Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep3_banner.thumb.jpg.5533fb830ae914798f4dbbdd2c8a5853.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

I just made a solar filter (Baader Astrosolar 5.0) for my 130pds :grin: Nice little job for a Sunday afternoon. Hope to get a chance to use it in the coming week. I tried last year with the ST-80 but could never get sharp focus. I thought it was either me or the scope but it eventually turned out that I hadn't removed the clear plastic film - d'uh! So more hopeful this time :) I made it from some leftover original foam packaging from the scope and some cardboard plus a glue gun - real Blue Peter stuff! It has a net aperture of 120mm so just under F6. Can see the sun through it quite clearly by eye :)

Louise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 130pds on the way and have come by some bobs knobs thanks to the generosity of another member.

they are the standard skywatcher ones. will they fit.

if so which ones go in which holes. I only have the primary mirror screws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im guessing theyre for the secondary? They should be the same size thread (I think all SW are the same at the secondary support) so shouldnt be a problem.

They will be going in the three little holes that surround the secondary holder centre screw (do not loosen that one unless you know what youre doing). Dont forget to remove the old screws first! Also, the telescope will need re-collimating once youve fitted them - but to reduce the upset to the secondary, its probably better to replace them one by one (ie: take one out, put the new one in & tighten it up, move on to the next).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 130pds army continues to grow..... :D

I have returned to the 130p ds club, but most of my imaging will be video cam with a little 1000D thrown in

First job will be to add a motor drive to the focuser

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 130pds army continues to grow..... :D

And yet, still no appearances in Skywatcher/OVL magazine ads...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, we've had some good weather.... but not much darkness to play with. However, Cygnus was high enough to do a bit more work last night.

This is just a rough process (was pretty tired by end of session), and is just half the resolution of the finished item. I'll give it the proper U235 treatment later on and post in the imaging subforum - unless its clear again, in which case I might have a stab at grabbing some OIII (depending how high the moon is).

post-5513-0-87054800-1433577261_thumb.jp

  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mate, when I get a bit of free time later on I'll have a proper look at it. Its only been through half of the normal process, and I'd like to find a way of turning down NGC7000 a bit - its quite bright so I dont want it to unbalance the image when I push the data harder (layer masks to the rescue!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With all the good weather last month I managed to grab some data on the Tulip nebula with the 130pds and Canon 1100d

20 x 300sec rgb

10 x 600sec Ha

All subs captured at iso1600, and my first attempt at combining ha data with rgb.

post-3186-0-11290000-1433762212_thumb.pn

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I added my images to the Deep Sky Imaging section, but thought I would add my M81 and M82 attempt to show that even someone relativity new to the scope and Astrophotography can get a half decent from this excellent scope.

post-3939-0-77336300-1434371961_thumb.jp

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My latest project the Western Veil Nebula.

Two panes of Ha, 5Hours 30Minutes on each pane.

post-11689-0-74232700-1434410267_thumb.j

Capturing OIII (currently at approx 3 Hours on each pane) aiming for 5 hours+.

This was captured in my back garden, with no astronomical darkness, in the light pollution of Stoke-On-Trent and a LED streetlight peering over my garden wall.

The processing errors are all my own :grin:

Can't wait for the darkness to return, eyeing up the Elephant's trunk nebula next. Think it may even fit on a single pane :Envy:

Rob

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My latest project the Western Veil Nebula.

Two panes of Ha, 5Hours 30Minutes on each pane.

attachicon.gifHA_Mosaic.jpg

Capturing OIII (currently at approx 3 Hours on each pane) aiming for 5 hours+.

This was captured in my back garden, with no astronomical darkness, in the light pollution of Stoke-On-Trent and a LED streetlight peering over my garden wall.

The processing errors are all my own :grin:

Can't wait for the darkness to return, eyeing up the Elephant's trunk nebula next. Think it may even fit on a single pane :Envy:

Rob

That gives me hope for my Black Country garden... now to sort out daily tiredness... (why does it always seem clearer on a work night, or just after a beer or two? [emoji15] )

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

back to the lagoon :)

this time it was at almost the zenith and i think the LP was much lower where it was.

