Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_celestial_motion.thumb.jpg.a9e9349c45f96ed7928eb32f1baf76ed.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

Thought perhaps it's time my 130pds made it's contribution to the thread that caused its purchase...

Taken on 28/29 October:

Image: 17x539s Subs in Halpha (Baader 7nm) , 21x 300s subs in RGB, + flats, darks & bias.  Stacked in DSS, Processed in Pixinsight.

Kit: 130pds, HEQ5, Canon 600d (modified) , SW Coma Corrector, ZWO 224 on Finder/Guider using PHD2

 

Pelican_HaRGB 181029.jpg

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"If you see Ghosts"

Composition of the C4-NGC7023 Iris Nebula with vdB141 The Ghost Nebula in Cephei.
3hours of 300s subs from La Mancha fields in Spain (Bortle 4 skies) at Gain 10, Offset 30, Temp -10C.

Equipment the usual:
SW130PDS+AZEQ5+QHY168C+Optolong L-Pro+Baader MPCC+ASI 385MC for guiding. Captured with APT and PHD2 for guiding. As with the Pacman nebula, my main mirror shows some astigmatism, and also the collimation was not perfect.
Postprocessed with Pix.
Regards.

Mario.

Iris_and_Ghost.jpg

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

A quick update on my mount issue progress:

I found a 2nd hand NEQ6 which I've bought and got set up with the 130PDS. Hopefully it will be able to give good results as soon as the skies clear! :) The mount seems in very good shape, although there was a bit of dec backlash which ive removed. The real test will be when I try guiding, though. ? 

This is the mount next to the old EQ5.

WIN_20181105_16_48_28_Pro.thumb.jpg.6f6ce8826bb0791f3e245d583fd21f53.jpg

The Setup.

IMG_2831.thumb.JPG.1a419d70dee69038dea3d880ac6212f8.JPG

IMG_2833.thumb.JPG.be96d9c2f2127d311716633346116a30.JPG

John

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, JohnSadlerAstro said:

Hi,

A quick update on my mount issue progress:

I found a 2nd hand NEQ6 which I've bought and got set up with the 130PDS. Hopefully it will be able to give good results as soon as the skies clear! :) The mount seems in very good shape, although there was a bit of dec backlash which ive removed. The real test will be when I try guiding, though. ? 

This is the mount next to the old EQ5.

The Setup.

John

Nice Duplet! :)

Don't you afraid camera to fall off in such a position? 
I want to place my ASI1600 like this to make a better balance.... but I AFRAID! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always found my focuser on the 130 solid and hang off my 1600 and sx filter wheel from it in that orientation.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest ive never thought of it dropping off...?I suppose I could put the strap around the scope. The focuser is very sturdy, as spillage says. I also use the MPCC which is designed for this kind of focuser, so there is an indented ring around it for the focuser screws to lock into. :) 

John

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, JohnSadlerAstro said:

To be honest ive never thought of it dropping off...?I suppose I could put the strap around the scope. The focuser is very sturdy, as spillage says. I also use the MPCC which is designed for this kind of focuser, so there is an indented ring around it for the focuser screws to lock into. :) 

John

Haha :) never paid attention to it! :)
My SW CC also has it :)

thanks! 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, RolandKol said:

Nice Duplet! :)

Don't you afraid camera to fall off in such a position? 
I want to place my ASI1600 like this to make a better balance.... but I AFRAID! :)

The tube will not fall out if that is what you are worried about, it is physically impossible. You just have to make sure that you have tightened the thumb screws sufficiently and it will not move. 

I hang a ASI1600MM pro and wheel from mine without any fear. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I added some more time and had about 5 different attempts at stacking & processing various combinations of my data. I also got hold of Astronomy Tools v1.6 for Photoshop and took matt_baker's advice on final tweaks in Lightroom.

All in all I'm quite pleased with this considering my inexperience and the (I think) quite poor raw data I had (lots of LP, high cloud, etc.).

Thanks for the encouragement and help on this forum guys!

