Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_the_milky_way.thumb.jpg.dbd8b15e81d11e9303c8d6ef1898ac08.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

Stop posting amazing pictures!!! You are making me jealous! :D

I just need some clear skies...

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We were lucky last Saturday as there was a small window without clouds from 7pm to 1am, but here in south Europe we´ve  also suffered (fortunately for the dryness) two months of continuous clouds, rains and snow.

Edited: Added a second version of the pair M81 M82, if you zoom in there can be seen another two galaxies in the frame, one on the below right corner and another one upper center, I guess they are PGC galaxies, anyhow with only 150sec exposure it is amazing to see that this little scope is capable of capture Mag 15 galaxies undere Bortle 5-6 skies.

M81_82_16022018S.png

Edited by Susaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So this is a completely unprocessed image from last night. Having some difficulty stacking and processing at the moment so thought I'd post this as a teaser for now. Not bad for the first image from my new equipment!

130PDS, HEQ5 Pro, Nikon D5000, 30 second Sub ISO 400

I ended up taking 35 subs, 10 darks and 10 bias frames but as I mentioned I'm struggling with the stacking process at the moment so will take a while to get the final image.

M32 in Orion :)

Clear skies!

 

DSC_0090.jpg

Edited by simondodd
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, simondodd said:

So this is a completely unprocessed image from last night. Having some difficulty stacking and processing at the moment so thought I'd post this as a teaser for now. Not bad for the first image from my new equipment!

130PDS, HEQ5 Pro, Nikon D5000, 30 second Sub ISO 400

I ended up taking 35 subs, 10 darks and 10 bias frames but as I mentioned I'm struggling with the stacking process at the moment so will take a while to get the final image.

M32 in Orion :)

Clear skies!

 

DSC_0090.jpg

Looking good :) 

Not sure if its just my eyes but focus looks slightly off? do you use a bahtinov mask or live view focus?

I would also consider upping the ISO rating to get a little more colour and detail, as can all be dealt with post processing :)

Thanks,

T

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah the focussing is definitely slightly off, it was live view focussed. Not too far off but definitely off! Thanks for the tip, I'll up it to 600 or 800 for the next session.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, simondodd said:

Yeah the focussing is definitely slightly off, it was live view focussed. Not too far off but definitely off! Thanks for the tip, I'll up it to 600 or 800 for the next session.

 

i usually work around 800 - 1600 depending on what i'm targeting. 

 

i just had my canon modified and took it out last night for a quick session at M42, ill post a single sub on here soon. i'm still a newbie at this aswell :)

 

T

Edit:

 

Uploaded single sub iso 800 2 min exposure

IMG_9477.jpg

 

blur at bottom was a tree that got in the way >.<

 

Edited by tony8690
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, simondodd said:

it was live view focussed

Live view is teh best way, make sure you zoom in and if possible get a bahtinov mask (a 'CND symbol' cut out of card works fine).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With ISO400 you will get better FullWell for an object like M42 it is great. The sub you have preserves the core without burnt, so what you need is to increase the time exposure up to 3 min to reveal the nebulosity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this is the final version for now... 24 subs of 30 seconds each at ISO 400, 10 Darks & 10 Bias. 

Edited.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Captured this M37 with my 130PDS + EQ5 +350d last night.

It was one of those bothersome nights when I was attacked by Gremlins. Managed 10 x 2 minutes subs before the 130 finally crashed into the mount and I was too cold to carry on!

Still, pleased with this for such a short integration time.

Thanks

Vern

 

5a9023f993222_Autosave_M37-Copy.thumb.jpg.da36a0e19372eafa1b0d66b2cc00e006.jpg

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, simondodd said:

Well this is the final version for now... 24 subs of 30 seconds each at ISO 400, 10 Darks & 10 Bias. 

Edited.jpg

Nice, but it looks like you clipped the data. Try to keep the full histogram visible, only clipping the "flat" parts. Try adjusting color balance in the shadows to get a nice looking background instead of clipping shadow detail.

Other than that good picture, a lot of good detail visible there.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, vernmid said:

Hi all,

Captured this M37 with my 130PDS + EQ5 +350d last night.

It was one of those bothersome nights when I was attacked by Gremlins. Managed 10 x 2 minutes subs before the 130 finally crashed into the mount and I was too cold to carry on!

Still, pleased with this for such a short integration time.

Thanks

Vern

 

5a9023f993222_Autosave_M37-Copy.thumb.jpg.da36a0e19372eafa1b0d66b2cc00e006.jpg

Nice star field.

Neat stars as well.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Might as well post this here as well, although it was already posted in other forums.

5a9032ac8529b_Pleadiesstack3-mod4.thumb.jpg.be6ae383e34d771d126efd3bcfff8ad6copy.jpg.605978e69c946ae73bbba8df240b7429.jpg

So far this is one of my best photos, over an hour of integration time too, which is a first.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, simondodd said:

Well this is the final version for now... 24 subs of 30 seconds each at ISO 400, 10 Darks & 10 Bias. 

