Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, RolandKol said:

I guess, it also depends how primary is colimated... Full in or Full out and etc... Not yet figured out...

I find the collimation on my 130's secondary never seems to hold, as well. The number of times ive had to adjust it is really frustrating, especially as it always seems to end up a bit hit or miss as to whether I ever actually acheive anything like collimation! :D 

It's definitely worth pulling the primary down towards the back end of the tube though, the light spill is quite impressive if the mirrors all the way up. I use a couple of hats to keep the light out now.

John

Edited by JohnSadlerAstro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ngc 1893

40 x120s Ha,S,O.

This is my first attempt at narrowband  and only my second image with PI. Lots of issue and my monitor is bad so cannot really see any bad colours. It looks a bit red to me and the stars seem to have a ring around them.

 

 

ngc1893.jpg

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 30/03/2020 at 16:18, RolandKol said:

I am in the list of people who were not able to get a correct spacing with SW CC+ASI1600MM on 130PDS...
Standard ZWO rings were very close, but coma was present... With delrin spacers managed to reduce it, but not completely...

I guess, it also depends how primary is colimated... Full in or Full out and etc... Not yet figured out...

Hmm. Shouldn't depend on where the primary is.

Took me a  while to find this but I posted this back in December:

I've just taken some 'real world' measurements.

It looks to me that ZWO have supplied a pretty much optimal set of adaptors, assuming a standard 55mm back focus for the typical field flattener or coma corrector.

Without the EFW:

ASI1600 --->  21mm T2 adaptor** ---> female/female adaptor** ---> T2-48mm adaptor**

6.5mm + 21mm + 11mm + 16.5mm =   55mm

**supplied with ASI

 

With EFW:

ASI1600 --->  EFW --->  T2-T2 male/male adaptor* ---> female/female adaptor** ---> T2-48mm adaptor**

6.5mm + 19.97mm + 1.96 mm + 11mm + 16.5mm =   55.93mm

*supplied with EFW

**supplied with ASI

Allowing for ~0.7mm shortening of the light path by the filter, this is pretty close again at 55.2mm.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't been imaging for some time due to lack of clear skies, but got two good days in a row.

This is my latest image of the good old carina nebula  with about 5 hours of data processed with startools. I have a few more hours of previous data, but i'm getting some overlapping problems.

Forgive me for the huge coma around the corners, I gave up trying to use the gso coma corrector because the stars were looking better without it.

104608931_carinanebula31-03-2020.thumb.jpg.fbe5512a11fffe928e98d916bc3d533b.jpg

 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Atreta said:

Haven't been imaging for some time due to lack of clear skies, but got two good days in a row.

This is my latest image of the good old carina nebula  with about 5 hours of data processed with startools. I have a few more hours of previous data, but i'm getting some overlapping problems.

Forgive me for the huge coma around the corners, I gave up trying to use the gso coma corrector because the stars were looking better without it.

104608931_carinanebula31-03-2020.thumb.jpg.fbe5512a11fffe928e98d916bc3d533b.jpg

 

very nice

I can recommend the Baader MPCC if you are looking for a replacement. I have had very little issue getting it to work with both my 130PDS and my 200p

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This a rough process using pixinsight (slowly getting there maybe).

50 L x 120

20RGB x 120.

As always any pointers are welcome.

 

m101.jpg

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comet C/2019 Y4 ATLAS

120x60s @ISO800 / 10 dark, 30 flat, 50 bias

Individual frames calibrated in DSS. Processed and animated in Photoshop

Comet-C2019-Y4-ATLAS.gif

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dyfiastro said:

very nice

I can recommend the Baader MPCC if you are looking for a replacement. I have had very little issue getting it to work with both my 130PDS and my 200p

Thank you.