 

Messier 31 (Andromeda Galaxy) with Messiers 32 and 110 (AGAIN!)

 

Messier 31 (Andromeda Galaxy) with Messiers 32 and 110
2018-10-30 & 2018-11-02, Didcot, England
 

Gear:
Skywatcher 130-PDS with 0.9x coma corrector (585 mm, f/4.5)
Skywatcher NEQ6-Pro Synscan
Canon EOS 550D (unmodified) and Skywatcher 2" LP filter
ZWO ASI120-MC guide camera
Skywatcher Startravel 80 guide scope


Acquisition & Processing:
- AstrophotographyTools (APT) and PHD2 guiding with dithering
- 34 x 300s = total 170 minutes @ ISO 800
- 2x20 flats, 16 library darks, library bias
- Stacked in DeepSkyStacker and post-processed in Photoshop CC 2018 (with Gradient Xterminator + Astronomy Tools v1.6)

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be very gratefull if you could post a picture or screenshot with the parameters you use in APT to control dithering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Susaron said:

I will be very gratefull if you could post a picture or screenshot with the parameters you use in APT to control dithering.

Hi Susaron - I'm at work at the moment but I'll try and get the settings from my laptop when I get home tonight. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Susaron said:

I will be very gratefull if you could post a picture or screenshot with the parameters you use in APT to control dithering.

Here you go! I am not an expert at all but once everything's guiding with PHD2 I have these settings in APT and set it to dither every 2 images. It seems to work for me at least. I also use a 60 second gap between exposures in APT because I used to have some problems with the dither step taking a while, but I'm not sure if that's overkill or not. It usually doesn't make too much difference when I'm on 300 second subs though so I've left it that way.

 

Clipboard01.jpg

Edited by sagramore
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I hope this kind of post is allowed and I'm not seen to be spamming!

I have recently done a lot of re-processing of old data using the advice of people in here. The main difference is having obtained Astronomy Tools v1.6 for Photoshop and matt_baker's advice to touch up in Lightroom as a final step. I think it shows quite a leap in the quality of the images and also made me realise just how much skill there is involved in the post-processing of the data (even more so when the data is as dodgy as mine often is... haha).

Anyway, these are all taken using the 130PDS and an unmodified Canon 550D DSLR. They are all using 300 s guided subs (with dithering) via APT and PHD. I hope you like them. I'm quietly pleased with myself :)

 

M31 Before:

Messier 31 (Andromeda Galaxy) with Messiers 32 and 110

M31 After (also with a bit more data added, so not perhaps a 100% direct processing comparison):

Messier 31 (Andromeda Galaxy) with Messiers 32 and 110 (AGAIN!)

 

 

M42 Before:

Great Orion Nebula (M42, M43) and Running Man Nebula (NGC 1973/5/7)

M42 After:

Great Orion Nebula (M42, M43) and Running Man Nebula (NGC 1973/5/7)

 

M51 Before:

Messier 51 - Whirlpool Galaxy

M51 After:

Messier 51 - Whirlpool Galaxy

 

EDIT TO ADD: I also have some old data of M1 and of M81/M82 however the new processing hasn't been quite as successful yet. I still need some more attempts at those before I share again! 

Edited by sagramore
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, sagramore said:

So I hope this kind of post is allowed and I'm not seen to be spamming!

Not at all! If you are imaging with a 130pds then post away.

Do though feel free to start your own thread if you are looking for specific advice or want to show results. It's very easy for things to just get lost in these very long threads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Another quick update, I got the NEQ6 out in a gap between the big Atlantic showers this evening. I did a quick PA with the polarscope and then went through a 3 star alignment which worked really well. I then got 5 frames each on M33 and NGC891. Im planning to get autoguiding up and then get some proper data on 891 later this week if the weather becomes at all cooperative. 

Noise in this "target preview" is obviously atrocious, as its only 5 mins at ISO1600! :D Hopefully with 5 hours it will be better. ;) I didnt bother to guide, so there is also some trailing. I've processed in B/W as the noise is too bad in colour. My plan is to rotate 90 degrees and centre on the bright star above the galaxy to get the nearby Abell in as well.