54x30s subs, again no calibration frames.

this is a crop to cut the coma around the corners.

post-37532-0-32942800-1434721211_thumb.j

Frank

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a version of NGC6940 taken at the beginning of May with the modded 1100d. It's just 3 x 600s. I have lots more data but, erm, my flats didn't seem to match... :embarrassed: I'll have to investigate...

Stacked in dss with flats, darks and bias frames. Just for fun I processed in Gimp and I decomposed into separate red, green and blue and adjusted and stretched each separately. I figure this is a bit like mono rgb processing? Unfortunately the current dev version of Gimp has a problem with (re)composing the rgb image so I had to revert to the older non-16bit stable version. Still, it was interesting to do (on a cool, cloudy day).

post-33532-0-11150300-1434732682_thumb.p

Louise

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a version of NGC6940 taken at the beginning of May with the modded 1100d. It's just 3 x 600s. I have lots more data but, erm, my flats didn't seem to match... :embarrassed: I'll have to investigate...

Stacked in dss with flats, darks and bias frames. Just for fun I processed in Gimp and I decomposed into separate red, green and blue and adjusted and stretched each separately. I figure this is a bit like mono rgb processing? Unfortunately the current dev version of Gimp has a problem with (re)composing the rgb image so I had to revert to the older non-16bit stable version. Still, it was interesting to do (on a cool, cloudy day).

Louise

Added some more data (7x600s total) and made it less red / more blue (and stretched a bit more):

post-33532-0-76660300-1434792787_thumb.p

Edit: Maybe not so good...

Edited by Thalestris24
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

back to the lagoon :)

this time it was at almost the zenith and i think the LP was much lower where it was.

54x30s subs, again no calibration frames.

this is a crop to cut the coma around the corners.

attachicon.giflagoon crop.jpg

Frank

Here was I thinking that looked like it was in my range (30s untethered dslr), but then considered your location and skies compared to mine!

Awesome image all the same, and still hope for me yet, albeit a different object... [emoji16]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, Jim

i guess you can get a similar result, how's your LP?

i'll try taking a short exposure to show how it is in here, it's ok mostly to the south and east too, but north and west is much more light polluted.

please post your results when you take them.

Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My LP is shocking! But its a deal.

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Wizard Nebula, the imaging session was delayed when a required cable repair was spotted, so only 6 HA exposures of 600 seconds.  

get.jpg

Cheers
Ross

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sun was out this morning :cool2: so had a go with some solar imaging today :) Just in white light but also had a quick go with some standard NB filters. I wasn't expecting them to have any effect but there may be some subtle differences - or could just be quality variation? All taken with a fs modded Canon 1100d fitted with a cls-ccd. I preprocessed in Pipp (1500 x 1500) and stacked the best ones in Registax 6.

Anyway, here you go:

First - plain white light:

post-33532-0-17724700-1435081071.png

Using Baader 7nm Halpha:

post-33532-0-72255800-1435081017.png

Using Baader OIII:

post-33532-0-25880700-1435081089.png

Using Baader SII:

post-33532-0-44403900-1435081115.png

Hmm... I obviously need some flats too but not sure how to do them for solar? I'd have posted in the Solar forum but was too embarrassed by the dust bunnies... :embarrassed:

Louise

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sun was out this morning :cool2: so had a go with some solar imaging today :) Just in white light but also had a quick go with some standard NB filters. I wasn't expecting them to have any effect but there may be some subtle differences - or could just be quality variation? All taken with a fs modded Canon 1100d fitted with a cls-ccd. I preprocessed in Pipp (1500 x 1500) and stacked the best ones in Registax 6.

