Jump to content

Novice Challenge

Imaging with the 130pds


Russe

Recommended Posts

On 15/05/2023 at 14:38, Astro_by_sona said:

do you think I need a primary mirror clip mask?

 

 

 

Hi, nice setup!

its an easy and cheap but effective tuning for better star shapes and less halo. I bought mine at a shop from austrian astro youtuber Daniel Nimmervoll (liquidart-shop). Its a high quality 3D print in mat black with perfect fit and minimal intrusion in the optical path. (mat is optional for 6 euro)

Another easy fix is to cover the back of your scope with a swimming cap to reduce light gradients.

To reduce risk of tilting its recommended to replace the 2 screws at the 2" adapter wtih nylon tipped screws. Ideally make a third hole for evenly applied pressure. (i dont know where to get those nylon screws though, im wondering that myself)

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/04/2023 at 11:44, Space Oddities said:

This focuser from Artesky is sadly only compatible with the 150P-DS and bigger, but not the 130P-DS due to the lack of a notch on the 130P-DS (just above the stickers, on the picture above).

The other reason maybe the curvature of the OTA as well, so worth checking this too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
On 15/05/2023 at 13:38, Astro_by_sona said:

do you think I need a primary mirror clip mask?

Sorry to hear about your personal loss.

Ref spikes, I would say its down to personal preference on how much diffraction is acceptable for you? The mirror clip mask should reduce the spikes in the centre, and in order to make the large spikes pointy(er) you would need to straighten the vanes.

Also bear in mind that its not often that you are going to image a star as bright as Vega 🙂

Nice mount, btw 🙂

Edited by AstroMuni
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 17/05/2023 at 18:57, AstroMuni said:

Sorry to hear about your personal loss.

Ref spikes, I would say its down to personal preference on how much diffraction is acceptable for you? The mirror clip mask should reduce the spikes in the centre, and in order to make the large spikes pointy(er) you would need to straighten the vanes.

Also bear in mind that its not often that you are going to image a star as bright as Vega 🙂

Nice mount, btw 🙂

Thanks for your response and the condolences.

I love the spikes so that's something I look forward too, my concern was reflection of the primary mirror in the brightness of Vega.

I do have a mirror mask made, will try with it.  Yes I'm very happy with cem40 ☺️

Cheers! Clear Skies!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/05/2023 at 04:18, Bibabutzemann said:

Hi, nice setup!

its an easy and cheap but effective tuning for better star shapes and less halo. I bought mine at a shop from austrian astro youtuber Daniel Nimmervoll (liquidart-shop). Its a high quality 3D print in mat black with perfect fit and minimal intrusion in the optical path. (mat is optional for 6 euro)

Another easy fix is to cover the back of your scope with a swimming cap to reduce light gradients.

To reduce risk of tilting its recommended to replace the 2 screws at the 2" adapter wtih nylon tipped screws. Ideally make a third hole for evenly applied pressure. (i dont know where to get those nylon screws though, im wondering that myself)

 

 

 

 

Thanks! Yes am very happy with the setup so far🤞 you never know in this hobby what will be your next purchase😆.

I do have a primary mirror mask 3D printed will use it, and have been hearing a lot about  the swimming cap, will get one!

I have already invested in a three screws adapter, it holds the imaging train quiet well.

Thanks so much for your time, clear skies!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thought this might be useful, I had an idea for a dew shield. 
 

so popped to Screwfix and got a few things, a 150mm pipe connector and a 150mm pipe. 
 

These happen to fit perfectly inside the front of the 130pds. 
 

Course all needs a proper build, flocking, gluing bits together etc etc.  

Also… it’s cheap!

Basically, the pipe connector is a snug fit into the front of the 130pds tube, and the pipe goes on the end of that. 

IMG_2659.jpeg

IMG_2653.jpeg

IMG_2652.jpeg

IMG_2655.jpeg

IMG_2656.jpeg

IMG_2657.jpeg

IMG_2658.jpeg

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/06/2023 at 22:08, gaz81 said:

Thought this might be useful, I had an idea for a dew shield. 
 

so popped to Screwfix and got a few things, a 150mm pipe connector and a 150mm pipe. 
 

These happen to fit perfectly inside the front of the 130pds. 
 

Course all needs a proper build, flocking, gluing bits together etc etc.  

Also… it’s cheap!

Basically, the pipe connector is a snug fit into the front of the 130pds tube, and the pipe goes on the end of that. 

 

This is *genius*. As someone who spent "astronomy gear" level cash for the wrong-sized dew shield and then was too disorganised to send it back for a refund, I've just been persevering without one. This, however, looks like it's far closer to my budget...

I guess the question though is whether or not flocking it out costs a lot... I have no experience with that either. Although I do need to install a mirror clip mask so maybe while the scope is disassembled I should look at flocking the main tube too. Do people find it makes a large difference?

Then again, I've had a belt mod for my NEQ6 sitting in the box for nearly a year because I've not found time (and the courage) to install it so maybe none of this will ever get done....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi everyone

Not much 130pds activity recently so, here's one from the current heatwave in south eastern Spain. We found some blue bits in the sea of red, aka Cygnus.

Thanks for looking and heat or no heat, don't forget your humble 130s.

ngc6914 apil siril 1.3.0a proc st 1.9.588b ~4h uhc

3-6914.thumb.jpg.1175c26028d861192870ab4cbed51997.jpg

 

 

Edited by alacant
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/03/2014 at 03:14, andre808 said:

Ok here goes, tonights M81 M82. 140 30 second subs with flats darks and bias. Not a patch on the excellent images displayed above but hey ho.

post-21095-0-69010400-1394507543_thumb.j

I think it's a pretty good image, well done, I find it's actually more about the process than the final image I enjoy the most, but seeing the results of one's efforts is absolutely amazing of course. Always gonna be people comparing, I think it's a great photo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello! Following this topic for a while, I have now a 130PDS as well and took a couple of pictures with it alongisde a Canon 100D ; L-enhance filter on a CEM25P mount. The upgrade I have on it are the spider vanes, disk around the primary, part of the insight flocked and focuser tube cut.

Here are the best pictures I took with it so far.

spacer.png14.thumb.png.2aeb7a3a9744e57b4515164ff506f3b2.png

I am very glad with the pictures but I really struggle with the mount so I would like to upgrade. I do travel some time to time to a dark site but I mainly image from my balcony in a bortle 7-8 zone. I don't plan to upgrade soon but if I do it would be for something like a 150P quattro on a mono camera.

Right now I will buy a 533mc pro which will gave me image scale of 1.25", so I should aim for an average guiding at 0.6 Rms. I am torn between the HEQ5 and the EQ6R - any advise would be welcome :)

 

Edited by RomainD
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.