Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_2.thumb.jpg.72789c04780d7659f5b63ea05534a956.jpg

First light on Saturn ... Drum Roll


Recommended Posts

Hello

Please find my first attempt at Saturn. Advice needed on how I can improve capture and processing.

My adventure started at 6:00 am this morning taking on -2C ice and frost, to capture Saturn in the South before sunrise.

The transparency was good though and the stars looked really crisp against the still dark sky. (Exciting!)

I managed to capture two run of 39000 images at 65FPS at 15ms exposures, raw mono data.

Using my 127mm Mak (1500) with a 2x Barlow to get it up to 3000mm

Anyhow just finished processing, process followed was. (Was done in a bit of a rush.)

Dark Frame

10000 stack at -2C

Reference Frame

AS!2 - 25% using 4 quality setting, sharpening and mix in raw 50%, 

REGISTAX -  Wavelets and gamma adjusted, Histogram stretched.

Main Frame

AS!2 - 50% using 4 quality setting, sharpening and mix in raw 50%

REGISTAX -  Wavelets and gamma adjusted, Histogram stretched and increase size to 1.5

gallery_32740_2937_3132.jpg

I have been a bit aggressive with my wavelets and placed this on a black background, with a bit of mid-tone adjustment.

It feels a bit blurry and very yellow, not much in the blue channel, is this normal?

Do I need I need to up my FL to from 3000 to 4500? 

Lack detail for +-20000 images, should I up the exposure and reduce the images?

I am being overly critical for my equipment?

Thanks for the feedback, appreciate it guys.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hello Please find my first attempt at Saturn. Advice needed on how I can improve capture and processing. My adventure started at 6:00 am this morning taking on -2C ice and frost, to capture Saturn in

You did well with small scope and so low. Notice the ring angle this year guys Its opened a lot

Hi To adress the color: before registax, try out PIPP and check the option 'stretch histogram' in some of the processing tab. In my case using a dslr, my starting color are about the same as yours. Af

Posted Images

Thats a remarkable image Chris. For a 5" scope with Saturn so low and months off opposition.  I would stick with that fl maybe even reduce it slighlty. If you use auto rgb align and rgb balance in registax that will correct the colour issues.

Interesting you using dark frames which is not something one would normally do with planetary imaging.

This proves again how good the cmos cams are on Saturn.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a remarkable image Chris. For a 5" scope with Saturn so low and months off opposition.  I would stick with that fl maybe even reduce it slighlty. If you use auto rgb align and rgb balance in registax that will correct the colour issues.

Interesting you using dark frames which is not something one would normally do with planetary imaging.

This proves again how good the cmos cams are on Saturn.

Thanks for the words of encouragement.

Having been playing with the raw data and there is very little data in the blue channel.

Done some research and it could be due to Saturn lying low against the horizon, thus the atmosphere is acting likea orange filter and blocking the blue light. This happens when you get a blood moon.

I am going to try to create L channel to overlay and see if I can tease out more detail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the same stack of images, but with extract of the luminance with registax and the a blue filter applied in photo shop.

I had to up the exposure as the blue filter and luminance actually darked the image.

Not sure I am going to be able to do much better than this without more data / bigger scope. :) (getting ideas)

gallery_32740_2937_13136.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice to see Saturn returning this year, and this is a really early start at very low elevation.    Very nice capture indeed Chris and plenty of room for improvement as it nears opposition in May - let's hope for some good conditions.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You did well with small scope and so low. Notice the ring angle this year guys Its opened a lot

Thanks Neil, it was really low, although because it is a bright object and day it only getting light so late I managed to gather data till just before 7am.

As we approach spring, I think it is going to become harder as it will be getting lighter with Saturn still lower.

I am tempted to get a bigger scope, but I have just got a 80ED for x-mas so will be doing some DSO work in the spring.

I think that's a damn fine effort given Saturn's distance and low elevation.

James

Thanks James, means a lot coming from you, I know you like to squeeze your equipment to get the most out of it.

Nice to see Saturn returning this year, and this is a really early start at very low elevation.    Very nice capture indeed Chris and plenty of room for improvement as it nears opposition in May - let's hope for some good conditions.

Thanks Jake, it is really low in elevation and has dramatically reduced my blue channel, although this is my first attempt at Saturn, so don't no what to expect.

I will post my stacked imaged data onto drop box for people to play with, may be I am trying to process it same as Jupiter and therefore missing a trick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please feel free to download any of the streams and to play with them. Please provide feedback if you find that I missed something in the data.

(I can upload the raw data on request which is 3GB.)

