Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_4.gif.6a323659519d12fc7cafc409440c9dbf.gif

Imaging with the 130pds


Russe
 Share

Recommended Posts

Looks pretty nifty.... Im impressed!  Its much the same thing for bashing a 130p into imaging.

However, you will definitely need to make a cover for the bottom of the tube now, because there will be a substantial light leak around the edges of the primary.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Uranium235 said:

Looks pretty nifty.... Im impressed!  Its much the same thing for bashing a 130p into imaging.

However, you will definitely need to make a cover for the bottom of the tube now, because there will be a substantial light leak around the edges of the primary.

Thanks Rob. That was my inspiration although the PDS cell is a better design which made it a lot simpler.

I can get focus and the draw tube isn't intruding at all. I probably have 5mm out focus left at most. Cover is my next job along with a third locking screw in the focuser collar.

Noticed some coma in this 30s of Archturus. What are your thoughts on it?

Disappointing. I shouldn't need to play around with spacing surely?

Single__2016-01-28_05-11-30_0003_ISO800_

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, richyrich_one said:

Thanks Rob. That was my inspiration although the PDS cell is a better design which made it a lot simpler.

I can get focus and the draw tube isn't intruding at all. I probably have 5mm out focus left at most. Cover is my next job along with a third locking screw in the focuser collar.

Noticed some coma in this 30s of Archturus. What are your thoughts on it?

Disappointing. I shouldn't need to play around with spacing surely?

Single__2016-01-28_05-11-30_0003_ISO800_

That looks more like internal reflections than coma to me.

Welcome to the world of worrying about second-order effects ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, richyrich_one said:

Are you referring to the uneven halo (only way I can describe it) around Archturus itself?

I was. But now I had a chance to look at the full size image, I agree with you that it looks like a touch of coma. Sorry about that.

Have you got the spacing between the CC and the sensor correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pompey Monkey said:

I was. But now I had a chance to look at the full size image, I agree with you that it looks like a touch of coma. Sorry about that.

Have you got the spacing between the CC and the sensor correct?

No worries. :smiley:

Camera+T-ring+MPCC

What could possibly go wrong? 

I'll have to double check everything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many of you are successfully using smaller mounts with the 130pds?

I can afford a 130pds but not a new mount which means using it on my exos2 (EQ5). Now everyone seems to say that the mount is the first thing you must get right and I'm not going to disagree with that but I can't afford an HEQ5 right now. So how successfully can one use an exos2 (eq5) / 130pds combination?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 28 January 2016 at 07:18, richyrich_one said:

Thanks Rob. That was my inspiration although the PDS cell is a better design which made it a lot simpler.

I can get focus and the draw tube isn't intruding at all. I probably have 5mm out focus left at most. Cover is my next job along with a third locking screw in the focuser collar.

Noticed some coma in this 30s of Archturus. What are your thoughts on it?

Disappointing. I shouldn't need to play around with spacing surely?

Single__2016-01-28_05-11-30_0003_ISO800_

The star issues seem to be across the entire frame, you need to check the following:

Collimation

CC Spacing

Whether the corrector and camera is seated in the drawtube correctly (no slop or tilt).

Also, was the shot taken with any guiding? Becuause trailing can occur easily in 30s if unguided - the smaller stars close to Arcturus give the game away (as theyre all eggy in the same direction).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 28/01/2016 at 17:51, Thalestris24 said:

Hi

T-ring could cause problems - make sure it's the recommended one!

Louise

Thanks Louise

Recommended one? Hope you aren't referring to the Baader one at £54 :eek:

Are there cheaper 'recommended' ones?

9 hours ago, Uranium235 said:

The star issues seem to be across the entire frame, you need to check the following:

Collimation

CC Spacing

Whether the corrector and camera is seated in the drawtube correctly (no slop or tilt).

Also, was the shot taken with any guiding? Becuause trailing can occur easily in 30s if unguided - the smaller stars close to Arcturus give the game away (as theyre all eggy in the same direction).

Thanks Rob

I agree there is trailing, can't remember whether it was guided or not now. I hope not! The coma to me seems uneven, most noticable top left corner and a bit bottom right may be. I have since added a third thumb screw to the draw tube so that may help. Something I did discover, keep the thread protector(ring with the writing printed on it) on as although it doesn't affect the spacing it does keep the thumscrews niclely in the undercut on the MPCC rather than half on the shoulder and it gives you a nice flush face to mate with the draw tube. I think overall it looks better in this image with the third thumbscrew fitted but still with possible spacing issues.