Hmm... I obviously need some flats too but not sure how to do them for solar? I'd have posted in the Solar forum but was too embarrassed by the dust bunnies... :embarrassed:

Louise

hi Louise just take a couple of pics with a white t shirt over the lens or a white  tissue just so there is no detail then. like a flat . but at 1/260th iso (so it looks the same brightness ) then open photo shop then open the stacked frame and the single frame you just made, make sure they are both same size and color depth and file type (tiff - grey/rgb - 8 bit/16 bit) then select the sun pic and at the top goto image apply image subtract opacity 100 - scale 1 - offset 50. that should get rid of you dust bunnies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is subtle difference between them but I think for me just by a smidge is the Baader OIII closely followed by the first.

Is this the sun spot causing the Aurora for us?

Did you crop the image or does it fill the frame like that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Louise just take a couple of pics with a white t shirt over the lens or a white  tissue just so there is no detail then. like a flat . but at 1/260th iso (so it looks the same brightness ) then open photo shop then open the stacked frame and the single frame you just made, make sure they are both same size and color depth and file type (tiff - grey/rgb - 8 bit/16 bit) then select the sun pic and at the top goto image apply image subtract opacity 100 - scale 1 - offset 50. that should get rid of you dust bunnies. 

Ok, will try that next time if I can find something suitable to cover the 130pds+solar filter.

Thanks :)

Louise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is subtle difference between them but I think for me just by a smidge is the Baader OIII closely followed by the first.

Is this the sun spot causing the Aurora for us?

Did you crop the image or does it fill the frame like that?

Hiya

So maybe the OIII adds a little contrast. Well, solar flares cause auroras several days later but I don't know if there's any link to today's sunspots. I'll have to look in the solar section to see if anyone caught the offending flare!

The original frames are auto-cropped to 1500x1500 by Pipp, then I reduced the stacked output image by 50% so the posted ones are half actual size.

Louise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By c4llum83
      Thought people may like to see my recent custom design for my SkyWatcher Heritage 130p... 
      As a big Apollo misson geek, and not being a fan of the stock astronomer names wrap on the 130p, I decided to get creative. 
      I used a great moon wall sticker just £6 from Ikea (https://www.ikea.com/gb/en/p/kinnared-decoration-stickers-moon-00448463/) as well as some matt vinyl stickers from Redbubble, one for each Apollo mission patch. 
      Below is pics of the mod in progress and the end result - would love to hear what you think!


    • By NeilDMunro
      Hi,
      I have been attempting to update my SynScan V3 Hand Controller from V3.08 to latest version. Handset bootloader is V1.7.
      Unfortunately I just get the message “Can not connect to SynScan hand control”. I have looked at numerous forums and tried everything that has been suggested (including older versions of firmware installer), but getting nowhere.
      I am using a Skywatcher SynScan USB Adapter (purchased from Bristol Cameras) and installed the driver from the Skywatcher website. The adapter shows in the COM ports and says it is working properly.
      I have tried different computers (Win10 and XP) with no joy.
      Can anyone help, or is there anyone in North Aberdeenshire that has successfully updated their handset willing to give mine a go (once travel restrictions, etc ease)?
      Thanks
    • By Crignog
      Hi! I'm very new to astronomy and have ordered a SkyWatcher StarQuest 130p as my first telescope, which arrives soon. As I understand it the tripod is the biggest weak link in the setup. Is it possible for me to buy a replacement, better tripod to improve my viewing experience overall?
       
      Apart from the tripod what would you recommend upgrading?
       
      Thanks!
    • By Gevorg
      Hello!
      I am trying to setup the Skywatcher MC 102/1300 SkyMax BD AZ-S GoTo telescope+mount.
      What I did:
      Start from parking mode. The telescope is aligned to north. Turned it on and aligned with 2 stars. During the alignment the tracking is turning on all the time and moving the telescope position. Then when I try to go to some star the north/south motion never ends. While the East/West motion stops at right location. This is really wild to me. Can someone help with understanding what is the problem ?
       
      Thanks,
      Gevorg.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.