NGC891.thumb.jpg.2f632750eb30406d3bafff783d872661.jpg

John

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

A recent (August) 130pds image of M33 with an ASI 1600mm-c.   

The image is LRGB with the red channel enhanced with Ha

 

m33_130pds_1600_LRGB1_CT_LHE_Csat_crop_ctmore_denoise.thumb.jpg.bf24a603cef2b6c262667dd6a456fab3.jpg

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another M33. On SW 130pds, HEQ5 and Canon 600d with IDAS D2 Filter.

50x5 min subs + flats, dark and bias.

Still a bit noisy, but very pleased with it.

M33_181111.jpg

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Whistlin Bob said:

Still a bit noisy, but very pleased with it.

Nice one.

Astra Image would do a good job of controlling that sort of noise.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Double Cluster in Perseus.

130PDS, HEQ5 and Nikon D3200

48/60x90s subs + flats, dark and bias.

Was pretty windy last night so 12 subs got thrown out. Guiding was okay at best, about 0.80RMS total

It was a 63% moon, so I decided to picture this jewel box of a cluster instead of re-doing my Pleiades pic

doublecluster_cropped.thumb.jpg.0f0db596f83ad2ba439e8e9dacab3c07.jpg

Edited by matt_baker
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These cloudy days I am reprocessing some of the 2018 SW130PDS "Greatest Hits", as long as I am increasing the knowledge on the tricks of PixInsight.

Here I leave you some of the pics.

Cheers.

Mario.

 

M92_60d_final.jpg

M5_wtmrk.jpg

C14_NGC884_NGC869.jpg

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful stuff. I'm partial to globular clusters, and these examples are prime. I repeat myself below.

Edited by Seanelly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Susaron said:

These cloudy days I am reprocessing some of the 2018 SW130PDS "Greatest Hits", as long as I am increasing the knowledge on the tricks of PixInsight.

Here I leave you some of the pics.

Cheers.

Mario.

 

M92_60d_final.jpg

M5_wtmrk.jpg

C14_NGC884_NGC869.jpg

Very nice. I'm partial to globular clusters, and these are prime examples.

Edited by Seanelly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By AstroRuz
      Skywatcher 150/1200 f8 planetary Newtonian.
      Bought this originally intending to set up a planetary rig but circumstances call for sale.
      Will come with eyepieces and a collimation eyepiece. Not used by myself and has seen very little use. Mirrors in good condition
      Collection only
      £50



    • By AstroRuz
      £180
      Selling a nice portable wide telescope with great glass and a great field of view
      I have two telescopes and I'm using the 80ED more currently and so this Telescope just isn't getting used anymore
      It has a longer dovetail (originally from the 80ED) so declination balance can be reached.
      Great performer for the price
      Collection only as P&P is like £40 (Northamptonshire - UK)
      Selling to fund a scope or mount upgrade.🤔
      Selling





    • By jadcx
      Skywatcher 80 ED DS-Pro outfit including matched flattener and motor focus. Now only £350
      This kit gives you a great introduction to astronomy and imaging, which is why it's so popular.  You can see details over at FLO but there is:
      80 ED Ds-Pro OTA (Objective Lens Diameter: 80mm, Telescope Focal Length: 600mm,  f/7.5)
      SW Eyepiece (2"): 28mm
      2”/50.8mm Di-Electric Star Diagonal
      9x50 Finderscope
      Dual-Speed 11:1 2” Crayford Focuser (Backlash-Free)
      Supplied with Tube Rings & Mounting Plate - please note there is a longer black vixen type dovetail fitted, not the fancy new green short one you will see on the FLO site
      SW motor focus and fitting kit - I've never used this, hence it's not fitted (more details over on FLO)
      Dedicated SW 0.85x reducer/flattener (see FLO for more details)
      Aluminium Carrying / Shipping Case
       
