Jump to content

stargazine_ep34_banner.thumb.jpg.28dd32d9305c7de9b6591e6bf6600b27.jpg

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Just a few of the goodies ive had from the 130pds over the past few months:            

All images have been made with a Canon450D (unmodded), on a HEQ5 PRO goto, 9x50 finder guider (QHY5). Me and my garden gnome: several M51 crops: M97 & 108: M81 & M82 (& NGC3077): M81

Not great pics from me, but this is what i got so far since beginning with AP in august this year. No guiding and maximum time of expousures 30 sek.

Posted Images

33 minutes ago, mAnKiNd said:

Hi all,

Here's a few images I took this month from my super dark sky backyard:

https://www.astrobin.com/9j3re6/?nc=user

https://www.astrobin.com/72lpuk/?nc=user

https://www.astrobin.com/1mbaoz/?nc=user

Cheers,

Minos

Lh3fJc1pm0MV_16536x16536_kWXURFLk.png.18abefca49ac00b39dc53d4b9063b281.png

hCe6z0UnElKm_16536x16536_kWXURFLk.thumb.png.0771dde8f1064b35f2dfa92174ac939f.pngspacer.pngzv1aMK-Ab0BX_16536x16536_kWXURFLk.thumb.png.b820c63cfd52f959aa2391e4ee20e3bc.pngIMG_20200122_193943.thumb.jpg.ccdcbd3c5fbeb6a206d32cead76ab442.jpg

What mount is that? It looks like an EQ5, but with little black boxes for the motors.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Galen Gilmore said:

Thanks, been out of the loop for a while. Is that a new-ish mount?

New-ish, been around 2-3 years at a guess. If you zoom in to the photo, you can see the letters EQM-35 PRO on the control box.

I have one, I really like it. It's essentially an EQ3-2 (scope payload capacity 4-5kg ish) with the 10kg scope payload capacity of an EQ5. The "M" stands for modular, as you can take it apart to act as a tracker-only for mounting a ball head and DSLR for example.

Cheers, Magnus

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Captain Magenta said:

New-ish, been around 2-3 years at a guess. If you zoom in to the photo, you can see the letters EQM-35 PRO on the control box.

I have one, I really like it. It's essentially an EQ3-2 (scope payload capacity 4-5kg ish) with the 10kg scope payload capacity of an EQ5. The "M" stands for modular, as you can take it apart to act as a tracker-only for mounting a ball head and DSLR for example.

Cheers, Magnus

Its worth noting that its also got a bigger RA gear that the EQ3 or EQ5 and so guides more accurately. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Adam J said:

Its worth noting that its also got a bigger RA gear that the EQ3 or EQ5 and so guides more accurately. 

Having owned both the EQ5 and now the EQM-35, that bigger RA gear does makes a positive difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This image was both a failure and a success at the same time. It was my first time shooting the rosette, and I wanted to make it a good one.

I was able to get 20x2mins on Saturday, and 40x2mins on Sunday. Although all of the images on Sunday became completely unusable, I accidentally had the DSLR slightly rotated within the focuser, and I guess more people had their lights on because LP was significantly worse.

So I was only able to use a small portion of the frames I collected, about 40 minutes. 

Although I felt like I really resurrected the image from the grave in post processing. I learned a new technique for gradient removal (the image had the worst gradient possible). And while it’s definitely not great, it looks a lot better than I expected it too be considering the state of the picture.

38CCCC91-8B38-4BE1-8C03-ED11ECF14311.thumb.jpeg.b8adb2f4e114f27a6b1f9dc93314e528.jpeg

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got my 130PDS and first clear skies so captured the Orion nebula as first target of choice.  Very pleased with the decision to purchase this scope.  Processing could use a little work, looks like some blueing at the edges (maybe bad flats?)

 

WDPhotos_1580413609518.jpg

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my first full colour picture from a mono camera 🙂

This nebula sits next to Navi in Cassiopeia (Gamma Cass)- apparently the star is gradually eroding the nebula. The nebula itself is both an emission and a reflection nebula, but I think I’ve only managed to capture the emission parts here.