Stacked and processed in PI, still learning the ropes so ignore the hot pixels. Obviously guided but stars still don't look tight to me though.:sad2:

20 x 300s

M45.thumb.jpg.1dd8e19c173560d28e9ce232b8

The T-Ring I have has an inner threaded ring held in with grub screws, it is possible that this wasn't set correctly and or unevenly set. I've had a play with it and got the dimension from the mating face on the cammera side to the mating face on the CC side to 10.8 mm all round. This, with what I believe the sensor distance from the camera mating face to be 44.5mm, gives me a total of 55.3mm. This should be in the sweet spot as far as I know.

Pretty sure collimation was good but will confirm, still a bit of a dark art to me to be honest. Going to be stripping it down to flock it and fit a secondary heater while the weather is pants so when that's all done and the skies clear I'll give it another go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, richyrich_one said:

Thanks Louise

Recommended one? Hope you aren't referring to the Baader one at £54 :eek:

Are there cheaper 'recommended' ones?

Thanks Rob

I agree there is trailing, can't remember whether it was guided or not now. I hope not! The coma to me seems uneven, most noticable top left corner and a bit bottom right may be. I have since added a third thumb screw to the draw tube so that may help. Something I did discover, keep the thread protector(ring with the writing printed on it) on as although it doesn't affect the spacing it does keep the thumscrews niclely in the undercut on the MPCC rather than half on the shoulder and it gives you a nice flush face to mate with the draw tube. I think overall it looks better in this image with the third thumbscrew fitted but still with possible spacing issues.

Stacked and processed in PI, still learning the ropes so ignore the hot pixels. Obviously guided but stars still don't look tight to me though.:sad2:

20 x 300s

M45.thumb.jpg.1dd8e19c173560d28e9ce232b8

The T-Ring I have has an inner threaded ring held in with grub screws, it is possible that this wasn't set correctly and or unevenly set. I've had a play with it and got the dimension from the mating face on the cammera side to the mating face on the CC side to 10.8 mm all round. This, with what I believe the sensor distance from the camera mating face to be 44.5mm, gives me a total of 55.3mm. This should be in the sweet spot as far as I know.

Pretty sure collimation was good but will confirm, still a bit of a dark art to me to be honest. Going to be stripping it down to flock it and fit a secondary heater while the weather is pants so when that's all done and the skies clear I'll give it another go.

The cc spec is 55mm +/- 1mm. I seem to recall that using a low profile t-ring can give the wrong spacing. Looking at your last image I don't think you have coma now but, yes, can see a lot of hot pixels! Yeah, sometimes t-rings seem to have a tendency to fall apart - very annoying!

Louise

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just had a closer inspection of it, and the coma seems worse on the right hand side of the image. That would suggest some tilt in the imaging plane, as a short term solution you can focus your telescope with a star placed on that side of the frame (not centrally placed), that should help balance out the field a bit.

I noticed a fair smattering of hot pixels too, but oddly - they dont seem to be travelling in the same direction across the frame. Its almost as if they are subject to a rotational pattern... was your PA good enough? or did you rotate the camera at all during the shoot?

 

Edit: The presence of coma on the right side may suggest that the spacing or placement of the corrector (in the drawtube - ie: tilt) is too close. Fortunately, the Baader does have some tolerance, so you can increase the spacing in steps of 0.5mm if possible (mine turned out to be 57.5mm). You will know when you have gone too far becuase the coma distortion will become a radial distortion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marginally off topic ...

Is there a great advantage (or any advantage at all for that matter) to getting a 150pds or orion optics VX6 over a 130 pds. My wife asked me if it would be worth getting something better when I talked about the 130pds. I notice the OTA weight for the VX6 is 4.5 Kg so it's barely more than the 130pds and with an option of 1/10 wave mirrors. The 1/10 wave might not be warranted under our skies but it suggests that the overall quality _might_ be better

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DarkKnight said:

Some pretty impressive shots here.

Is the 130P-DS now discontinued, and if so, what is it's replacement?

Definitely not discontinued, possibly just not available in Australia. The smallest astrophotography reflector appears to be the 150P-DS http://www.skywatcheraustralia.com.au/product/bkp150-otaw-dual-speed-d-150mm-f-750mm/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jnb said:

Marginally off topic ...

Is there a great advantage (or any advantage at all for that matter) to getting a 150pds or orion optics VX6 over a 130 pds. My wife asked me if it would be worth getting something better when I talked about the 130pds. I notice the OTA weight for the VX6 is 4.5 Kg so it's barely more than the 130pds and with an option of 1/10 wave mirrors. The 1/10 wave might not be warranted under our skies but it suggests that the overall quality _might_ be better

 

Hint:

Dont get a VX6, 1/10 wave optics make no difference when it comes to DSO imaging ;)

If you want a 6" get the 150pds - or if you want the wider field (for large nebs) get the 130pds. When it comes to small newts, Skywatcher have got it licked.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Uranium235 said:

Just had a closer inspection of it, and the coma seems worse on the right hand side of the image. That would suggest some tilt in the imaging plane, as a short term solution you can focus your telescope with a star placed on that side of the frame (not centrally placed), that should help balance out the field a bit.