I'm considering saving up for the MPCC as it is well recommended in here.  One thing that i liked about the gso cc is that it increases the focal length and  so we have to rack the focuser outwards and this removes the Pacman effect on  bright stars. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, dyfiastro said:

the gso coma corrector

Really? Are you sure you had between 75 and 80mm cc to sensor? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, dyfiastro said:

I can recommend the Baader MPCC if you are looking for a replacement. I have had very little issue getting it to work with both my 130PDS and my 200p

+1....  I agree, the MPCC works well for me too. Mine needed a little bit of initial setting up (just a few test shots) to get the correct spacing but that was easy enough to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, alacant said:

Really? Are you sure you had between 75 and 80mm cc to sensor? 

I'll give a try with a larger spacer that i have, i remember to have tried with 75 and abou 77mm.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 29/02/2020 at 13:59, Stub Mandrel said:

Well done for coping with those lights! I use a 30mm long  'dewshield' made from camping mat lined with black flock; I bet if you used something like that you might see improved contrast.

Thanks for the suggestion, should work well ☺️

00100dPORTRAIT_00100_BURST20200401191925522_COVER.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, mAnKiNd said:

Thanks for the suggestion, should work well ☺️

00100dPORTRAIT_00100_BURST20200401191925522_COVER.jpg

Is that a home made or shop bought dew shield ? Looks tidy ! I'm using a DIY flocked camping mat at the moment.

I just bought an astrozap shield for my 200 PDS, it fits well and seems solid and well made, I'd like something similar for the 130 PDS if I could find it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Atreta said:

I'll give a try with a larger spacer that i have

OK. In fact anywhere between 70 and 80mm. You should find it superior to the two element ccs. Unfortunately we didn't try it on the 130 as we already had the gpu by then.

IIRC, on a 150 f5, it was just over 70mm.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Spaced Out said:

Is that a home made or shop bought dew shield ? Looks tidy ! I'm using a DIY flocked camping mat at the moment.

I just bought an astrozap shield for my 200 PDS, it fits well and seems solid and well made, I'd like something similar for the 130 PDS if I could find it.

Hey buddy, it's this one:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Astromania-Flexible-Dew-Shield-for-Telescope-Front-Outer-Diameter-from-148-167mm/324104286055?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649

 

Cheers,

Minos

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For anyone interested in fixing their star shapes (subject is Vega) from this to this:

1493653969_aperturemaskfix.thumb.jpeg.41f4a46a8416934e74ab60444098c1eb.jpeg

I designed a 3D print on tinkercad (.sti file attached)Skywatcher 130PDS Newtonian Primary Mirror Aperture Mask.stl, found a local 3D print shop to make it for me and applied to the mirror clips as such:

IMG_20200328_132955.thumb.jpg.6a3de9f418d62106b8eed7103f3c6c5c.jpg36876823_IMG_20200328_133018-Copy.thumb.jpg.bf176068ff4548b63102771071c8a6f7.jpgIMG_20200328_133048.thumb.jpg.624dc12be354baca03f724e0b2d3ae45.jpg

Inner diameter is 125mm, which is sufficient to cover the mirror edge and mirror clips. The idea is that the mask blocks the stray light from the edges, which causes the flares you see on bright stars and the ghost flares from the mirror clips blocking the edge flare.

Hope this helps :)

Minos 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nice, i might try that on a day as well

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Starfisher said:

nice, i might try that on a day as well

 

Go for it, it makes a big return for a very small cost. Just send the .sti file of the 3d design I made to your local shop to get it printed, then attach it to the primary in a centered fashion to hide the edges and clips and then done, star shapes fixed! :)

It also helps to sink your coma corrector further down the drawtube with spacers to avoid pacman stars. This way, when you maintain the correct distance of sensor to coma corrector, everything sinks further down and you have to focus outwards to reach the focal point.

Clear skies,

Minos

Edited by mAnKiNd
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 02/04/2020 at 16:41, mAnKiNd said:

For anyone interested in fixing their star shapes (subject is Vega) from this to this:

1493653969_aperturemaskfix.thumb.jpeg.41f4a46a8416934e74ab60444098c1eb.jpeg

I designed a 3D print on tinkercad (.sti file attached)Skywatcher 130PDS Newtonian Primary Mirror Aperture Mask.stl, found a local 3D print shop to make it for me and applied to the mirror clips as such:

IMG_20200328_132955.thumb.jpg.6a3de9f418d62106b8eed7103f3c6c5c.jpg36876823_IMG_20200328_133018-Copy.thumb.jpg.bf176068ff4548b63102771071c8a6f7.jpgInner diameter is 125mm, which is sufficient to cover the mirror edge and mirror clips. The idea is that the mask blocks the stray light from the edges, which causes the flares you see on bright stars and the ghost flares from the mirror clips blocking the edge flare.

