Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_android_vs_ios_winners.thumb.jpg.803608cf7eedd5cfb31eedc3e3f357e9.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, TareqPhoto said:

That's what making it as a nice one to have for fun more, BUT, i mentioned APO refractor, there are so many refractors APO and small, and many prefer to go with a refr than a newt, so keep that in mind too.

Well no pain no glory. But the results this thread shows with the SW130PDS have no competence at the price.

For refractors you have the ED72 around 300 euros, coupled with TS optics x0.79 reducer flatenner (+ 180 eur), I have one indeed, I plan to use the 332mm focal length of the ED72 for extended nebulosity zones that the SW130 cannot cover. Meanwhile keep looking the amazing work many do with this newt bargain imager.

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of results, here's what I could catch during my last september holidays in 3 nights — Yes I'm the multi-subject-per-night kind of man :-P.
Kind of tribute to this marvelous photon hoover :)
(details on separate pages in my gallery)

Night 1:

1585207440_20180901m31.thumb.jpeg.abfe8e4e10ebb929cba2f447955a362e.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

details M31

Night 2:

1181069159_20180907m8laguna.thumb.jpeg.9379cf0368ef0bf368885a5900511b60.jpeg 716912670_20180907m20trifid.thumb.jpeg.c2c07a75ce003fc363f0629fa0822843.jpeg 1849943417_20180907m17omega.thumb.jpeg.75b6443595a02adba71541207ea4bdc9.jpeg 932851802_20180907m16eagle.thumb.jpeg.c66d7eaa175507d3cb8bcf1d11360ae0.jpeg 424872514_20180907m33triangulum.thumb.jpeg.4d6e6dae47cf36e379cdc27c7ac0554f.jpeg

details M8 Laguna details M20 Trifid details M17 Omega details M16 Eagle details M33 Triangulum

Night 3:

1055379354_20180908m45pleiades.thumb.jpeg.c1c5330cc9811d1c6da31afd6b754ce7.jpeg 1076128434_20180908ghostsofgammacas.thumb.jpeg.2d737bec8bdd87d6c602038ce26ecdcc.jpeg

details M45 Pleiades details Gamma Cas

Unfortunately no clear night during christmas holidays -- apart the one before I leaved :(

PS: sorry if layout is messy, editor/preview was a bit hard on me...

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Susaron said:

They have less extreme versions as well which look really good. Their ONTC and UNC newts look great, but more expensive. Thanks for I decide I like these newts I might go for one of those one day. ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way guys,

I've been playing around with SGP autofocus options last two nights... it was cloudy/fogy and etc, so my experiments were not completed.

The best HFR result i managed to achieve was actually, initial result after I focused with Bahtinov, even before I started to play with autofocus settings.

My best score was around 1.3 HFR with Luminance (Baader).

and something around 1.2 HFR with HA (Baader 7nm), but it was already quite... cloudy... it probably can be better.

What's your best result? 

My motor step size is 2.4 microns (can adjust to 0.067, but as I noticed, even 2.4 is a bit too small for auto focus routine... probably... not sure yet.. but it was my first impression)

P.S. I am with ASI 16000MM-Pro and Skywatcher's CC (which is 0.9 reducer also).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 03/01/2019 at 21:42, jjosefsen said:

Yeah. I was just looking for a sanity check before going all Texas chainsaw on the thing. ?

Be careful I think 15mm is the max or else the end of focus tube will slip off the two rollers before it hits the stop , I inherited a 130pds when I bought my 200pds it had I think 20mm cut off and would slip off , best double check ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, bottletopburly said:

Be careful I think 15mm is the max or else the end of focus tube will slip off the two rollers before it hits the stop , I inherited a 130pds when I bought my 200pds it had I think 20mm cut off and would slip off , best double check ?

It all worked out. Got first proper light last night. ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick stack and a few tweaks in APP of the first light of my little 130pds, just to see what I got. :)

40x180s in luminance.

I did actually do 7x180s of R,G,B but all the bright stars are very green when I combine it.

I can see that the red master is very weak compared to the other two, so probably not enough data on it yet.

All in all I am encouraged by what I see, and hopefully this problem with the green is just a lack of data.

Pleiades-Luminance-quick.thumb.jpg.13808e4895d7c9bbce84765eec5f7fa7.jpg

Edited by jjosefsen
  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a lot of green in m45.

Try using one of the many techniques for balancing the channels.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said:

Not a lot of green in m45.

Try using one of the many techniques for balancing the channels.

 

Oh I know! ?