I noticed a fair smattering of hot pixels too, but oddly - they dont seem to be travelling in the same direction across the frame. Its almost as if they are subject to a rotational pattern... was your PA good enough? or did you rotate the camera at all during the shoot?

 

Edit: The presence of coma on the right side may suggest that the spacing or placement of the corrector (in the drawtube - ie: tilt) is too close. Fortunately, the Baader does have some tolerance, so you can increase the spacing in steps of 0.5mm if possible (mine turned out to be 57.5mm). You will know when you have gone too far becuase the coma distortion will become a radial distortion.

I didn't spot that with the hot pixel direction!

No camera rotation so likely the PA is not great. Need to check that again as well. PHD does seem to have to correct north/south as well as east/west. Not experienced enough to know what it should be doing if everything is setup well.

Since tweaking the T-Ring it's likely I've increased the spacing a little so just waiting on a clear sky.

I do appreciate your time and experience:)

Love to get this sorted and get some proper imaging done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Cornelius Varley said:

Definitely not discontinued, possibly just not available in Australia. The smallest astrophotography reflector appears to be the 150P-DS http://www.skywatcheraustralia.com.au/product/bkp150-otaw-dual-speed-d-150mm-f-750mm/

Cheers Peter.

I came across this one locally ... Sky-Watcher BKP 130 OTAW Dual Speed, which looks identical to the 130P-DS  ....   http://www.sirius-optics.com.au/astrophotography/astrophotography-optical-tube-assemblies/skywatcher-130-650-photo-reflector.html

The specs read the same so it may be the 'down-under' version although it doesn't appear on the local SkyWatcher site.

Edited by DarkKnight
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DarkKnight said:

Cheers Peter.

I came across this one locally ... Sky-Watcher BKP 130 OTAW Dual Speed, which looks identical to the 130P-DS  ....   http://www.sirius-optics.com.au/astrophotography/astrophotography-optical-tube-assemblies/skywatcher-130-650-photo-reflector.html

The specs read the same so it may be the 'down-under' version although it doesn't appear on the local SkyWatcher site.

The specs are the same.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone share the picture taken with that scope but without coma corrector? I will be probably getting 130pds today but not enough money for the CC at the moment so jus by curiosity wnat to see if lack of CC will cause drama on the picture and how much of FOV will be not affected. Not much more money there is a 150pds which is not my target due to relative big focal lenght but on the other hand i believe it will give more of FOV not affected without the CC ?

Edited by Kirien
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Kirien said:

Can anyone share the picture taken with that scope but without coma corrector? I will be probably getting 130pds today but not enough money for the CC at the moment so jus by curiosity wnat to see if lack of CC will cause drama on the picture and how much of FOV will be not affected. Not much more money there is a 150pds which is not my target due to relative big focal lenght but on the other hand i believe it will give more of FOV not affected without the CC ?

Depending on what camera you are using (chip size), you will have about a 50% useable field - maybe a bit less (ie: you will end up cropping half of it out) without a coma corrector. It will get real ugly towards the corners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By fifeskies
      It was my intention to fit a Rowan Belt upgrade kit to this mount but I have now purchased the EQ6-R model with the belt drive already built in, so this mount is ready to find a new home.
       
      Mount is in very good condition having been kept indoors and was my main mount so got used often rather than sitting around unused.
      Synscan Goto system handset, polarscope fitted to the mount.
      The current model, with the new green trim is on FLO.
      Sky-Watcher NEQ6 PRO Go-To Astronomy Mount | First Light Optics    
      £1239 new       
      For sale at £795  (new price less 38%)

       
       
      The mount head is the newer version that takes both the narrow Vixen and the wider Losmandy style bar. 
      The Skywatcher matched tripod has the larger 2 inch legs which gives better stability.  However I tended to use the mount on my fixed garden pier rather than the tripod.
      The original poorly designed altitude adjustment bolts have been upgraded for far superior ones, (original bolts also included).
       
       
      A free 13.8V DC power supply will be included at this price which gives better stability than the compact mains power brick (mains power brick is also included).
      Collection only as too heavy to freight, I can look into delivery for the cost of petrol within a 1 hour drive from Fife.
       
       
      I used it with a range of Refractor and Newtonian telescopes.
      It handles heavy scopes very well and is rated up to 25Kg for visual and 18Kg for astrophotography.
      I have not pushed it to the upper limits but have imaged with a dual refractor rig on it at 14Kg.
      For visual the largest I used was a 10inch carbon fibre Newtonian, which came in at 18kg with finder and Telrad attached.
      Mount comes with the standard 2x 5.1kg counterweights and the counterweight extension bar for high loads. A few minor paint flecks on the edge of the counterweights, (does anyone have counterweights without a few paint flecks?).
      The mount has been used for astrophotography with an astromodified D600 Canon DSLR. Some examples of the results are attached so you can see just how good the tracking is on this mount.
       I used APT software with PHD2 guiding using an adapter cable from FLO, cable not included.
       