I took this over 2 nights on 15th and 17th Jan. It’s been a bit of a learning process to put this together:

40 mins of 2 minute subs in each of LRGB on 15th

100 mins of 5 minute subs in Ha on 17th

It certainly takes a bit more effort to process mono, and it wasn’t helped by loads of problems with ice and fogging on my secondary. This led to not getting much Ha signal, and I’ve used layers in Gimp to bring it out (don’t tell Pixinsight- they’ll excommunicate me!). I think there’s probably more can be extracted from this data- especially around the body of the nebula- but I’m still pleased to have a full colour image!

I had another go at this a few days later and the whole scope completely iced up- see picture at the bottom!1518295051_GhostHaRGB200115.thumb.jpg.243f3011ffca1e2120d33f8353bab01d.jpgIMG_20200119_095755719.thumb.jpg.f357e98cdd518ef001c833655abbfa32.jpg

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Adam J said:

Awesome Image, is the 290 your only camera or just using it for small targets? 

Thanks Adam :)

I currently have the ASI290MM-Cool and ASI290MC-Cool. One for narrowband and luminance and the other for RGB. I have owned a number of cameras over the years, but I sold them off to finance other projects. 290 is a great little sensor, albeit small.

Cheers

Edited by mAnKiNd
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Nova2000 said:

guiding setup

gs.thumb.jpg.90af40a003f7802e739dee13b9d14d76.jpg

 

Hi

2 alternatives shown here. An off axis guider with t7m or 60mm guide telescope, discontinued zwo120mm and 40mm dovetail clamp. Black shower cap optional.

HTH

Edited by alacant
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone.

Not had the little 130 out for some time, so to redress the balance here's a -bit disappointing- cone nebula. Disappointing through impatience more than anything; need more frames, but there's so much going on below e.g. canis major stuff I never get around to...

There's something there but not enough.

Thanks for looking and all comments most welcome

Cheers and clear skies.

1369366464_2-2264(copy).thumb.jpg.41c6665634a29c6ce403dab2f02d77f2.jpg

Edited by alacant
  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, alacant said:

gs.thumb.jpg.90af40a003f7802e739dee13b9d14d76.jpg

 

Hi

2 alternatives shown here. An off axis guider with t7m or 60mm guide telescope, discontinued zwo120mm and 40mm dovetail clamp. Black shower cap optional.

HTH

love the showercap! I'm getting one thanks! :)

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Nova2000 said:

Just curious, what guiding setup would be ideal to start with the 130pds on heq5 to good more length on the subs ?

I went from a QHY miniguidescope on the findershoe to an evoguide 50 screwed onto the top dovetail of the mounting rings and saw a huge difference in guiding i.e. went from a total RMS (px) error >1.5" to ~ -0.5-0.7".

Hope this helps.

Minos

 

P.S. excuse the cable wrapping mess...also, you can see that I'm now using the qhy finder rings to run camera cables through..!

IMG_20200120_094110.thumb.jpg.bf2ddee00a977b13029e62f64cf36a87.jpg

IMG-20190812-WA0012.jpg.6ed9c827cfa8a426cd093fb71ba8e34e.jpg

 

Edited by mAnKiNd
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Planetarian
      Hi, I've got a Skywatcher Heritage 130p reflector, and if i insert anything less than 10mm eyepiece, the image won't get crisp. I guess it's normal, but as I'm very new to astronomy, I'd like to know what the sharpness depends on exactly. 
      Is that the focal length (how fast the telescope is? ) or the size of the mirror and how much light it gathers? Or both affect it the same way?  
      Are things the same with refractors in this regard? Thanks. 
    • By ThadeusB
      I have for sale my Skywatcher Startravel 120. Objective lens 120mm; Focal length . It is in excellent condition, clean and only very minor marks. Clean optics, no fungus. The focusser is the original one and works smoothly; 1.25" and 2" adaptors. With both caps.
      A very good starter scope, or good as a portable scope.
      Included accessories: red dot finder; 90 degree star diagonal; 10mm & 25mm EPs; mobile phone adaptor. All in as new condition.
      Please don't ask me to split this package.
      Price £140.00 no offers.
      It will be very well packed.
      Payment: paypal or bank transfer
      I can deliver by Hermes; I can get a quotation for this if you wish. Or you can make your own courier arrangement, or collect in person.
      Please PM me if you would like more information.