I tried a couple of different things, and I can knock it down in post processing. But I think it is just a matter of getting more data to be honest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(NOW RESOLVED HOPEFULLY)Help required I’m  after the offcut that gets cut off of the end of the draw-tube ,i inherited a 130pds but too much was cut off  literally 6mm too much ,looking to have offcut tac welded back on to stop focuser slipping off draw tube rollers, so if anyone can help, pm me please.

Edited by bottletopburly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, bottletopburly said:

Help required I’m  after the offcut that gets cut off of the end of the draw-tube ,i inherited a 130pds but too much was cut off  literally 6mm too much ,looking to have offcut tac welded back on to stop focuser slipping off draw tube rollers, so if anyone can help, pm me please.

Befor you weld, maybe you have some kind of extender?

As l recall one of us already had a similar problem, try asking him directly if he managed to sort it out.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've recently purchased this adapter:

http://www.opticstar.com/Run/Astronomy/Astro-Accessories-Imagers-Opticstar.asp?p=0_10_5_0_3_811

That will take about 10mm off the optical length. I'm using the Baader MPCCIII CC that will be mounted in the focuser with this part:

https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/accessories/adapters-imaging-accessories/astro-t2-system/baader-adapter-m36.4--t-2-(t-2-part-03).html

and various T2 extension tubes.

As the MPCCIII pushes the focus out by about 10mm anyway, I'm hoping that the additional 10mm taken off the optical path by the low profile T2-EOS adapter will take the end of the focuser tube out of the light path sufficiently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RolandKol said:

Befor you weld, maybe you have some kind of extender?

As l recall one of us already had a similar problem, try asking him directly if he managed to sort it out.

 

 

lol yeah that was me , I got another draw tube but not smooth enough, I think I may have sorted it I only need 8mm may have enough on replacement tube to knock a bit of end . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, bottletopburly said:

lol yeah that was me , I got another draw tube but not smooth enough, I think I may have sorted it I only need 8mm may have enough on replacement tube to knock a bit of end . 

Hahaha ;) ooopsy ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I finally got my 130PDS out again after not being able to use it since the middle of the summer as it got badly out of collimation and I just couldn't fix it.  

3 people tried to help at an Astro camp in October, but it still wasn't right.  Continued to try myself, but ended up taking it to RolandKol who kindly managed to sort it out for me.  

This was the test image a few nights ago.

Rosette_SHO.png

and a 2nd version with RGB stars added. 

Rosette_SHO_with_RGB_stars.png

Edited by carastro
  • Like 15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Picture from last year (29th December), with all the problems suffered that night, bad collimatio, bad focus, astigamtism, guiding. But I think is a good example of the field given by this scope. 20 x 180 subs with the QHY168C, in this "clusters soup" in Cassiopea. M103, C10, NGC654, NGC659, Trumpler 1 and Czernik 4.

Cheers.

Mario.

 

HT0p7_0p30Ms_tgv_curves_usm_resamp.jpg

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, bottletopburly said:

Help required I’m  after the offcut that gets cut off of the end of the draw-tube ,i inherited a 130pds but too much was cut off  literally 6mm too much ,looking to have offcut tac welded back on to stop focuser slipping off draw tube rollers, so if anyone can help, pm me please.

I superglued a little square of printed circuit board material on the flat to create a new stop. Works a treat.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

I superglued a little square of printed circuit board material on the flat to create a new stop. Works a treat.

I wasn’t sure if doing that the camera would reach focus , I assume it does then ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, bottletopburly said:

I wasn’t sure if doing that the camera would reach focus , I assume it does then ? 

It does here, with nearly 10mm to spare. Needs a short extension to work with an EP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said:

It does here, with nearly 10mm to spare. Needs a short extension to work with an EP.

Great that has saved me a job how much did you extend the stop by I’m assuming about 6mm 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, bottletopburly said:

Great that has saved me a job how much did you extend the stop by I’m assuming about 6mm 

Not sure, I just put it where it would just prevent the barrel dropping off the ball races.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Telescope: Skywatcher 130PDS
Mount: Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro StellarDrive 5
Camera: QHY 163M
Filters:Ha + O III + S II 
Exposure:

Ha (green channel):
24 X 300 sec

O III (blue channel):
24 X 300 sec

S II (red channel):
24 X 300 sec

Image data collected using: Sharpcap
Processed in Pixinsight and Photoshop CC

1634857071_NGC2244Narrowband_final.thumb.jpg.d89b40be81c2761f62a1e1ec2878253c.jpg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Always a bit tricky imaging under a bright moon, but even more so when you’re in clumsy mode. Last night I managed to disconnect the power from my mount whilst aligning. Twice! Then I dropped an eyepiece by slewing the scope without having it fixed properly (fortunately it landed on the rubber eye cup). Finally I spent ages trying to work out why I couldn’t focus my guide-scope until the penny finally dropped that I was twiddling with the locking ring and not the focuser. So I’m taking this picture as a victory of the scope over its owner!

