Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2.thumb.jpg.7719b6f2fbecda044d407d8aba503777.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, TareqPhoto said:

That's what making it as a nice one to have for fun more, BUT, i mentioned APO refractor, there are so many refractors APO and small, and many prefer to go with a refr than a newt, so keep that in mind too.

Well no pain no glory. But the results this thread shows with the SW130PDS have no competence at the price.

For refractors you have the ED72 around 300 euros, coupled with TS optics x0.79 reducer flatenner (+ 180 eur), I have one indeed, I plan to use the 332mm focal length of the ED72 for extended nebulosity zones that the SW130 cannot cover. Meanwhile keep looking the amazing work many do with this newt bargain imager.

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of results, here's what I could catch during my last september holidays in 3 nights — Yes I'm the multi-subject-per-night kind of man :-P.
Kind of tribute to this marvelous photon hoover :)
(details on separate pages in my gallery)

Night 1:

1585207440_20180901m31.thumb.jpeg.abfe8e4e10ebb929cba2f447955a362e.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

details M31

Night 2:

1181069159_20180907m8laguna.thumb.jpeg.9379cf0368ef0bf368885a5900511b60.jpeg 716912670_20180907m20trifid.thumb.jpeg.c2c07a75ce003fc363f0629fa0822843.jpeg 1849943417_20180907m17omega.thumb.jpeg.75b6443595a02adba71541207ea4bdc9.jpeg 932851802_20180907m16eagle.thumb.jpeg.c66d7eaa175507d3cb8bcf1d11360ae0.jpeg 424872514_20180907m33triangulum.thumb.jpeg.4d6e6dae47cf36e379cdc27c7ac0554f.jpeg

details M8 Laguna details M20 Trifid details M17 Omega details M16 Eagle details M33 Triangulum

Night 3:

1055379354_20180908m45pleiades.thumb.jpeg.c1c5330cc9811d1c6da31afd6b754ce7.jpeg 1076128434_20180908ghostsofgammacas.thumb.jpeg.2d737bec8bdd87d6c602038ce26ecdcc.jpeg

details M45 Pleiades details Gamma Cas

Unfortunately no clear night during christmas holidays -- apart the one before I leaved :(

PS: sorry if layout is messy, editor/preview was a bit hard on me...

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Susaron said:

They have less extreme versions as well which look really good. Their ONTC and UNC newts look great, but more expensive. Thanks for I decide I like these newts I might go for one of those one day. ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way guys,

I've been playing around with SGP autofocus options last two nights... it was cloudy/fogy and etc, so my experiments were not completed.

The best HFR result i managed to achieve was actually, initial result after I focused with Bahtinov, even before I started to play with autofocus settings.

My best score was around 1.3 HFR with Luminance (Baader).

and something around 1.2 HFR with HA (Baader 7nm), but it was already quite... cloudy... it probably can be better.

What's your best result? 

My motor step size is 2.4 microns (can adjust to 0.067, but as I noticed, even 2.4 is a bit too small for auto focus routine... probably... not sure yet.. but it was my first impression)

P.S. I am with ASI 16000MM-Pro and Skywatcher's CC (which is 0.9 reducer also).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 03/01/2019 at 21:42, jjosefsen said:

Yeah. I was just looking for a sanity check before going all Texas chainsaw on the thing. ?

Be careful I think 15mm is the max or else the end of focus tube will slip off the two rollers before it hits the stop , I inherited a 130pds when I bought my 200pds it had I think 20mm cut off and would slip off , best double check ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, bottletopburly said:

Be careful I think 15mm is the max or else the end of focus tube will slip off the two rollers before it hits the stop , I inherited a 130pds when I bought my 200pds it had I think 20mm cut off and would slip off , best double check ?

It all worked out. Got first proper light last night. ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick stack and a few tweaks in APP of the first light of my little 130pds, just to see what I got. :)

40x180s in luminance.