Hope this helps :)

Minos 

This looks great but how did you align the secondary mirror with the primary when you put it back together, as you won't be able to see the mirror clips in the secondary anymore? It does look like a worthwhile mod though, just curious how you got around the collimation problem.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, cuivenion said:

This looks great but how did you align the secondary mirror with the primary when you put it back together, as you won't be able to see the mirror clips in the secondary anymore? It does look like a worthwhile mod though, just curious how you got around the collimation problem.

That indeed occured to me when I was collimating, but I could still see the inner rim of the 3d print well enough to be able to center the secondary so that the inner rim uniformly appeared concentric. Hope this makes sense! :) 

I also collimate the secondary with a glatter laser after using my cheshire, and then use the howie tublug for the primary. I use the parallizer also to keep all tools...well...parallel!

Edited by mAnKiNd
spelling
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Since we're on the subject of collimation, I'll share another neat little trick I use to ensure consistency when I attach my camera after performing a collimation routine. It involves female and male Canon EOS T-rings (Nikons would work too).

First, I use the female ZWO short EOS ring on the drawtube:

IMG_20200407_000009.thumb.jpg.cf80f96e44ab87553e198da7e1f4df8a.jpg

Second, I use a standard male EOS T-ring on the howie glatter parallizer, which allows me to snap it into the drawtube and use my collimation tools:

IMG_20200406_235954.thumb.jpg.f7ca5941f39c1087caf1afb9bfcf79be.jpg 

Like so:

IMG_20200407_000200.thumb.jpg.037243469e174c91d0db5c45ec64095d.jpg

Once I've performed my tripirtite collimation routine with the cheshire, laser and tublug, I unspap the parallizer from the drawtube, and snap in my camera, which also has a male T-ring (and the zwo t2 -> 1.25" filter adapter inside it):

IMG_20200407_000248.thumb.jpg.0960f7dfef9c481884673eebc0a00e16.jpg

Like so:

IMG_20200407_000309.thumb.jpg.018c0adcc6961113eeb1f8cac46514d1.jpg

After this, I crack open a can of guinness and proceed with my imaging session wearing a big fat collimated smile on my face 😀

Hope this helps,

Minos

Edited by mAnKiNd
spelling
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and yes!!! i had a try with my mount this morning at 4AM ( utc +2) 

i did choose the M13 with the moon who was still up. DSS took 42mins of my 51Mins exposures i gave it. 

so 42*60s light, 21 darks, 20flats,38 bias. stacked in DSS en processed inCpatureone Pro since i must re-install PI.

mount Skywatcher EQM35PRO with ofcourse my lovely 130PDS ☺️

 

Autosave.jpg

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 02/04/2020 at 16:41, mAnKiNd said:

For anyone interested in fixing their star shapes (subject is Vega) from this to this:

1493653969_aperturemaskfix.thumb.jpeg.41f4a46a8416934e74ab60444098c1eb.jpeg

I designed a 3D print on tinkercad (.sti file attached)Skywatcher 130PDS Newtonian Primary Mirror Aperture Mask.stl, found a local 3D print shop to make it for me and applied to the mirror clips as such:

 

Looks great. I'd like to do this but I know nothing about 3D printing. If I just give that file to someone who has a 3D printer can they produce it for me and will it be scaled correctly ?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Spaced Out said:

Looks great. I'd like to do this but I know nothing about 3D printing. If I just give that file to someone who has a 3D printer can they produce it for me and will it be scaled correctly ?

Thanks

Yep, that's the idea! Depending on the quality of their 3D printer, it will make it to either exacting or loose tolerances. The height and outer rim are not important in terms of tolerance, but the inner rim should be as smooth as possible.