15x 10 min subs – Canon 600d – 130 pd-s- 7nm Ha filter.

 

Rosette Ha 190116.jpg

  • Like 5
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Whistlin Bob said:

Always a bit tricky imaging under a bright moon, but even more so when you’re in clumsy mode. Last night I managed to disconnect the power from my mount whilst aligning. Twice! Then I dropped an eyepiece by slewing the scope without having it fixed properly (fortunately it landed on the rubber eye cup). Finally I spent ages trying to work out why I couldn’t focus my guide-scope until the penny finally dropped that I was twiddling with the locking ring and not the focuser. So I’m taking this picture as a victory of the scope over its owner!

15x 10 min subs – Canon 600d – 130 pd-s- 7nm Ha filter.

 

*IMAGE*

I wish my nights of "getting things a bit wrong" still ended in such a lovely image! Usually I just have cold hands and frustration to take to bed with me....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By jadcx
      Skywatcher 80 ED DS-Pro outfit including matched flattener and motor focus. Now only £350
      This kit gives you a great introduction to astronomy and imaging, which is why it's so popular.  You can see details over at FLO but there is:
      80 ED Ds-Pro OTA (Objective Lens Diameter: 80mm, Telescope Focal Length: 600mm,  f/7.5)
      SW Eyepiece (2"): 28mm
      2”/50.8mm Di-Electric Star Diagonal
      9x50 Finderscope
      Dual-Speed 11:1 2” Crayford Focuser (Backlash-Free)
      Supplied with Tube Rings & Mounting Plate - please note there is a longer black vixen type dovetail fitted, not the fancy new green short one you will see on the FLO site
      SW motor focus and fitting kit - I've never used this, hence it's not fitted (more details over on FLO)
      Dedicated SW 0.85x reducer/flattener (see FLO for more details)
      Aluminium Carrying / Shipping Case
       
      The RRP is over £720, so grab a bargain while you can.
      Collection from Nottingham, or DHL for £20 (within UK)



    • By tooth_dr
      I scrapped all the Oiii and Sii data I previously took during a full moon (about 15 hours worth) and retook it all when the moon was a bit smaller at 76%.  Ha was taken during 98% and 67% moon.  All the lights were taken on the following nights: 12th, 19th and 20th September 2019.
      Integration times, all in 600s subs unbinned:
      Ha = 28.33 hours
      Oiii= = 5.67 hours
      Sii = 5.67 hours
       
      The Ha data is really nice, and unsurprisingly the Oiii and Sii is not as strong (or nice).
      I'm missing that (vital) step in my processing routine of getting the Sii and Oiii properly stretched to match the Ha, before combining.  I dont really know how to deal with the weaker data properly.  Any pointers would be appreciated.
      What I do currently:
      All the data is loaded into APP into separate channels/sessions.
      The data is stacked and registered against the best Ha sub
      This produces individual stacks of Ha, Sii and Oiii that are all registered
      Each channel is processed with DPP in APP and then saved as a 16bit TIFF
      Each is opened in PS
      Stars removed with AA and any remnants removed and tidied up
      I then open a blank RGB document in PS
      I paste Ha into Green, Sii into Red and Oiii into Blue
      Adjust the selective colour settings to get 'Hubble palette'
      Adjust levels, curves, saturation until looks ok
      All the Ha Sii Oiii data is then combined together in a single 'super' stack in APP using quality weighted algorithm to create a 'luminance'
      That luminance layer is adjusted using levels, curves, and NC tools such as local contrast enhancement and deep space noise reduction (using masks to apply as required)
      The luminance is pasted onto the above colour layer, and incrementally added using gaussian blur
      Cropped and saved.
       
       
      Here it is anyway   I haven't intended on any more exposure time for this one, but will consider it, if the expert opinion dictates otherwise!
       