      The RRP is over £720, so grab a bargain while you can.
      Collection from Nottingham, or DHL for £20 (within UK)



    • By tooth_dr
      I scrapped all the Oiii and Sii data I previously took during a full moon (about 15 hours worth) and retook it all when the moon was a bit smaller at 76%.  Ha was taken during 98% and 67% moon.  All the lights were taken on the following nights: 12th, 19th and 20th September 2019.
      Integration times, all in 600s subs unbinned:
      Ha = 28.33 hours
      Oiii= = 5.67 hours
      Sii = 5.67 hours
       
      The Ha data is really nice, and unsurprisingly the Oiii and Sii is not as strong (or nice).
      I'm missing that (vital) step in my processing routine of getting the Sii and Oiii properly stretched to match the Ha, before combining.  I dont really know how to deal with the weaker data properly.  Any pointers would be appreciated.
      What I do currently:
      All the data is loaded into APP into separate channels/sessions.
      The data is stacked and registered against the best Ha sub
      This produces individual stacks of Ha, Sii and Oiii that are all registered
      Each channel is processed with DPP in APP and then saved as a 16bit TIFF
      Each is opened in PS
      Stars removed with AA and any remnants removed and tidied up
      I then open a blank RGB document in PS
      I paste Ha into Green, Sii into Red and Oiii into Blue
      Adjust the selective colour settings to get 'Hubble palette'
      Adjust levels, curves, saturation until looks ok
      All the Ha Sii Oiii data is then combined together in a single 'super' stack in APP using quality weighted algorithm to create a 'luminance'
      That luminance layer is adjusted using levels, curves, and NC tools such as local contrast enhancement and deep space noise reduction (using masks to apply as required)
      The luminance is pasted onto the above colour layer, and incrementally added using gaussian blur
      Cropped and saved.
       
       
      Here it is anyway   I haven't intended on any more exposure time for this one, but will consider it, if the expert opinion dictates otherwise!
       
      CS
      Adam
       


    • By GiovanniF
      Hi to everyone, I used to do some astrophotography in the past with a Celestron AVX and DSLR but after few month had to give up for several reasons, including light pollution (I'm living in zone 3 east London), and also working shifts. Now I want to start again, and this time more serious. I've been searching around for a couple of months to choose all the gear and I'm quite happy with the list so far although it's a bit over the price I planned at first.
       I will get an William optics Z73 with his 50mm guide scope, a flattener/reducer 0.8, light pollution filter IDAS D2 and as camera I will use a Canon 600D modded and I will buy a ZWO 183MC Pro, after so much research, I'm very happy with the scale and framing I will get with this combo, but I'm starting to get confused with the mount.
      My first idea was to go for an HEQ5 Pro, as my previous experience with the AVX has been awful, then I realized that the FLO, sells that mount with belt modification and also some cleaning and tuning if required, I heard that it's a big improvement over the stock one and the price it's ok, but another important factor for me it's portability. Unfortunately, my garden doesn't allow me to do much so I will need to carry around on trolley, for a km walk, I'm a strong person and been doing plenty of time with the AVX, so my confusion came recently when the iOptron mounts entered my radar. I start comparing the heq5 pro with belt, with the iOptron cem25EC and the CEM40 without encoders, and I'm so unsure of which to buy, the cem25 seem to be the equivalent of heq5 at least speaking of payload, but in some threads I read people saying it's a bit fragile so kind of remove it from the equation although the weight it's interesting for my situation, then the cem40, seem to be quite similar on weight to the heq5 but with higher payload and that's interesting too as I will buy a C11 at some point.
      Now it will all come down to the accuracy of tracking I guess, how the heq5 and cem40 would compare on tracking and guiding? If the cem40 it's better, I would probably go with that since it holds more and would last longer as I don't plan to get anything bigger than a C11, but if the skywatcher it's better, I could decide to go for that, and when I move to a place with better garden then get a second mount with higher payload.
      Apologise for the long post and my english.
      Kind Regards,
      Giovanni. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.