Edited.jpg

There's a lot of nice detail in here. Definitely worth doing some flats too. It should remove that glow to below and left of the Nebula. Good pic :-)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it's not ideal but I took some flats this evening and added them to the stack and then did a complete reprocess in photoshop... Fair amount of difference although the final histogram isn't great so I'm sure I've made some mistakes and cropped out some data somewhere along the way. I'm happier with the final image though :)

24subs @30seconds, ISO 400, 10 Darks, 10 Bias, 19 flats. Nikon D5000, 130PDS, HEQ5 Pro. :)

V2.4.jpg

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, simondodd said:

I know it's not ideal but I took some flats this evening and added them to the stack and then did a complete reprocess in photoshop... Fair amount of difference although the final histogram isn't great so I'm sure I've made some mistakes and cropped out some data somewhere along the way. I'm happier with the final image though :)

24subs @30seconds, ISO 400, 10 Darks, 10 Bias, 19 flats. Nikon D5000, 130PDS, HEQ5 Pro. :)

V2.4.jpg

Wow, big improvement! Congrats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear al 130PDS fans,

Yesterday we went out to the -6ºC with the Moon just to test guiding, but in between I tried some subs with the QHY168C using a visual UHC filter from Optolong. I am (happily) surprised about its performance in terms of color balance as the stars didn´t look purple, the color balance for this filter seems quite similar to the IDAS LPS D1 I also use often. The big difference here is the price less than 50 eur the Optolong agains the almos 200 eur for the IDAS.

The picture of the pair M46, M47 it not completely processed, only the integration of 29 x 1min subs with bias, 10 darks, and flats at Gain 1, Offset 0.

Cheers.

Mario.

 

M46_47.png

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Work in progress. Lots of issue with flats and focus was out. Tried to remove double refraction's but this has caused an issue in M43. Also tried star reduction but this caused the middle of loads of stars being removed but not the outer, so looks like loads on donuts. But though I would still post it. 

LHaRHaGB.jpeg

Edited by spillage
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear 130PDS fans,

Here another picture from last Saturday with quarter Moon, the Horsehead Nebula and NGC2023, NGC2024, IC3435. The picture has a lot of readout noise due to the integration frame is an HDR of 15 subs of 30secs and 15 subs of 150secs at Gain 1 Offset 0 with the QHY168C, at low Gain and with shorter exposures de reaout noise is increased. I also used an UHC filter from Optolong (a 2'' 40eur filter). It was also made on the Madrid outskirts with all the light pollution dome above our heads.

Cheers.

Mario.

B33.png

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the M46 M47 pair with a little bit more of processing.

 

M46_M47.png

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone. It was nice getting back to the sw130 having been working with a sw250p for the up and coming galaxies. It also shows how stable it is; wind -even gentle gusts- are enough to ruin frames in the 250 whereas the 130 is barely affected. Clusters in the wind:

m44

ngc2281

m46-m47

Thanks for looking and clear skies.

44.thumb.jpg.b256fb021660abf34d51f7ed9ae488ce.jpg

2281.thumb.jpg.206c684f91fd93c5ae79eebe539e90a2.jpg

46-47.thumb.jpg.dee3d18f8d3deff635307d9523b59dfe.jpg

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least you don´t have clouds in Eastern Spain. Here in the center it is impossible to have a decent night.

  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/03/2018 at 15:08, alacant said:

Hi everyone. It was nice getting back to the sw130 having been working with a sw250p for the up and coming galaxies. It also shows how stable it is; wind -even gentle gusts- are enough to ruin frames in the 250 whereas the 130 is barely affected. Clusters in the wind:

m44

ngc2281

m46-m47

Thanks for looking and clear skies.

44.thumb.jpg.b256fb021660abf34d51f7ed9ae488ce.jpg

2281.thumb.jpg.206c684f91fd93c5ae79eebe539e90a2.jpg

46-47.thumb.jpg.dee3d18f8d3deff635307d9523b59dfe.jpg

Blues looking good! 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I still have lots of time this season to acquire more data, but I processed what I have anyway. Lum - 120x30s and unity gain from last year, 77x180s and half unity (76g/15offset) this month. RGB - 7x180s each, this month.

I don't seem to get along with this scope nowadays, there's horrible uneven gradient when I shoot with the IDAS-P2 filter, but none with the GB and just a bit with the R?!?! I didn't have any issue when I used the same filter with the Esprit 80 so I have really no clue.