      CS
      Adam
       


    • By GiovanniF
      Hi to everyone, I used to do some astrophotography in the past with a Celestron AVX and DSLR but after few month had to give up for several reasons, including light pollution (I'm living in zone 3 east London), and also working shifts. Now I want to start again, and this time more serious. I've been searching around for a couple of months to choose all the gear and I'm quite happy with the list so far although it's a bit over the price I planned at first.
       I will get an William optics Z73 with his 50mm guide scope, a flattener/reducer 0.8, light pollution filter IDAS D2 and as camera I will use a Canon 600D modded and I will buy a ZWO 183MC Pro, after so much research, I'm very happy with the scale and framing I will get with this combo, but I'm starting to get confused with the mount.
      My first idea was to go for an HEQ5 Pro, as my previous experience with the AVX has been awful, then I realized that the FLO, sells that mount with belt modification and also some cleaning and tuning if required, I heard that it's a big improvement over the stock one and the price it's ok, but another important factor for me it's portability. Unfortunately, my garden doesn't allow me to do much so I will need to carry around on trolley, for a km walk, I'm a strong person and been doing plenty of time with the AVX, so my confusion came recently when the iOptron mounts entered my radar. I start comparing the heq5 pro with belt, with the iOptron cem25EC and the CEM40 without encoders, and I'm so unsure of which to buy, the cem25 seem to be the equivalent of heq5 at least speaking of payload, but in some threads I read people saying it's a bit fragile so kind of remove it from the equation although the weight it's interesting for my situation, then the cem40, seem to be quite similar on weight to the heq5 but with higher payload and that's interesting too as I will buy a C11 at some point.
      Now it will all come down to the accuracy of tracking I guess, how the heq5 and cem40 would compare on tracking and guiding? If the cem40 it's better, I would probably go with that since it holds more and would last longer as I don't plan to get anything bigger than a C11, but if the skywatcher it's better, I could decide to go for that, and when I move to a place with better garden then get a second mount with higher payload.
      Apologise for the long post and my english.
      Kind Regards,
      Giovanni. 
    • By Andy Cole
      Hi all
      I'm a newbie here but not totally new to astronomy. I've had a telescope since I was a teenager (over 30 years!) and only ever had 1 telescope - a Tasco 40x40mm reflector. I expect members my age are familiar with it - thin and white with a thin metal tripod and a push and pull focuser.  It's still functional at more than 30 years old although the thread on the eyepiece is worn so the eyepiece falls off regularly! I've only ever used it to look at the moon, Jupiter and Saturn and that's always been good enough for me.  Now I have been thinking of getting a new scope. I have a very limited budget and so I am wondering whether I will get any significant improvements on what I can see.
      My earliest memories of the Tasco from childhood were that I could see the rings of Saturn as a line across the circle of the planet.  Having rekindled my interest in the last few years, I have started to use it again, and nowadays, when Saturn is visible, I can clearly see the rings 'as a ring' and the gap between the planet and the rings, which I don't remember seeing as a kid. 
      Vieing Jupiter I can usually see about 4 moons.
      I've heard that the Skywatcher Heritage 130P Dobsonian is a good 'budget' telescope, and great for casual use, which is what appeals to me most.  I don't want a telescope with complicated setup or one that takes up a lot of space.  TheSkywatcher seems to fit the bill, and it also fits my very limited budget.
      What I am most interested to find out is whill I get an improved view of the things I have already experienced?  I have read some reviews that describe what you can see with this scope and it sounds like it's pretty much what I can already see. And it's maximum 65x magnification doesn't seem like much better than the Tasco's 40x. But will the wider aperture make a bigger difference than the magnification?
      I'm also interested to know if I could use this scope for basic astrophotography - I have numerous cameras - phone cameras, compacts and DSLR's (photohraphy is my main hobby).  I'm not talking about hour long exposures of dark sky objects, just what can be seen easily through this scope.
      I'd love to know what people's opinions are, especially if you own or have used this scope.  I'm also interested to hear recommendations for other scopes, but please remember I have limited budget and space.  I know that an 8" or more is better and I would love one but they are just too expensive and too large for me.
      Cheers
      Andy
    • By Mark Daniels
      Been looking for neat solution to taking small scope abroad using my stuff and not paying out for a dedicated set up. 
      Have a skywatcher finder which with a barlow and 90 * gives good results. I was looking at an Orion mini eq tabletop tripod but hard to get hold of. 
      Play a bit of music in a band and have a few microphone stands so got to work with a hack saw. 
      I used a mic holder as in photo they are about £3 and cut the holder part off and filed flat. Drilled hole through to accept large camera thread (£3 screw bolt)
      this allows shortened micstand to fit to the alt az mount. (Mic stand 15 of ebay. )
      the dovetail was expensive as i wanted green and got from germany £30 with couier the white finder bracket from tring harrisons £6
      so thats £60 but if i went for black dovetail less than £40  seeing i had mic stand already quite a cheap solition
      the stand is very stable and provided the telescope is moved clockwise when rotating freehand the threads stay tight  with the fine controls either direction works well
      overall wiegt is bit over 3 kg and will fit in a standard aluminium camera case 
      hope this if useful 
      Mark👍
       







×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.