If that means the gain is much getting over 60% then I may well think about increasing the exposure time.  It is all a bit "touchy feely" though.

Focus is, well, practice and more practice really.  Motorised focusers help enormously because there's no wobble when the focuser is moving.  It made a huge difference when I made one for the 127 Mak and I'm in the process of making one for my PST before doing one for the C9.25.  I seem to have done well with motor focusers.  Despite the two mounting brackets they're supplied with I've had to make a bespoke bracket for all of mine :)

James

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree.

The histogram is very useful for balancing gain and exposure.  I tend to select the exposure to get the frame rate I'm after, then adjust the gain to get a suitable histogram.  If that means the gain is much getting over 60% then I may well think about increasing the exposure time.  It is all a bit "touchy feely" though.

Focus is, well, practice and more practice really.  Motorised focusers help enormously because there's no wobble when the focuser is moving.  It made a huge difference when I made one for the 127 Mak and I'm in the process of making one for my PST before doing one for the C9.25.  I seem to have done well with motor focusers.  Despite the two mounting brackets they're supplied with I've had to make a bespoke bracket for all of mine :)

James

James - thanks for popping in! Are the required frame rates and histogram shapes trial and error or has a good starting point been established? I must invest in a motorised focusser one day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James - thanks for popping in! Are the required frame rates and histogram shapes trial and error or has a good starting point been established? I must invest in a motorised focusser one day.

I'd say the histogram is important to get close to right whether it's 70% or 80% won't kill you, but if you don't have enough dynamic range in the image then you'll be struggling for data to process.  Frame rate is up to you really, but anything between 30fps and 60fps is probably reasonable.  Fast is good, but requires more gain and gain means noise, so again it's something of a balancing act.

James

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree.

The histogram is very useful for balancing gain and exposure.  I tend to select the exposure to get the frame rate I'm after, then adjust the gain to get a suitable histogram.  If that means the gain is much getting over 60% then I may well think about increasing the exposure time.  It is all a bit "touchy feely" though.

Focus is, well, practice and more practice really.  Motorised focusers help enormously because there's no wobble when the focuser is moving.  It made a huge difference when I made one for the 127 Mak and I'm in the process of making one for my PST before doing one for the C9.25.  I seem to have done well with motor focusers.  Despite the two mounting brackets they're supplied with I've had to make a bespoke bracket for all of mine :)

James

i like to see the results of the motor for the 9.25 James, been thinking of trying to do something for my 8" sct without paying crazy money for a tailored motorised focuser,

as for you jupiter image, that certainly isn`t too bad, did you try the wavelets in registax to sharpen the detail any ?

my first effort with the mono asi 120 was about just as good as yours, i was trying the filters aswell to get a coloured image, you have to be quick, 30 seconds on each colour and i luminance with a manual filter wheel, very tricky L.O.L.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as for you jupiter image, that certainly isn`t too bad, did you try the wavelets in registax to sharpen the detail any ?

.

I did use the wavelets Red, but even with the top one at 100% it would not sharpen any more, which confused me somewhat and made me think I was out of focus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did have a go at capturing Mars but it appeared very very wobbly (fairly low in sky i know), perhaps something beyond my ability and equipment? But will try again! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i like to see the results of the motor for the 9.25 James, been thinking of trying to do something for my 8" sct without paying crazy money for a tailored motorised focuser,

I do have an external focuser on the C9.25 which should make things a little easier when it comes to motorising than my 127 Mak where I drive the focuser knob directly.  It's only a Revelation dual-speed R&P model though.

My experience with the Mak was that the mirror slop when changing focuser direction was enough at long focal lengths to take the image entirely off the sensor, but I didn't want to fit an external focuser there because the extra backfocus would have made the effective focal length too long for the Moon and Sun discs to fit on my DSLR sensor (perhaps I should get a full-frame camera :D

I'm unlikely to use the C9.25 for full disc lunar and solar though, so the external focuser removes the mirror problem and hopefully makes for a simpler motorisation mod as well.  I've started with the PST first though as I have the crayford focuser on that and there are at least screws to fit a bracket with.  The R&P model has a dearth of potential mounting points, so I need to engineer an alternative for that.

James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Played around with the wavelet sharpening option, although could do with a guide to be honest!

post-26268-0-56478700-1395701163.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Piero
      I'm currently on my annual leave in Italy and the sky has been clear all day with no air turbulence.
      The telescope is out - of course - and I managed a session before dinner.
      I thought about sharing some photos taken with my phone and a couple of sketches.
       


       



       
       
       
    • By MarsG76
      Jupiter imaged on 17 August 2019 using a C8 SCT, Skyris 618C at f33.
    • By MarsG76
      Hello All,
      Sharing with you my best images of Jupiter and Saturn for this year.
      I haven't had the luck of a High Pressure system with no wind speed yet, but on the 17th it was as close as I had for planetary this Jupiter/Saturn season.
      Not my best images of the gas giants ever but ok IMO.
      I'm happy to see that the GRS seems to be repairing itself, last time I imaged Jupiter, the border around the GRS looked like it was breaking up so perhaps it'll be around long enough for my kids to see in the eyepiece.
      Captured at f33. Images consist of  the best 15% frames from 13x60sec @ 60fps for Jupiter and 13x120s @ 30fps for Saturn, derotated in WinJupos.
      Clear Skies,
      MG
       


    • By PH-R
      Hey all, I just started imaging the planets again after a long break. I have just purchased some new equipment a ZWO ASI224MC and skywatcher ADC (replacement for SPC900). I have read a lot about image quality depending on the height of the planets. The image shows top row images I took in Dec 2012 SPC900 ( looks like the world did not end 🙂 ) and bottom row July 2019 224MC. Would the difference I am seeing in quality be down to just position or am I not setting the new camera correctly? Thanks for any more image examples or help.

    • By PH-R
      Hey all, I cannot believe my luck. I was out on the 31st July practicing imaging Jupiter and Saturn with the my new ADC and ZWO Asi224MC. All of a sudden the ISS started to appear from the South West heading East. I quickly released the clutches on the mount and followed the ISS the best I could with the finder scope. Everything was set in sharp cap for the Jupiter capture, ROI was set to 320 x 240, 2x barlow plus ADC.  I could not believe it out of 6500 frames I manged to find 13 frames, which I stacked. Second bit of luck, PIPP said it could not find an object, so I turned the option off and it ran without errors. The hero was AutoStakkert which sorted the frames to the front of the ser file. 
      Composite of 3 images from my night:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.