I did actually do 7x180s of R,G,B but all the bright stars are very green when I combine it.

I can see that the red master is very weak compared to the other two, so probably not enough data on it yet.

All in all I am encouraged by what I see, and hopefully this problem with the green is just a lack of data.

Pleiades-Luminance-quick.thumb.jpg.13808e4895d7c9bbce84765eec5f7fa7.jpg

Edited by jjosefsen
  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a lot of green in m45.

Try using one of the many techniques for balancing the channels.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said:

Not a lot of green in m45.

Try using one of the many techniques for balancing the channels.

 

Oh I know! ?

I tried a couple of different things, and I can knock it down in post processing. But I think it is just a matter of getting more data to be honest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(NOW RESOLVED HOPEFULLY)Help required I’m  after the offcut that gets cut off of the end of the draw-tube ,i inherited a 130pds but too much was cut off  literally 6mm too much ,looking to have offcut tac welded back on to stop focuser slipping off draw tube rollers, so if anyone can help, pm me please.

Edited by bottletopburly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, bottletopburly said:

Help required I’m  after the offcut that gets cut off of the end of the draw-tube ,i inherited a 130pds but too much was cut off  literally 6mm too much ,looking to have offcut tac welded back on to stop focuser slipping off draw tube rollers, so if anyone can help, pm me please.

Befor you weld, maybe you have some kind of extender?

As l recall one of us already had a similar problem, try asking him directly if he managed to sort it out.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've recently purchased this adapter:

http://www.opticstar.com/Run/Astronomy/Astro-Accessories-Imagers-Opticstar.asp?p=0_10_5_0_3_811

That will take about 10mm off the optical length. I'm using the Baader MPCCIII CC that will be mounted in the focuser with this part:

https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/accessories/adapters-imaging-accessories/astro-t2-system/baader-adapter-m36.4--t-2-(t-2-part-03).html

and various T2 extension tubes.

As the MPCCIII pushes the focus out by about 10mm anyway, I'm hoping that the additional 10mm taken off the optical path by the low profile T2-EOS adapter will take the end of the focuser tube out of the light path sufficiently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RolandKol said:

Befor you weld, maybe you have some kind of extender?

As l recall one of us already had a similar problem, try asking him directly if he managed to sort it out.

 

 

lol yeah that was me , I got another draw tube but not smooth enough, I think I may have sorted it I only need 8mm may have enough on replacement tube to knock a bit of end . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, bottletopburly said:

lol yeah that was me , I got another draw tube but not smooth enough, I think I may have sorted it I only need 8mm may have enough on replacement tube to knock a bit of end . 

Hahaha ;) ooopsy ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I finally got my 130PDS out again after not being able to use it since the middle of the summer as it got badly out of collimation and I just couldn't fix it.  

3 people tried to help at an Astro camp in October, but it still wasn't right.  Continued to try myself, but ended up taking it to RolandKol who kindly managed to sort it out for me.  

This was the test image a few nights ago.

Rosette_SHO.png

and a 2nd version with RGB stars added. 

Rosette_SHO_with_RGB_stars.png

Edited by carastro
  • Like 15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Picture from last year (29th December), with all the problems suffered that night, bad collimatio, bad focus, astigamtism, guiding. But I think is a good example of the field given by this scope. 20 x 180 subs with the QHY168C, in this "clusters soup" in Cassiopea. M103, C10, NGC654, NGC659, Trumpler 1 and Czernik 4.

Cheers.

Mario.

 

HT0p7_0p30Ms_tgv_curves_usm_resamp.jpg

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, bottletopburly said:

Help required I’m  after the offcut that gets cut off of the end of the draw-tube ,i inherited a 130pds but too much was cut off  literally 6mm too much ,looking to have offcut tac welded back on to stop focuser slipping off draw tube rollers, so if anyone can help, pm me please.