Hope this helps ☺️

Minos

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

  • Similar Content

    • By Astro_Dad
      Looking forward to receiving my 102MC in the next few days/weeks depending on supply. Does anyone have any experience, tips/advice?  Looks like a good grab and go particularity for planetary observation - interesting “next generation” mount. 
    • By JoeS81
      Hi everyone,
      I'm completely new to telescopes and know nothing but I want to learn and I need some advice!
      I have a budget of £200 which I can't stretch. I really like both the Skywatcher Heritage 150p and SW Skyliner 150p which I believe has been along longer than the Heritage.
      I would like to take the scope out occasionally to dark skies (so the heritage would be easier to transport) but with 2 very young children at home the reality is that I will mostly be using the scope in the back garden.
      Obviously both scopes are 150p but come with different accessory spec (specs below).... please could someone advise which would give me the most bang for my buck?!
       
      Heritage 150p:
      Magnifications (with eyepieces supplied): x30 & x75
      Highest Practical Power (Potential): x300
      Diameter of Primary Mirror: 150mm
      Telescope Focal Length: 750mm (f/5)
      Eyepieces Supplied (1.25"): 10mm & 25mm
      Parabolic Primary Mirror
      3-arm Secondary Mirror Spider Support
      Red Dot Finder
      Wooden Alt-Azimuth Mount
      Collapsible/ Extendable Tube Assembly
      Weight Approx 7.5kg
      Supplied with Gift Box
      33% more Light Gathering than 130mm
      Skyliner 150p:
      Magnifications (with eyepieces supplied): x48 & x120 Highest Practical Power (Potential): x306 Diameter of Primary Mirror: 153mm Telescope Focal Length: 1200mm (f/8) Eyepieces Supplied (1.25"): 10mm & 25mm Parabolic Primary Mirror 0.5mm Ultra-Thin Secondary Mirror Supports 6x30 Finderscope Direct SLR Camera Connection Wooden Alt-Azimuth Mount with Accessory Tray 73% more Light Gathering than 114mm Many thanks!
       
    • By AstroRuz
      For sale is my beloved but now superfluous to requirements HEQ5 Pro for £650
      It's in a used condition as you would imagine. I've had it for about 4 years and found great success with this mount. Ideal for those beginning astrophotography and also good for visual users.
      I'm calling it "deluxe" due to the upgrades I've had done.
      - It's belt modified
      - It's had brand new bearings and grease
      - The backlash has been expertly setup 
      - It has the latest polar scope
      - The power port has been replaced with an aviation style port which is a lot more secure
      It'll come with the hand controller and at least 1 counterweight (if I can find the second it'll come with both). The polar scope cover has been lost. The counterweight is rusty as always. There is some marring on the counterweight bar housing as shown in the photos.
      It also will come with the modified power cable required also.
      Note: the power LED sometimes doesn't illuminate but the mount is still powered (please see the photo with the hand controller).
      Collection or local delivery within Northampton







    • By Spacecake2
      Hello,
      I know you've seen these questions a lot (unless your new) but I'm struggling a lot on if I should buy a Skywatcher 250px (10") or 200px (8") (dobsonians). I have a 5 inch and i'm looking for a big step up for noticeable changes. 
      Thank you 
       
    • By Hoopla
      Hi All,
      im totally new to this and have been getting setup over the past 3 months. I’ve purchased a Skywatcher 150P on a EQ3 Pro mount. 
       
      I have a 2x and 3x Barlow with 10x and 20x eyepieces. I’m trying to view and photograph Mars as it’s so bright at present and easy to see however I’m really struggling to see anything more than a bright ball when viewing and when photographing it’s just a blurry ball. 
       
      I have a canon 700d DSLR with t ring and adaptors  
      can folk suggest what combination of Barlow / eyepiece would be required to view Mars in all its glory and possibly lens and iso/exposure settings to get some nice shots too please. I’m aware I may need to stack and am tech savvy so this bit should be ok. I just can’t seem to get anything at present to process.
      help!! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.