      With good polar alignment (I use Sharpcap) I was able to run exposure subs of 480 seconds (8 mins), so have been able to image some nice DSO targets.
       
      The attached images taken using this mount show stacked subs with minimal processing.
       
      I am happy to have anyone thinking of buying the mount drop by so I can demonstrate the system up and running for them.
       (COVID precautions taken).
       
      This is a heavy mount so bear that in mind if you are considering purchase, 23.5 kg for the mount/tripod without the 2 x 5.1kg counterweights. (33.7Kg with).
      Not so much “grab and go” more “hug and stagger”.
      OK for a few metres out to garden but you will need to break it down for any longer move.
       


       



       
       

    • By fifeskies
      This is a handy accessory that plugs into the Synscan handset (before you power on). As the mount initialises it reads the GPS from the “mouse” so you do not need to enter the position manually. It also adds date and time for you.
      Very useful if you use several observing sites.
      Once read the GPS mouse can be unplugged and used for another mount (very handy for star parties).
      Works with Sky-Watcher SynScan V3/4/5 Synscan handsets 
      (requires V3.32 firmware or later)
      Current V3 firmware is 3.39 , Current V4/V5 firmware is 4.39
      You can update firmware for the Synscan handset from the Skywatcher support site to ensure compatibility is you are still on older version firmware.

       
       
      Sensor uses GPS to automatically locate and input the users position (Latitude/Longitude) to the handset.            
      Note not suitable for use with a PC. 
      As my mount is now in a fixed position on my garden pier I have no use of this little gadget, since I have a fixed Lat/Long, so I am offering it for sale to someone who can make better use of it.
      On FLO and listed at £119
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/sky-watcher-mount-accessories/skywatcher-gps-mouse.html
      For sale at  £70 (a discount of 41% from list price)
      + £4.95 recorded delivery  

      Free collection from Fife with COVID precautions.

      I had this working on my EQ6-R, (the first photo above shows it on the EQ6-R handset.)
      It should be compatible with many other Skywatcher mounts but check before you buy.

      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/user/manuals/sky-watcher_gps_mouse_manual.pdf
       

      Has a magnetic base, but there is now a Velcro pad as a more secure fix which reduces the magnetic effect, will still cling onto my metal pier but slides on a rounded tripod leg. 
      Apart from the Velcro pad the mouse is in as new condition
      Either peel off the Velcro pad, or better still get a matching Velcro pad to stick onto the position you plan to keep it (pads available Amazon or eBay). 
      Though in fact you can remove the mouse once GPS position has been read and pack it away.

       
       


    • By tompato
      So I have had these Skywatcher Slow Motion Cables for all of 5 minutes and after the damn thing fell off the a second time in as many minutes I tightened it better and the screw sheared off. Fantastic. Any ideas? Drill it out I guess? Send angry correspondence to Skywatcher.
      Its now stuck to my Scopetech Mount Zero.

    • By Maideneer
      For the life of me, I cannot figure this out.  Got to take out my setup last night for only the second time as it's been cloudy for weeks and I've been trying in vain to align my Skywatcher AZ-GTi mount to no avail.  I'm using it in ALT-AZ mode for now, and I've probably researched every article and watched every Youtube vid I could find and still nothing is working...I feel like I'm stupidly dense or something because there is something just not clicking in the cranium.
      I thought I was supposed to point the dang thing north to start so that's what I did, err, I think anyway.  Am I pointing the wrong end north? See picture.  Also, I'm reading that the actual scope has to be mounted a certain way on the mount correct?  Which way would that be?  I've read all of this left/right stuff and those directionals mean nothing to me as it depends on someone's viewpoint.  When I aimed north to start, I attempted to align by directing SynScan to go to the Moon first, and that took it so far off course it wasn't even close, it was basically pointing at the ground.  I reset and tried again with another start (Vega I believe)...again, wasn't even in the realm of close.  I made sure my location settings were correct in the app so that wasn't the issue.
      Here's how I got something to "work".  I had it track to the moon and when it was essentially pointing at the ground and who knows how many degrees from my actual target, I picked the whole thing up, turned it around, manually aligned to the moon and then clicked OK on the app.  I felt like a ridiculous clown doing that but somehow it actually managed to do the trick but something tells me that isn't right on a long term basis.
      I'm thinking about getting SkySafari to control the mount but I should probably master the basics first.
      Tips/tricks appreciated.

    • By Geordie mc
      Skywatcher illuminated reticule eyepiece. It has a red crosshair pattern. I think it’s 24mm rather than the newer 12.5mm models. Great condition. Looking for £35 including postage from France. Thanks.
       



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.