I superglued a little square of printed circuit board material on the flat to create a new stop. Works a treat.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

I superglued a little square of printed circuit board material on the flat to create a new stop. Works a treat.

I wasn’t sure if doing that the camera would reach focus , I assume it does then ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, bottletopburly said:

I wasn’t sure if doing that the camera would reach focus , I assume it does then ? 

It does here, with nearly 10mm to spare. Needs a short extension to work with an EP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said:

It does here, with nearly 10mm to spare. Needs a short extension to work with an EP.

Great that has saved me a job how much did you extend the stop by I’m assuming about 6mm 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, bottletopburly said:

Great that has saved me a job how much did you extend the stop by I’m assuming about 6mm 

Not sure, I just put it where it would just prevent the barrel dropping off the ball races.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Telescope: Skywatcher 130PDS
Mount: Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro StellarDrive 5
Camera: QHY 163M
Filters:Ha + O III + S II 
Exposure:

Ha (green channel):
24 X 300 sec

O III (blue channel):
24 X 300 sec

S II (red channel):
24 X 300 sec

Image data collected using: Sharpcap
Processed in Pixinsight and Photoshop CC

1634857071_NGC2244Narrowband_final.thumb.jpg.d89b40be81c2761f62a1e1ec2878253c.jpg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Always a bit tricky imaging under a bright moon, but even more so when you’re in clumsy mode. Last night I managed to disconnect the power from my mount whilst aligning. Twice! Then I dropped an eyepiece by slewing the scope without having it fixed properly (fortunately it landed on the rubber eye cup). Finally I spent ages trying to work out why I couldn’t focus my guide-scope until the penny finally dropped that I was twiddling with the locking ring and not the focuser. So I’m taking this picture as a victory of the scope over its owner!

15x 10 min subs – Canon 600d – 130 pd-s- 7nm Ha filter.

 

Rosette Ha 190116.jpg

  • Like 5
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Whistlin Bob said:

Always a bit tricky imaging under a bright moon, but even more so when you’re in clumsy mode. Last night I managed to disconnect the power from my mount whilst aligning. Twice! Then I dropped an eyepiece by slewing the scope without having it fixed properly (fortunately it landed on the rubber eye cup). Finally I spent ages trying to work out why I couldn’t focus my guide-scope until the penny finally dropped that I was twiddling with the locking ring and not the focuser. So I’m taking this picture as a victory of the scope over its owner!

15x 10 min subs – Canon 600d – 130 pd-s- 7nm Ha filter.

 

*IMAGE*

I wish my nights of "getting things a bit wrong" still ended in such a lovely image! Usually I just have cold hands and frustration to take to bed with me....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Saj_37uk
      Looking for the 2" low profile extension tube that is provided with most of the skywatcher scopes. I have a used 190MN that didn't come with the extension tube and need it to get accurate focus. 
       
      I believe Orion scopes may have one too.
    • By fifeskies
      The weights from my NEQ6 are beginning to look scruffy.
      Is there a good colour match car type spray that anyone would recommend for sprucing them up.
    • By Rhushikesh-Canisminor
      Posting in this forum after too long!
      One of the first attempts at taking photos of the moon.
      All photos taken using skywatcher 90mm refractor with eq2 mount, Nikon DSLR and 2x Barlow here and there.
      No exposure.
      Basic editing in cellphone.
      Thank you! Suggestions highly appreciated!




    • By Greg6498
      Hello all!
      I just picked up a Skywatcher Evostar 80mm Doublett and LX70 (EQ5) mount. This is my first refractor and EQ mount so it took me a while to put it together (if you all notice anything out of place please tell me!). I still enjoy my 8” dob but wanted to learn. This type of scope. It had good reviews for general viewing, but I'm not sure what to expect. 
      The EQ mount took quite some time to figure out and one of my questions is do I operate the scope with the counterweight horizontal to the ground? I noticed that in that position I can use the control cables to move up and down and left and right. Any advice is appreciated!


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.