39420 Raw images taken at 65FPS and 16ms exposure @ -2C with a 10000 Raw stacked dark frame

AS!2 Stacked Data:

Pre Normalise and Sharpen - Pure stack (0.4 mb)

25% with 4 Noise robust selection, pre-normalise & sharpen

50% with 4 Noise robust selection, pre-normalise & sharpen

50% with 4 Noise robust selection, post-normalise & sharpen

75% with 6 Noise robust selection, Post-normalise & sharpen

3x Drizzle Stack 75% with 6 Noise robust selection, Post-normalise / sharpen (4Mb)

If you get the drizzle data to work, please let me know what you did as it stumps me every time... muchas gracias

Have fun :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never process an image without using auto rgb align and rgb balance. To completely erase the false colour fringing I also used colour noise reduction in image analyser.

3x drizzle will never work but 1.5x drizzle will in good seeing.

Edited by Space Cowboy
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just did a 3x drizzle image ... have to use very high wavelets did the auto balance and get a very blue image.

gallery_32740_2937_10608.jpg

Used Gamma setting to reduce the blue, but still have some blue fringes ... I will investigate colour noise reduction in image analyser.

Thanks for the tips so far all helps in the quest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You did well with small scope and so low. Notice the ring angle this year guys Its opened a lot

Hopefully get some more fine detail on the rings and even better North polar projection for the hexagon..(assuming the weather allows of course)

typed on my mobile with Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just did a 3x drizzle image ... have to use very high wavelets did the auto balance and get a very blue image.

gallery_32740_2937_10608.jpg

Used Gamma setting to reduce the blue, but still have some blue fringes ... I will investigate colour noise reduction in image analyser.

Thanks for the tips so far all helps in the quest.

Colour noise reduction wont work unless you use auto rgb align first Chris. The problem with using such heavy wavelets on the 3x drizzle is you are narrowing the rings considerably and losing the round globe of the planet. The signal to noise ratio is too weak at 3x in my opinion resulting in the use of excessive sharpening and noise reduction.

Edited by Space Cowboy
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice.

That makes sense, this is why I am struggling with drizzle on my Jupiter images where much better signal is needed to pull out the details on the planet. Other than better seeing and transparency. What else can I do to increase signal reduce noise.

Bigger scope?

More images?

Cooler camera?

Mono camera?

What is the best bang for buck?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You did well to capture Saturn so early. The seeing is going to be the key to getting a good image this year.

Had a bit of a play with your image whilst waiting for my dinner to cook, only a few mins work in R6 etc but I think it helps to show the importance of using the RGB align as Stuart has commented on a couple of times. It really is a must with all colour cam images and is even more important when the target is so low.

post-7987-0-49893500-1389207622_thumb.pn

Hope you get some decent weather to get out again soon.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

wow! fantastic image very well captured! i am amazed how bright it is mine tend to be pretty dull!

Thanks, I think the brightness comes from the amount of frames ... at 40,000 over about 12 minutes.

My research suggests that you don't really have a time limit to exposure due to rotation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MarsG76
      Hello All,
      This is a photo accurate representation of how I've seen the conjunction through a Skywatch 14" f4.6 Dobsonian, using the 17mm Ethos eyepiece combined with the 2X Powermate during the observation of the great conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn, and how well both of the planets fit into the eyepiece field of view.
      My location on the east coast of Australia was totally overcast for the last week and this evening I had a small window of opportunity to actually have a glimpse of the rare event, which no doubt, I will not have a another chance of experiencing in my life time.
      This happened about 17 hours after the actual closest point between the planets, and most likely the difference would be so small that it wouldn't be noticeable without direct comparison. 
      This image was composited by first taking a series of shots through the eyepiece using an iPhone, I chose the best frame of the series than superimposed the overexposed planets with images of the planets captured separately with enough transparency as to accurately show how the planet details looked in the eyepiece.
      Observation time was 22 December 2020 @ 09:51 UTC.
      Clear Skies,
      MG
       
       

    • By bomberbaz
      So I originally planned to go to a good vantage point from the top of Pendle hill, watch out for witches whilst there. It is a local and well known Lancastrian landmark. However my wife is recovering from hospital treatment and so I didn't want to leave her so made do much closer to home.
      A short drive (2 minutes) took me to a place aside the motorway slip road but with a clear-ish view of the setting planets. I was only use 10x30 bins so the view was not particularly well defined but still impressive when considering distances and such. 
      Anyway it is in the bag but would like to do better if at all possible. 
      If the skies are more obliging tomorrow I may venture out with the EEVA set up and grab some data, however the forecast is not so good.
      Cheers
    • By theonlypromg
      The Great Conjunction
      who else waiting for the Great Conjunction between Saturn and Jupiter in 21 December 2020
      Click here to watch
       
       
       
    • By DiZZyViZiON
      Hi. Complete newbie to the hobby here. Just purchased a Meade Lightbridge 130 for my daughter as an upgrade to her Skywatcher Infinity 76. I'd like for her to see the rings of Saturn sometime with her new scope. Would getting a better lens improve her chances of a good view of the rings of Saturn? And if so, what lens would you recommend. Thank you
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.