However, my best processing from last evening:

M13-F588-2018-03-22-LRGB_p04_half.jpg

And annotated: http://nova.astrometry.net/user_images/2033482#annotated

Edited by moise212
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   2 members

  • Similar Content

    • By Sunshine
      HEY its about time eh!!!! my first astrophoto with a dedicated cam using all the bells and whistles like iCap and Registax.
       Programs that are still alien mumbo jumbo to me, but after eating a whole bunch of youtube videos and a bunch more trial and error, I finally pumped out this abomination, or so it must seem to you Pro's lol
      I had a very vague idea of how to set up proper parameters in iCap for lunar imaging but I tried several settings and used youtube also, regarding wavelets, I basically dragged sliders all over the place
      and watched changes occur. There is much to learn about post work in iCap, but i'll give it the old college try lol, my sole reason for posting is for feedback, this is where you Pro's shine, oh do I need 
      feedback. 
      Anyway, it is my first astrophoto so no matter how much better it can be, well, it will do for now and I say that with a bit of swag because hey! at least I see craters there lol.
      Exposure time.....no clue!
      Number of frames....a whole bunch
      Attempts.....way too many!
      Wavelet values.....all over the place
      De noising....didn't work at all I think
      Codec...Y800
      Resolution...12 something by ??? forgot
      The conditions were horrid, a mak is not an imaging scope as I have learned the hard way, F1800 not good, I will definitely be looking at a much shorter FL scope,
      Far too tight an image, I would need a 50 shot mosaic for full moon, or a focal reducer which I'm not sure anyone makes for my Mak.

    • By Sunshine
      Finally i have had some time tonight, under a clear sky, to point my new SW Mak 150 which i bought in December at the beautiful waxing crescent moon in the western sky outside my backyard porch.
      i had no idea what to expect, having never even looked through a mak before, i set the scope out early and left it to equalize while i had dinner and some television, 3 hours later i realized i had put the scope out and bolted out lol.
      I inserted my 24mm X cell LX reasoning that with the inherent narrow FOV of this scope i better use a 24 right off the bat, well it was just enough to squeeze the moon into the FOV entirely, and what a grand view it was, i really was blown away!.
      First off i was struck by the beautiful contrast, the razor sharp limb against the inky black sky was fantastic, second was earthshine, beautiful looking and striking against the darker backdrop, craters speckled up and down the terminator with mare's and mountain ranges 
      beautifully contrasted and razor sharp.
      Seeing conditions were very good, with minimal atmospheric distortion,  i was able to push magnification up to 250 while maintaining image quality with minimal loss, i can honestly say that this Mak has provided me with a view of the moon i haven't seen since 
      looking through a Televue Frac at a star party years ago.
      I can't wait to give Jupiter a go later tonight if the clouds don't roll in as expected since rain is in the forecast for the morning, but i don't mind anyway, i have waited since December for both weather and time to finally use my new scope, i can wait for jupiter.
      Tonight, i felt as though i rediscovered the moon, such was the absolutely beautiful view through this scope which is new to me, i will be looking at some eyepieces with a bit longer FL to give me a bit more FOV around the moon, maybe a 30mm would do the trick.
       
       
    • By Morddraig
      I bought a used EQ5 before Xmas from a well known auction site.  IT came boxed, and seemed in good condition.  Due to the pitiful weather here in Caerphilly, South Wales, UK, and also to my old arthritic joints being what they are, I finally and for the first time got it all out this afternoon to look at the sun.  All was going well, I managed to find it (!) and got it tracking.  After about 40 mins or so, I noticed it seemed to have stopped tracking and decided to try to figure out what the issue might be (with my very limited knowledge, this means check the power)  The mount was still running, and allowed me to use the direction keys on the handset to move the mount in both RA and Dec axis...up to a point.  It seemed to have no problem moving the RA, but the Dec ( I think its that one) axis would move completely in one direction, but then stopped moving when it got to a particular point in the other direction.  No movement at all once it had stopped though the motors could be heard running.  There also seemed to be a few "clicks" heard.  Im completely stumped by this and not a little disappointed about it as it would seem I have bought a defective mount.  Being a total newbie doesnt help, but my guess is that the gears are stuffed.  Can anyone please suggest what to do next, though Im new to all this, I have no issue with trying to fix it if anyone can point me in the right direction please.
    • By NoOneItsPerfect
      Hello, 
      My name is Daniel.. i recently bought a sky watcher 150p  , since then i struggle with the alignment  for different reasons (UK weather most of the time) now having this great days i tried again let`s say everything was alright  not perfect.
      I am more interested to do astro photography then just looking trough the eyepiece..so i tried  i attached my camera Canon 50D to the telescope..but it looks like i can`t get the right focus.. so i just went online bought a Eye piece projection i tried again and still i got problems with the focus. (can someone let me know what i do wrong or how i should do it)so i can take some pictures with Jupiter.. or how i can get any pictures.. as i really wanna take pictures with Planets,Galaxy etc..
      I am new to this so be gentle  i appreciate any comments.
      Thank you, Daniel 
    • By Davenn
      hi guys
      All my lunar imaging has usually been done with DSLR camera and telephoto lenses, usually the Canon 100-400mm and a x2 teleconverter
      Last nite I finally fired up the new scope and did some imaging
      Skywatcher 120mm x 1000mm fl EVOSTAR Black Diamond
      The mount is a HEQ5 PRO
      so for the first lunar image through that scope with a ASI1600MM camera and Sharpcap capture software

       

       
      Dave
       
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.