    • By Quentent
      Hi,
       
      So just today i got my new EQ3 mount and tripod delivered.
      Brought it out, balanced it leveled it etc etc.
      So i polar aligned it,  and selected 2 Star Alignment.
      1st star to align to: Betelgeuse.
      As soon as i hit confirm align the motors kick in but as soon as the mount starts to rotate the motors stop and the hand controller resets itself immediatly and starts initializing all over again.
      I discovered that moving Ra on its own works just fine as does moving Dec on its own but whenever i press for example the left and Up arrows at the same time the mount stops and the hand controller resets.
      Could this just be a problem with power draw? The Synpro box takes 12V DC and is supplied by a 12V DC car outlet type power source. However i changed this to a 3 Pin UK 12V 1A DC & AC plug.
       
      Im hoping the power supply is the issue and not something else.
    • By Soulitude
      Hi everyone I am new here, I live in Perth Western Australia (bottle class 5) and have just brought my new set up. There hasn’t been anyone in the area I can talk to about astrophotography so tried to do it all myself online and I fear I may have incorrectly purchased some things. (I tried to get things one at a time for budget purposes)
      I have this set up
      heq5, evostar ed80, .85reducer & corrector, evoguide 50ed, zwo 120mm mini for guiding and just my canon 200d mkii for the imaging. 
      The telescope, I think I may have brought something that’s not great for imaging and that’s all I’ve wanted to do. 
      can you please provide a better telescope alternative that would be suitable for all my other gear without having to buy like a new mount etc. I’m thinking just a slightly better scope not too heavy, opinions would be much appreciated 💖💖💖 xx
    • By Tonny
      Hello guys  I am an absolute amateur buying his first telescope... and I am desperate, please help.
      My budget is around 1300 euro (1600$). I am interested mostly in DSO... astrophotography, but observing as well. 

      So refractors are better for astrophotography, crisp clear views, plus they are low maintenance... but refractors with big aperture are too expensive, apo refractors even more... and I think that I want big aperture, because I am interested in observing as well, not only astrophotography. Sooo more light, more details, more magnification. Please correct me, if I am mistaken.
      Also, I know the mount is really important for photography, but these scopes comes with mounts that maybe are not the best, but are they good enough? 

      I am considering these three options now:
      1. https://www.astroshop.eu/telescopes/skywatcher-telescope-n-200-1000-explorer-bd-neq-5-pro-synscan-goto/p,20291#tab_bar_1_select 
      2. https://www.astroshop.eu/telescopes/bresser-telescope-ac-152-760-ar-152s-messier-hexafoc-exos-2-goto/p,14209#tab_bar_2_select 
      3. https://www.astroshop.eu/telescopes/bresser-telescope-ac-127l-1200-messier-hexafoc-exos-2-goto/p,14206

      Bresser 127 have smaller aperture, but very good reviews... on the other hand Skywatcher have nice reviews as well and bigger aperture.
      Bresser 152 sounds really nice, but is a bit expensive, and as long as I have to buy an eyepiece, nebula filter, adapter for my DSLR, maybe this CA correcting filter... it will goes above my budget and I don't know if it deserve it, and again - Skywatcher wouldn't be better?
      The only thing that censers me about the Skywatcher is that collimation thing every time and that it could be too complicated for a newbie (that is what I read about big reflectors)... usually this kind of things wouldn't scare me, I mean how complicated it can be... If it is the better telescope than it deserve a little more maintenance?

      Since I am not going to be a professional, I want to observe and take photos just for fun - I know I have to compromise with something for this price... I am just very confused after all I read.... And as I said, I am a newbie never took a look trough a telescope, so I trust Internet and I am ready to buy the first telescope someone advise me  
      I don't thing I could afford buying telescope again any time soon, that is why I want something good, that I wouldn't need to change and be happy with it for maaany years.
      Please correct me, if I am wrong with all these and if there is a better telescope for me?

      Thanks in advance!  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.